Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstexcrimapp

9,209 results

0.44s

  • King v. State

    645 S.W.2d 782 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 15, 1981

    stated to affiant that he has been inside the above-described house within the last 48 hours and saw the above-described antique clock; further ‘The Source’ provided a sketch of an antique marble top washstand on a dark brown … Greene v. Massey, 437 U.S. 19 , 98 S.Ct. 2151 , 57 L.Ed.2d 15 (1978); Burks v. United States, 437 U.S. 1 , 98 S.Ct. 2141 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1 (1978).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McLaughlin v. State

    109 Tex. Crim. 307 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 15, 1928

    In Moore v. State, 146 S. W. 184 , and Brown v. State, 150 S. W. 438 , .are expressions which seem to support appellant’s contention. … The Brown case, 150 S.

    Cited 79 timesPublished
  • Jones v. State

    47 Tex. Crim. 126 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 13, 1904

    Ware v. State, 2 Texas Crim. App., 547. We hold there was a variance between the indictment and the evidence and that the charge of the court on this subject was erroneous. See Lucas v. State, 36 Texas Crim. … C., art. 839a; Williams v. State, 2 Texas Ct. Rep., 359; Brown v. State, 64 S. W. Rep., 1056 ; 3 Texas Ct. Rep., 227.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Rice v. State

    122 Tex. Crim. 64 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 19, 1932

    Buse testified that he lived six miles south of Bangs, Texas, in Brown county, Texas, and he saw the appellant on the morning of January 6, 1930, at his place of business about six miles south of Bangs; that at that time … C., sec. 1877; Hernandez v. State, supra; Pogue v. State, 12 Texas App., 283 ; Hogan v. State, 13 Texas App., 319; Clifton v. State, 39 Texas Crim. Rep., 619 . This, we think, the evidence fails to do.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • White v. State

    574 S.W.2d 546 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 24, 1978

    Fatemi v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 558 S.W.2d 463 ; Faulkner v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 549 S.W.2d 1 . Here the officers were suspicious of appellant “riding around with no purpose in mind.” … Shaffer v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 562 S.W.2d 853 ; Scott v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 549 S.W.2d 170 ; Brown v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 481 S.W.2d 106 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Scroggins v. State

    133 Tex. Crim. 378 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 15, 1937

    See Todd v. State, 275 S. W., 1013 . … Ballard v. State, 262 S. W., 85 ; House v. State, 94 S. W. (2d) 1159 ; Dailey v. State, 291 S. W., 242 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Martin

    127 Tex. Crim. 25 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 3, 1934

    In the particular transaction involved, Evans registered with appellant as desirous of going to Phoenix, Arizona; on the same day Brown, — a private citizen living in Iowa and not engaged in transporting passengers for hire … Brown, a *28 citizen of Iowa, could owe no duty to take out a chauffeur’s license in Texas based on the proposition that as he was passing through the State he shared the expenses of a trip with another person; nor could

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Rodriguez v. State

    374 S.W.2d 234 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 11, 1963

    Articles 658,659, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., Roberts v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 146 , 338 S.W.2d 718 ; Brown v. State, 153 Tex.Cr.R. 1 , 216 S.W.2d 226 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Arcila v. State

    834 S.W.2d 357 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 24, 1992

    Brick v. State, 738 S.W.2d 676 (Tex.Cr.App.1987). See also Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975). … In Juarez v. State, 758 S.W.2d 772 (Tex. Cr.App.1988), we adopted the four factors analysis in Brown v.

    Overruled on other grounds by Guzman v. State, 1997 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 72 (1997)Cited 104 timesPublished
  • Todd v. State

    89 Tex. Crim. 99 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 16, 1921

    In Beaumont v. State, 1 Texas Crim. … In Brown v. State, 38 Texas Crim. Rep., 597 , this court said, “duplicity consists of alleging in one count separate and distinct felonies.” In Ferguson v. State, 80 Texas Crim. Rep., 383 , 189 S. W.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Alexander v. State

    617 S.W.2d 269 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 17, 1981

    [Prosecutor]: Officer Brown, based upon your experience and your common knowledge, could this type of instrument be used to inflict serious bodily injury or death? A. Yes, I believe it could.” … Compare with Tatom v. State, 555 S.W.2d 459 (Tex.Cr.App.1977). Accordingly, we find the evidence insufficient to sustain the conviction.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Palma, Alexander

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 11, 2019

    GOV ’T CODE § 508.282 (setting the 41-day deadline), and that this denial of a final parole revocation hearing within a reasonable time violates Due Process, Morrissey v. … The Board of Pardons and Paroles and the Parole Division has violated the 41-day deadline required by Section 508.282, and it has violated Due Process as required by the Supreme Court’s holding in Morrissey v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gary Christopher Morrow v. State

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 29, 2015

    —————————— Clerk GARY MORROW, Appellant v. … Travis Sherman, TX 75090 Telephone: (903) 744-4252 Fax: (903) 893-1734 State Bar No. 24044294 Board Certified in Criminal Law Texas Board of Legal Specialization CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carlile v. State

    90 Tex. Crim. 1 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 24, 1921

    Meuly v. State, 20 Texas Crim. App., 274; Lacy v. State, 30 Texas Crim. App., 119; Barnett v. State, 76 Texas Crim. App., 555, 176 S. W. Rep., 580 . … Brumley v. State, 21 Texas Crim. App., 238; Cook v. State, 71 Texas Crim. Rep., 532 , 160 S. W. Rep., 465 ; Tillman v. State, 51 Texas Crim. Rep., 202 , 62 S. W. Rep., 1063 ; Branch’s Ann. P. C., Sec 1930.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Garcia v. State

    581 S.W.2d 168 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 11, 1979

    Jerome Brown at the punishment phase of the trial. Specifically, he contends that Dr. Brown’s testimony, based upon an examination of appellant, violated appellant’s right against self-incrimination. … State, 548 S.W.2d 63 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); Brown v. State, 554 S.W.2d 677 (Tex.Cr.App.1977).

    Vacated on other grounds by United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens, 453 U.S. 902 (1981)Cited 57 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Turner

    626 S.W.2d 785 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 27, 1982

    Applicant’s appeal was affirmed by this Court in Turner v. State, 372 *786 S.W.2d 346 (1963), to which opinion we refer the reader for a discussion of the facts of the primary offense. … The relief sought is granted and applicant is ordered to be released to the sheriff of Brown County to answer the indictment in trial court cause number 36,059.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • MacKey v. State

    480 S.W.2d 720 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 9, 1972

    Vaughn v. State, 456 S.W.2d 141 (Tex.Cr.App. 1970); Brown v. State, 402 S.W.2d 168 (Tex.Cr.App.1966); Hart v. State, 393 S.W.2d 916 (Tex.Cr.App.1965); Yarbrough v. State, 384 S.W.2d 705 (Tex.Cr.App. 1964); Polk v. … See Denham v. State, 428 S.W. 2d 814 (Tex.Cr.App.1968) and Grizzell v. State, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 362 , 298 S.W.2d 816 (Tex.Cr.App.1956). This ground of error is overruled. The judgment is affirmed.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Casey Dale Hammack v. State

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 6, 2015

    /S/ Zan Colson Brown Zan Colson Brown Assistant Criminal District Attorney CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I certify … /s/Zan Colson Brown Zan Colson Brown Assistant Criminal District Attorney

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mosley v. State

    686 S.W.2d 180 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 6, 1985

    Appellant gave Thompson a brown sack in which to put the drugs. … Andrews v. State, 652 S.W.2d 370, 375 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

    Cited 64 timesPublished
  • McCain v. State

    363 S.W.2d 257 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 2, 1963

    was permitted to prove that in one of the bottles there were 28 red capsules which contained a barbituric acid derivative; that another contained demerol or isonipecaine, a clear liquid; and that in the third were found 7 brown … Rodriguez v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 329 *259 S.W.2d 282; Welch v. State, 143 Tex.Cr.R. 529 , 154 S.W.2d 248 , 155 S.W.2d 616 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.