Case law

Ex Parte Brown

773 S.W.2d 332 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 21, 1989

More recently, in Eason v. State, 768 S.W.2d 312 (Tex.Crim. App.1989), we recognized that the Beck, supra, holding applies with equal force in an attempted capital murder case. … Also see Mathews v. State, 768 S.W.2d 731 (Tex.Cr.App.1989). Under Banks and Truong , isn't applicant using the post-conviction writ process to avoid the direct appeal process?

Evans v. State

534 S.W.2d 707 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 31, 1976

Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969); Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427 , 92 S.Ct. 1056 , 31 L.Ed.2d 340 (1972); Brown v. … “In Brown v.

Landor, Mabry J., Iii

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 29, 2011

ten minutes alone with the defendant. (35) At the suppression hearing, the defendant testified that Detective Brown threatened him during those ten minutes. (36) Detective Brown did not testify at the suppression hearing … Crutsinger v. State , 206 S.W.3d 607, 610-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (citing Brown v. Illinois , 422 U.S. 590, 598-99 (1975)). 58. Tex. R. App. P. 44.2(a). 59. Arizona v. Fulminante , 499 U.S. 279, 296 (1991). 60.

Ex Parte Yarbrough

122 Tex. Crim. 537 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 25, 1933

He sat the torch on the running board of the car, and placed a board from one fender to a drum or barrel, and was on this board preparing to wash the top of the car with gasoline which was in a bucket. … Adams v. State, 119 Texas Crim. Rep., 135 , 44 S. W. (2d) 713 , and authorities therein cited. *539 The judgment denying bail is reversed and bail granted in the sum of $5,000. Judgment reversed and bail granted.

Aaron v. State

163 Tex. Crim. 635 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 28, 1956

Cook v. State, 155 Tex. Cr. R. 580 , 238 S. W. (2d) 200 ; Morgan v. State, 159 Tex. Cr. R. 231 , 262 S. W. (2d) 713 ; Rent v. State, 160 Tex. Cr. R. 326 , 268 S. W. (2d) 674 ; and McEathron v. … Shuffield v. State, 20 S.W. (2d) 1057 ; and Brown v. State, 159 Tex. Cr. R. 306 , 263 S.W. (2d) 261 . We have considered appellant’s other contentions and are of the opinion that they do not reflect error.

Tucker v. State

65 Tex. Crim. 627 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 20, 1912

Stebbins v. State, 31 Texas Crim. Rep., 294 ; Thompson v. State, 32 Texas Crim. Rep., 265 ; Bradshaw v. State, 32 Texas Crim. Rep., 381 ; Timmon v. State, 34 Texas Crim. Rep., 363 ; Street v. State, 7 Texas Crim. … App., 5; Brown v. State, 38 Texas Crim. Rep., 597 ; Day v. State, 14 Texas Crim. App., 26, and many other cases.

Orosco v. State

164 Tex. Crim. 257 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 2, 1957

The automobile was again searched at the police station by Narcotic Officer Ray Lamp’l, who testified that he found loose particles of a substance all over the front seat, the floor boards, and also in the rear seat on the … Smith v. State, 159 Texas Cr. Rep. 271 , 262 S.W. 2d 723 ; and Barnes v. State, 161 Texas Cr. Rep. 510 , 278 S.W. 2d 305 .

Duncan v. State

459 S.W.2d 822 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 25, 1970

Beasley v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 428 S.W.2d 317 ; East v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 420 S.W.2d 414 ; Hill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 403 S.W.2d 797 , case II; Thompson v. State, 168 Tex.Cr.R. 357 , 327 S.W.2d 577 ; Brinkley v. … State, 161 Tex.Cr.R. 413 , 277 S.W.2d 704 ; and Brown v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 438 S.W.2d *823 926 (delivered March 5, 1969), and the cases cited in each of the above opinions.”

Focke v. State

65 Tex. Crim. 353 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 21, 1912

Wright v. The State, 37 Texas Crim. Rep., 146 ; Jones v. The State, 33 Texas Crim. Rep., 163 ; Hall v. The State, 33 Texas Crim. Rep., 537 ; Yawn v. The State, 37 Texas Crim. Rep., 205 . … (Brown v. The State, 57 Texas Crim. Rep., 269 ; Johnson v. Martin, 75 Texas, 33 ; Newnom v. Williamson, 46 Texas Civil App., 615, 103 S. W. Rep., 656 .)

Rubens v. State

166 Tex. Crim. 71 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 12, 1958

Paige v. State, 161 Texas Cr. Rep. 571 , 279 S.W. 2d 344 . … Rep. 548 , 272 S.W. 2d 524 ; Tyler v. State, 163 Texas Cr. Rep. 441 , 293 S.W. 2d 775 ; Robinson v. State, 163 Texas Cr. Rep. 499 , 293 S.W. 2d 781 .

Hernandez, Ex Parte Frank Garcia Jr.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 28, 2009

Smith v. State , 789 S.W.2d 590, 592 (Tex.Cr.App. 1990). … In Morrissey v.

Garza v. State

771 S.W.2d 549 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 17, 1989

Under Brown v. … Even before Brown v.

Stracener, Russell Lynn

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 15, 2011

The trial court was also ordered to make findings as to whether the Board of Pardons and Paroles had provided to applicant the due process required before sex-offender conditions may be imposed. Meza v. … There is no written statement by the Parole Board showing the evidence relied upon and the reason it attached sex offender conditions to Applicant's parole."

Booker v. State

165 Tex. Crim. 44 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 1, 1957

DeVault v. State, 159 Texas Cr. Rep. 360 , 264 S.W. 2d 126 ; Torres v. State, 158 Texas Cr. Rep. 224 , 254 S.W. 2d 398 ; Threadgill v. State, 156 Texas Cr. Rep. 157 , 239 S.W. 2d 813 . … Smith v. State, 152 Texas Cr. Rep. 145 , 210 S.W. 2d 827 ; Brown v. State, 152 Texas Cr. Rep. 440 , 214 S.W. 2d 792 ; Herrera v. State, 159 Texas Cr. Rep. 175 , 261 S.W. 2d 706 .

Ex Parte Bower

823 S.W.2d 284 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 4, 1991

California v. Brown, 479 U.S. 538, 545 [ 107 S.Ct. 837, 841 , 93 L.Ed.2d 934 ] (1987) (concurring opinion).... … Tison v. Arizona, 481 U.S. 137, at 149 , 107 S.Ct. 1676, 1683 , 95 L.Ed.2d 127, at 139 (1987) (delivered three months after California v. Brown, supra).

Hernandez, Ex Parte Frank Garcia Jr.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 28, 2009

Faulk v. State, 608 S.W.2d 625, 630 (Tex.Cr.App. 1980). … In Morrissey v.

Ex Parte Goodman

152 S.W.3d 67 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 20, 2004

Proctor v. State, 841 S.W.2d 1, 5-6 (Tex.Crim.App.1992). This constitutional policy of finality protects the defendant from attempts to relitigate the facts underlying the charge that was dismissed. See Brown v. … Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. at 168 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 . The State, in its current prosecution of appellant for aggregated theft, may attempt to prove any number of the aggregated theft’s constituent thefts.

Whan v. State

485 S.W.2d 275 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 28, 1972

Whan v. State, 438 S.W.2d 918 (Tex.Cr.App.1969). … Likewise, in Goss v.

Blackmon v. State

642 S.W.2d 499 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 8, 1982

We are aware also of broad language in Brown v. U.S., 356 U.S. 148, 158 , 78 S.Ct. 622, 628 , 2 L.Ed.2d 589 (1958) to the effect that a voluntary witness who takes the stand cannot claim the privilege. … Subsequent cases have narrowed the rule in Brown to defendants who take the stand in their own behalf. Jenkins v. Anderson, 447 U.S. 231, 236 , 100 S.Ct. 2124, 2128 , 65 L.Ed.2d 86 (1980).

Knox v. State

744 S.W.2d 53 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 30, 1987

Clark, supra; Anderson, supra; Brown v. State, 692 S.W.2d 146, 149 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st] 1985, PDR granted). … State, 697 S.W.2d 387, 390 (Tex.Cr.App.1985); Brown v. State, 692 S.W.2d 497, 501 (Tex.Cr.App.1985); Vanderbilt v.