Case law

Templeton v. State

152 Tex. Crim. 121 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 10, 1948

The object and purpose of the article mentioned was fully discussed by this court in Brown v. State, 140 Tex. Cr. R. 133 ( 143 S. W. (2d) 775 ), and we see no need to reiterate what was said in that case.

Ex Parte Heyman

45 Tex. Crim. 532 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 27, 1904

This case followed Ex parte Brown, 34 S. W. Rep., 131 . … Lim., pp. 78, 79; and see Ex parte Brown, 42 S. W. Rep., 554 .

Dale Roush, Individually and as Trustee of the Dale Roush Assets Trust v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Joel Hart

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 23, 2018

The Dueitts cite Brown v. … P. 165a, and inherent Brown, Lubbock, Texas, for Appellees. power, Bevil [**3] v.

Mitchell v. State

488 S.W.2d 786 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 10, 1973

C.” and the date “12-3-70” on the baggie, put the baggie in a brown envelope and placed same in the “locked-evidence box” at the police department. … Unlike Easley v.

Rhoades v. State

934 S.W.2d 113 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 2, 1996

Appellant contends that the time for parole eligibility is not within the jurisdiction of the parole board at all. … [citing California v. Brown, 479 U.S. 538 , 107 S.Ct. 837 , 93 L.Ed.2d 934 (1987) ] [emphasis added]. To Justice O’Connor, the evidence- is relevant because it relates to the moral culpability of a defendant’s act.

Whisenant v. State

557 S.W.2d 102 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 26, 1977

After reviewing a parole officer’s written report the Iowa Board of Parole, without granting him a hearing, recommitted Morrissey to the penitentiary. … Sappington v. State, 508 S.W.2d 840 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Gamble v. State, 484 S.W.2d 713 (Tex.Cr.App.1972).

Petty v. State

166 Tex. Crim. 569 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 22, 1958

See Cox v. State, 160 Texas Cr. Rep. 162 , 267 S.W. 2d 830 , the cases there cited, and Brown v. State, 164 Texas Cr. Rep. 244 , 298 S.W. 2d 140 . … Francis v. State, 56 Texas Cr. *571 Rep. 129 , 119 S.W. 97 , upon which appellant relies, is not authority here because the charge in that case did not state a penal offense.

Stephens v. State

138 Tex. Crim. 43 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 11, 1939

He seems to take the position that since Brown County was dry area prior to the adoption of Section 20 of Article 16 of the Constitution of this State in 1919, and the penalty for a violation thereof was a felony, that offenses … See Ferguson v. State, 133 Tex. Crim. Rep., 250, 110 S. W. (2d), 61 .

Fuller, Alonzo Diego

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 1, 2015

CR12265-H IN THE 35th DISTRICT COURT FROM BROWN COUNTY Per curiam. … Sanders v. U.S., 373 U.S. 1 (1963); Ex parte Carr, 511 S.W.2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974).

Dickens v. Court of Appeals for the Second Supreme Judicial District of Texas

727 S.W.2d 542 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 25, 1987

The Board filed a motion to quash the subpoena, claiming a statutory privilege. The trial judge overruled the motion and ordered the Board to turn over the documents to the defendant. … The Board then sought a writ of mandamus from this Court to vacate the trial court’s order. We held that the Board did not have any other adequate remedy because the Board could not appeal the trial court’s order.

Johnson v. State

525 S.W.2d 170 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 23, 1975

See and compare Cuellar v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 521 S.W.2d 277 . The phrase was interpreted in Thomas v. … Gleffe v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 509 S.W.2d 323 ; Thompson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 480 S.W.2d 624 .

Foster v. State

779 S.W.2d 845 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 28, 1989

In Brown v. State, 692 S.W.2d 497 (Tex.Cr.App.1985), this Court again dealt with this problem. … Brown, supra; Wintters, supra. *859 See also, Jasso v. State, 699 S.W.2d 658 (Tex.App. — 4th Dist.1985); Biegajski v. State, 653 S.W.2d 624 (Tex.App. — 4th Dist. 1983); Ballestero v.

Landrom v. State

145 Tex. Crim. 114 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 2, 1942

See Robbins v. State, 60 Tex. Cr. R. 523 , 132 S. W. 770 ; Brown v. State, 73 Tex. Cr. R. 571 , 166 S. W. 508 ; Teem v. State, 79 Tex. Cr. R. 285 , 183 S. W. 1144 ; Simpson v. State, 87 Tex. Cr. R. 277 , 220 S. W. 777 .

Perez v. State

514 S.W.2d 748 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 23, 1974

Corbett v. State, 493 S.W.2d 940 (Tex.Cr.App.1973). … See Crawford v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 358 , 292 S.W.2d 123 (1956); Vauss v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 228 , 370 F.2d 250 (1966); State v. Miller, 486 S.W.2d 435 (Mo.Sup.Ct.1972); Gilbert v.

Moreland v. State

127 Tex. Crim. 470 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 14, 1934

In McGee v. State, 37 Texas Crim. Rep., 670 , we said a verdict was certain when the intention of the jury, in connection with the pleading and charge, is understood. In Brown v. State, 77 Texas Crim. … See also Jones v. State, 7 Texas App., 103; Taylor v. State, 14 Texas App., 340; Carroll v. State, 24 Texas App., 313. Also in Willcox v. State, 68 Texas Crim.

Allen v. State

119 Tex. Crim. 592 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 13, 1931

The facts are similar to those disclosed in the case of Landrum v. State, 73 Texas Crim. Rep., 580 , 166 S. W., 726 . In that case the injured party was the owner of certain stock in the Amicable Life Insurance Company. … See Brown v. State, 99 Texas Crim. Rep., 441 , 270 S. W., 179 ; also Lee v. State, Opinion on Original Submission, 81 Texas Crim. Rep., 117 , 193 S. W., 316 . The judgment" is reversed and the cause remanded.

Beckham v. State

138 Tex. Crim. 431 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 10, 1940

This court has recently held in cause No. 20,610, Burl Simons v. … See Prater v. State, 284 S. W. 965 ; Brown v. State, 87 S. W. (2d) 720 ; Edwards v. State, 77 S. W. (2d) 241 ; Shipley v. State, 100 S.

Ellithorpe v. State

167 Tex. Crim. 266 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 28, 1959

Recently, in Shawhart v. State, 163 Texas Crim. … Brown v. State, 160 Texas Cr. Rep. 150 , 267 S.W. 2d 819 , and cases there cited. The stipulation as to what was discussed by the jury is set forth in the statement of facts on the main case.

Owen v. State

171 Tex. Crim. 236 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 7, 1961

.; Perry v. State, 160 Tex. Cr. R. 8 , 266 S.W. 2d 171 ; Pierson v. State, 160 Tex. Cr. R. 567 , 272 S.W. 2d 901 ; Dominguez v. State, 164 Tex. Cr. R. 571 , 303 S.W. 2d 384 . … Brown v. State, 156 Tex. Cr. R. 144 , 240 S.W. 2d 310 , Heath v. State, 156 Tex. Cr. R. 563 , 244 S.W. 2d 815 ; Abrego v. State, 157 Tex. Cr. R. 264 , 248 S.W. 2d 490 ; Doyle v. State, 159 Tex. Cr. R. 310 , 263 S.

Armstrong v. State

542 S.W.2d 119 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 7, 1976

The officers then boarded the plane and removed the four suitcases, which were found to contain marihuana. … In Higgins v.