Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstexapp

10,000+ results

2.46s

  • Hotze v. Miller

    361 S.W.3d 707 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 11, 2012

    Pigott created a website called the Tex-as Medical Board Watch “to expose and reform the Texas Medical Board.” … Hearst Corp. v. Skeen, 159 S.W.3d 633, 636-37 (Tex.2005) (per curiam); Carr v. Brasher, 776 S.W.2d 567, 569 (Tex.1989).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • White v. Hidalgo County Water Improvement Dist. No. 2

    6 S.W.2d 790 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 14, 1928

    “That the oath and report of the board of equalization were not made according to law. “That said property was not listed in the report of the board of equalization for said years, as required by law.” … Dist. v. Carr (Tex. Civ. App.) 267 S. W. 315 ; Ogburn v. Ward Co. Irr. Dist. (Tex. Civ. App.) 267 S. W. 316 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Ball v. Kerrville Independent School District

    529 S.W.2d 792 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 15, 1975

    See also: Temple Independent School District v. State Board of Education, 493 S.W.2d 543 (Tex.Civ.App. Austin 1973, no writ); McRae v. Lindale Independent School District, 450 S.W.2d 118 (Tex.Civ.App. … National Surety Corporation v. Friendswood Independent School District, 433 S.W.2d 690 (Tex.1968).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bartlett v. City of Corpus Christi

    359 S.W.2d 122 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 16, 1962

    In a somewhat similar case, to-wit, City of Corpus Christi v. … Hill v. Board of Adjustment of City of Castle Hills, 301 S.W.2d 490 (Tex.Civ.App., wr. ref.); Gartner v. Board of Adjustment of City of San Antonio, Tex.Civ.App., 324 S.W.2d 454 (n. r. e.).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Zane-Cetti v. City of Fort Worth

    269 S.W. 130 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 17, 1924

    Cohen v. City of Houston (Tex. Civ. App.) 205 S. W. 761 ; Eastham v. Steinhagen, 111 Tex. 597 , 243 S. W. 458 . … City of Waco v. Higginson (Tex. Com. App.) 243 S. W. 1078 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Freeman v. Garcia

    56 Tex. Civ. App. 638 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 30, 1909

    Ry. v. Rodgers, 89 Texas, 680 ; Texas & P. Ry. v. … (Payne v. Chicago & A. Ry. Co., 30 S. W., 148 ; Merryman v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 52 N. W., 545 .) That plaintiff’s act led directly to his injury can not be questioned.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Bryson v. Bertram Independent School District

    443 S.W.2d 77 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 2, 1969

    City of Arlington v. Cannon, 153 Tex. 566 , 271 S.W.2d 414 (1954); McPhaul v. City of Lubbock, 401 S.W.2d 705 (Tex.Civ.App., Amarillo, 1966, writ ref. n. r. e.). … McPhaul v. City of Lubbock, supra.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • General Motors Corp. v. Hopkins

    535 S.W.2d 880 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 19, 1976

    Hopkins said he then looked down at the floor board and saw that Averyt’s foot wasn’t even on the accelerator. … Henderson v. Ford Motor Co., supra; Pizza Inn, Inc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Schucht v. Stidham

    37 S.W.2d 214 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 29, 1930

    An account in part for items due for salary under a contract, and in part for board, involves isolated transactions resting on special contract, and is not an account whereby the relation of debtor and creditor is created … See Pope v. Beauchamp, 110 Tex. 271 , 280 , 219 S.W. 447 , 450 , where the court said: "Bearing in mind the rule clearly enunciated by this court, speaking through Judge Brown, in the case of Houston, E. W. T. Ry.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Capital Bank v. American Eyewear, Inc.

    597 S.W.2d 17 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 19, 1980

    Later, however, Hancock notified them that the bank’s board of directors had not approved it. … , or in a delegation of authority from the board of directors.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Hale v. McMurrey

    22 S.W.2d 499 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 1, 1929

    Board of School Trustees v. Wilson (Tex. Civ. App.) 15 S.W.(2d) 144 ; Henderson v. Miller (Tex. Civ. App.) 286 S. W. 501 ; Warren et al. v. Sanger Independent School District, 116 Tex. 183 , 288 S. … W. 159 ; City of Dallas v. Mosely (Tex. Civ. App.) 286 S. W. 497 ; County School Trustees v. Stiff (Tex. Civ. App.) 190 S. W. 216, 217 ; Adams v. Miles (Tex. Civ. App.) 300 S. W. 211 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brownson v. New

    259 S.W.2d 277 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 25, 1953

    Brown-son given in Cause No. 3236 on the docket of the District Court of Live Oak County, entitled T. J. Brownson v. First National Bank at. George West. … Rolfe v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Hardy v. Calhoun

    383 S.W.2d 652 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 15, 1964

    Lukens v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, [367] Pa. [608], 80 A.2d 765 ; Kline v. City of Harrisburg, 362 Pa. 438, 451 , 68 A.2d 182 .” … In the case of Thomas et al. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of City of University Park et al., Tex.Civ.App., 241 S.W.2d 955 , N.W.H., the people were interested in building a private swimming pool.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Angell v. Wood, Wire & Metal Lathers International Union

    324 S.W.2d 83 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 1, 1959

    This is the exclusive means whereby States may be enabled to act concerning the matters which Congress has entrusted to the National Labor Relations Board. Guss v. … Its decision in the first instance was San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 1957, 353 U.S. 26 , 77 S.Ct. 607, 609 , 1 L.Ed.2d 618 ,-as a companion case to Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board, supra.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Morelos v. State

    772 S.W.2d 497 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 18, 1989

    See Juarez, 758 S.W.2d at 776 , citing Schneckloth; Kolb v. State, 532 S.W.2d 87, 89 (Tex.Crim.App.1976); cf., Brown v. … Brown v. State, 696 S.W.2d 913, 914 (Tex.Crim.App.1985) (en banc); Brooks v. State, 599 S.W.2d 312, 318 (Tex. Crim.App.1979) (en banc); cf., Green v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Kohout v. City of Fort Worth

    292 S.W.3d 703 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 11, 2009

    Antonov v. Walters, 168 S.W.3d 901, 904 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2005, pet. denied). 21 . City of Argyle v. Pierce, 258 S.W.3d 674, 680 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2008, pet. dism’d). 22 . Id..; see also Bland Indep. Sch. Dist. v. … DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Inman, 252 S.W.3d 299, 304-05 (Tex.2008); M.D. Anderson Cancer Ctr. v. Novak, 52 S.W.3d 704, 708 (Tex.2001). 24 . Tex. Ass’n of Bus. v. Tex. Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440, 446 (Tex.1993). 25 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Mineola State Bank v. First National Bank of Mineola

    574 S.W.2d 246 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 22, 1978

    Gerst v. Nixon, 411 S.W.2d 350 (Tex.1966). … First National Bank, Grapevine v. State Banking Board, 419 S.W.2d 878 (Tex.Civ.App.1967, writ ref’d n. r. e.). Bearing in mind the admonition of Tex.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Spencer, Breanna

    Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 30, 2015

    STYLE: The State Of Texas COUNTY: Brown COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 35th District Court DATE: 3/05/15 Publish: Yes TC CASE … #: CR21994 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Breanna Spencer v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brownsville Independent School District v. Gamboa

    498 S.W.2d 448 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 31, 1973

    [I, 2] The findings of a school board must be supported by substantial evidence. Patillo v. County School Trustees of Wilson County, 235 S.W.2d 924 (Tex.Civ.App. … —San Antonio 1951, no writ);—Canutillo Independent School District v. Anthony Independent School District, 442 S.W.2d 916 (Tex.Civ.App.—El Paso 1969, n. r. e.).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Carey v. State

    855 S.W.2d 85 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 6, 1993

    Also, there was no testimony that contraband was in plain view at the time the search was initiated; therefore this case is not similar to Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983). … Supreme Court found that the officer properly seized the green balloon from Brown’s car.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.