Case law

Barrera v. State

371 S.W.2d 881 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 9, 1963

We have heretofore in Head v. … Brown v. State, 160 Tex.Cr.R. 150 , 267 S.W.2d 819 , and Clifton v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 339 S.W.2d 902 . The same is true as to the alleged newly discovered evidence. Wofford v.

Woods v. State

480 S.W.2d 664 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 22, 1972

In Cox v. … Vera v. State, 473 S.W.2d 22 , (Tex.Cr.App.), Ansley v. State, 468 S.W.2d 862 (Tex.Cr.App.); Walsh v. State, 468 S.W.2d 453 (Tex.Cr.App.); Brown v. State, 460 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.Cr.App.).

Wright v. State

111 Tex. Crim. 240 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 28, 1928

Appellant cites Haney v. State, 57 Texas Crim. Rep. 158 ; Deneaner v. State, 58 Texas Crim. Rep. 624 ; Brown v. State, 100 Texas Crim. Rep. 487 ; Hankins v. State, 75 S. W. Rep. 787 , and Riojas v. … Douglas v. State, 54 Texas Crim. Rep. 639 ; Garcia v. State, 146 S. W. Rep. 942 .

Craiger v. State

48 Tex. Crim. 500 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 19, 1904

This question was admirably elucidated in Shannon v. State, 35 Tex.Crim. Rep.. … As bearing out this view of the law, see Nichols v. State, 24 Texas Crim. App., 137; Martinez v. State, 35 Tex.Crim. Rep..

Hughes v. State

154 Tex. Crim. 65 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 14, 1949

See Brown v. State, 112 Tex. Cr. R. 92 , 14 S. W. 2d 63 ; Mosley v. State, 108 Tex. Cr. R. 157 , 300 S. W. 48 ; Williams v. State, 113 Tex. Cr. R. 219 , 18 S. W. 2d 654 ; Torres v. State, 113 Tex. Cr. R. 1 , 18 S. … W. 2d 179 ; Staglik v. State, 111 Tex. Cr. R. 623 , 13 S. W. 2d 376 ; and Cox v. State, 111 Tex. Cr. R. 260 , 12 S. W. 2d 586 .

Haire v. State

39 S.W.2d 70 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 22, 1931

On the other hand, in Moore v. State, 66 Tex. Cr. R. 169 , 146 S. W. 183 ; Brown v. State, 67 Tex. Cr. R. 543 , 150 S. W. 436 , and Cox v. State, 100 Tex. Cr. R. 172 , 272 S. … So concluding, and in order that no further conflict may appear, the cases of Brown v. State, 67 Tex. Or. B. 543, 150 S. W. 436 ; Moore v. State, 66'Tex. Or. B. 169, 146 S. W. 183 , and Cox v. State, 100 Tex. Cr.

Smith v. State

154 Tex. Crim. 234 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 21, 1949

This statute was applied in the case of Walker v. State, 138 Tex. Cr. R. 343 , 135 S. W. (2d) 992 ; and also Cook v. State, 152 Tex. Cr. R. 51 ; 211 S. W. (2d) 224 . … The cited case of Babin v. State, 149 Tex. Cr. R. 339 , 194 S. W. (2d) 563 , is not in point, same being raised relative to a charge of negligent homicide in a trial for murder. We think the case of Walker v.

Whaley v. State

686 S.W.2d 950 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 27, 1985

In this context I would once again wish to dissociate myself from the position taken in Judge McCormick’s plurality opinion in Brown v. … Crowell cannot be read to support this position, see Brown v. State, supra (Clinton, J., concurring), and I want no part of the judicial abdication inherent therein.

Bridger v. State

503 S.W.2d 801 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 9, 1974

I had a .38 caliber chrome plated revolver and Gary had the brown satchel the officers recovered. I stood in the lobby and Gary went behind the counter and started putting money in the bag. … App.D.C. 404, 473 F.2d 115 (D.C.Cir.1973); Cannito v. Sigler, 449 F.2d 542 (8th Cir.1971); United States v. Pardo, 436 F.2d 968 (5th Cir. 1971); Brown v. Beto, 425 F.2d 246 (5th Cir. 1970); Erving v.

Downey v. State

505 S.W.2d 907 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 20, 1974

A brown paper bag containing 50 one hundred dollar bills and some cocaine in a matchbox were found in the glove compartment. … Howard v. State, supra.

Thomas v. State

80 Tex. Crim. 216 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 11, 1916

App., 121; Browning v. State, 26 Texas Crim. App., 432; Boyett v. State, 26 Texas Crim. App., 689; Brooks v. State, 24 Texas Crim. App., 274; Jackson v. State, 23 Texas Crim. App., 183; Hennessey v. … App., 156; Ellis v. State, 30 Texas Crim. App;, 601; Browning v. State, 26 Texas Crim. App., 432; Boyett v. State, 26 Texas Crim. App., 689; Covey v. State, 23 Texas Crim. App., 388; Self v. State, 28 Texas Crim.

Porter, Ex Parte Allen Wayne

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 8, 2010

Porter v. State, No. 01-91-00454-CR (Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.], delivered July 16, 1992). Applicant was convicted solely on eyewitness testimony. … See Ex parte Brown, 205 S.W.3d 538, 545 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Relief is granted.

Dunn v. State

34 Tex. Crim. 257 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 20, 1895

Wampler v. The State, 28 Texas Crim. App., 352. … Musquez v. The State, 41 Texas, 226 ; McPhail v. The State, 9 Texas Crim. App., 165.

Fleming v. State

101 Tex. Crim. 19 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 18, 1925

Simpkins v. State, 251 S. W. Rep. 1084 ; Davis v. State, 255 S. W. Rep. 1112 ; Holman v. State, 243 S. W. Rep. 1093 ; Gillespie v. State, 190 S. W. Rep. 148 , Craig v. State, 30 Texas Crim. Rep. 621 . … Best v. State, 58 Texas Crim. Rep. 327 ; Petty v. State, 216 S. W. Rep. 867 ; Britton v. State, 253 S. W. Rep. 519 ; Schutz v. State, 257 S. W. Rep. 880 .

Barrios v. State

83 Tex. Crim. 548 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 12, 1918

Teem v. State, 79 Texas Crim. Rep., 285 . … Giles v. State, 66 Texas Crim. Rep., 638 , 148 S. W. Rep., 317 ; Brown v. State, 73 Texas Crim. Rep., 571 ; Ferguson v. State, 187 S. W. Rep., 476 ; Ellis v. State, 189 S. W. Rep., 1074 ; Moore v. State, 78 Texas Crim.

Procella v. State

395 S.W.2d 637 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 23, 1965

V. … See Brown v. State, 160 Tex.Cr.R. 150 , 267 S.W.2d 819 , 822 and cases cited.

Roney v. State

632 S.W.2d 598 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 5, 1982

more difficult since the complainant was testifying through an interpreter, are to be regarded as an attempt to impeach her identification such that bolstering testimony then becomes admissible, then the *604 rule of Lyons v. … Such crossexamination may have laid a predicate for impeachment in only one respect — “Did you tell the police he had short brown hair?” — but there was no effective followup, thus no impeachment.

Townsend v. State

481 S.W.2d 855 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 26, 1972

Walsh v. State, 468 S.W.2d 453 ; Mattei v. State, 455 S.W.2d 761 ; McAlpine v. State, 455 S.W.2d 247 ; Doby v. State, 383 S.W.2d 418 , cert, denied, 380 U.S. 920 , 85 S.Ct. 914 , 13 L.Ed.2d 804 (1965). … Mason testified that he received the evidence from Witness Anderson and that capsules containing a brown material were in the balloon. He analyzed the substance in the capsules and testified that it was heroin.

Uppenkamp v. State

89 Tex. Crim. 131 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 30, 1921

App., 4; Westbrook v. State, 23 Texas Crim. App., 401, 5 S. W. Rep., 248 ; Hanson v. State, 35 Texas Crim. Rep., 593 , 34 S. W. Rep., 929 ; Haygood v. State, 51 Texas Crim. Rep., 618 , 103 S. W. Rep., 890 ; Carnes v. … Brown v. State, 28 Texas Crim. App., 65, 11 S. W. Rep., 1022 ; Weaver v. State, 13 Texas Crim. App., 191; Loving v. State, 9 Texas Crim. App., 471; Cassady v. State, 4 Texas Crim.

Morris v. State

131 Tex. Crim. 338 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 28, 1936

Brown between 7:30 p. m. and 8 p. m. The three appellants left said place together and returned together about 10 p. m. The following morning they left the place together. … Proctor v. State, 25 S. W. (2d) 350 ; Wise v. State, 273 S. W., 850 ; Stone v. State, 265 S. W., 900 .