Case law

Blanton v. State

426 S.W.2d 871 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 24, 1968

Erwin v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.App. 323 , 350 S.W.2d 199 .” Stout v. State, Tex.Crim.App., 421 S.W.2d 914 . We need not rest our holding upon the absence of objection, however. … Brown v. State, Tex.Crim.App., 413 S.W.2d 922 , and cases cited. The judgment is affirmed.

Farmah v. State

883 S.W.2d 674 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 15, 1994

The Court of Appeals properly noted that the four-factor test discussed in Brown v. … See Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975). The "purpose and flagrancy of police misconduct" is the most important Brown factor to consider in an attenuation of the taint analysis.

Pinkston v. State

161 Tex. Crim. 310 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 9, 1955

With reference to where appellant was sitting in the automobile, Constable Burnett testified that the blasting caps and fuses were in a brown paper sack “right between his feet.” … Barnes v. State, No. 27,059 (page 510, this volume) 278 S.W. 2d 305 ; Hill v. State, No. 27,098, (page 540, this volume) 278 S.W. 2d 842 .

Haggerty v. State

490 S.W.2d 858 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 28, 1973

Appellant’s reliance upon Brown v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 144 , 240 S.W.2d 310 , is misplaced. … See Ochoa v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 394 S.W.2d 172 ; Ray v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.App. 640 , 343 S.W.2d 259 ; Gilderbloom v. State, 160 Tex.Cr.R. 471 , 272 S.W.2d 106 ; and McAllister v.

Rodriguez v. State

166 Tex. Crim. 86 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 26, 1958

Thereupon appellant removed from his pocket a package wrapped in brown paper and threw it on the ground. One of the officers ordered him to pick up the package, which was shown to contain fourteen marihuana cigarettes. … See: Martinez v. State, 157 Texas Cr. Rep. 603 , 252 S.W. 2d 186 . No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Carrillo v. State

591 S.W.2d 876 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 19, 1979

Bercaw, Jr., both members of the BISD board of trustees in 1972, testified that the board never authorized the use of the school’s postage meter for appellant’s campaign. … Brown v. State, 561 S.W.2d 484 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Caraway v. State, supra; Etheredge v. State, 542 S.W.2d 148 (Tex.Cr.App.1976); Reynolds v. State, 489 S.W.2d 866 (Tex.Cr.App.1972).

King v. State

645 S.W.2d 782 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 15, 1981

stated to affiant that he has been inside the above-described house within the last 48 hours and saw the above-described antique clock; further ‘The Source’ provided a sketch of an antique marble top washstand on a dark brown … Greene v. Massey, 437 U.S. 19 , 98 S.Ct. 2151 , 57 L.Ed.2d 15 (1978); Burks v. United States, 437 U.S. 1 , 98 S.Ct. 2141 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1 (1978).

Birchfield v. State

401 S.W.2d 825 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 16, 1966

Galan v. State, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 521 , 301 S.W.2d 141 and Huff v. … Tumbleweed Bowling Corporation v. Matise, Tex.Civ.App., 388 S.W.2d 479 , cites with approval Securities and Exchange Commission v.

Rice v. State

122 Tex. Crim. 64 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 19, 1932

Buse testified that he lived six miles south of Bangs, Texas, in Brown county, Texas, and he saw the appellant on the morning of January 6, 1930, at his place of business about six miles south of Bangs; that at that time … C., sec. 1877; Hernandez v. State, supra; Pogue v. State, 12 Texas App., 283 ; Hogan v. State, 13 Texas App., 319; Clifton v. State, 39 Texas Crim. Rep., 619 . This, we think, the evidence fails to do.

Adams v. State

524 S.W.2d 67 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 18, 1975

OPINION BROWN, Commissioner. … Vallejo v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 408 S.W.2d 113 . The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed. Opinion approved by the Court.

Rodriguez v. State

374 S.W.2d 234 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 11, 1963

Articles 658,659, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., Roberts v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 146 , 338 S.W.2d 718 ; Brown v. State, 153 Tex.Cr.R. 1 , 216 S.W.2d 226 .

Brown, Charles David

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 5, 2011

WR-11,971-05 CHARLES DAVID BROWN, Relator v. GRAYSON DISTRICT CLERK , Respondent ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NO. 031156-A IN THE 59 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FROM GRAYSON COUNTY Per curiam. … Grayson County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by: submitting the record on such habeas corpus application; submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be investigated, see McCree v.

McLaughlin v. State

109 Tex. Crim. 307 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 15, 1928

In Moore v. State, 146 S. W. 184 , and Brown v. State, 150 S. W. 438 , .are expressions which seem to support appellant’s contention. … The Brown case, 150 S.

Arcila v. State

834 S.W.2d 357 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 24, 1992

Brick v. State, 738 S.W.2d 676 (Tex.Cr.App.1987). See also Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975). … In Juarez v. State, 758 S.W.2d 772 (Tex. Cr.App.1988), we adopted the four factors analysis in Brown v.

Alexander v. State

617 S.W.2d 269 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 17, 1981

[Prosecutor]: Officer Brown, based upon your experience and your common knowledge, could this type of instrument be used to inflict serious bodily injury or death? A. Yes, I believe it could.” … Compare with Tatom v. State, 555 S.W.2d 459 (Tex.Cr.App.1977). Accordingly, we find the evidence insufficient to sustain the conviction.

Palma, Alexander

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 11, 2019

GOV ’T CODE § 508.282 (setting the 41-day deadline), and that this denial of a final parole revocation hearing within a reasonable time violates Due Process, Morrissey v. … The Board of Pardons and Paroles and the Parole Division has violated the 41-day deadline required by Section 508.282, and it has violated Due Process as required by the Supreme Court’s holding in Morrissey v.

Gary Christopher Morrow v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 29, 2015

—————————— Clerk GARY MORROW, Appellant v. … Travis Sherman, TX 75090 Telephone: (903) 744-4252 Fax: (903) 893-1734 State Bar No. 24044294 Board Certified in Criminal Law Texas Board of Legal Specialization CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Todd v. State

89 Tex. Crim. 99 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 16, 1921

In Beaumont v. State, 1 Texas Crim. … In Brown v. State, 38 Texas Crim. Rep., 597 , this court said, “duplicity consists of alleging in one count separate and distinct felonies.” In Ferguson v. State, 80 Texas Crim. Rep., 383 , 189 S. W.

Chaney v. State

59 Tex. Crim. 283 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 11, 1910

Johnson v. State, 4 Texas Crim. App., 594; Neiderluck v. State, 21 Texas Crim. App., 320; Willis v. State, 24 Texas Crim. App., 487; 6 S. W. Rep., 200 . … Brown v. State, 28 Texas Crim. App., 65; 11 S. W. Rep., 1022 ; Warrington v. State, 1 Texas Crim. App., 168. The other questions raised mainly relate to the sufficiency of the evidence.

Carlile v. State

90 Tex. Crim. 1 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 24, 1921

Meuly v. State, 20 Texas Crim. App., 274; Lacy v. State, 30 Texas Crim. App., 119; Barnett v. State, 76 Texas Crim. App., 555, 176 S. W. Rep., 580 . … Brumley v. State, 21 Texas Crim. App., 238; Cook v. State, 71 Texas Crim. Rep., 532 , 160 S. W. Rep., 465 ; Tillman v. State, 51 Texas Crim. Rep., 202 , 62 S. W. Rep., 1063 ; Branch’s Ann. P. C., Sec 1930.