Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstexapp

10,000+ results

0.41s

  • Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Van Arsdale

    108 S.W.2d 550 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 21, 1937

    Associated Employers’ Reciprocal v. Brown (Tex.Civ.App.) 56 S.W.(2d) 483 ; Travelers’ Ins. Co. v. Washington (Tex.Civ.App.) 5 S.W. (2d) 783 ; Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. … Psimenos v. Huntley (Tex.Civ.App.) 47 S.W.(2d) 622 ; Houston & T. C. Ry. Co. v. Stevenson (Tex.Com.App.) 29 S.W.(2d) 995 ; McClelland v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Clark v. McCarter

    332 S.W.2d 363 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 29, 1960

    Brown, because the said James L. Mitchell was still engaged in trial of a jury case in the 95th District Court. … Goodman v. Goodman, Tex.Civ.App., 236 S.W.2d 641 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. Hamil

    238 S.W. 672 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 4, 1922

    The cases of Browning v. Estes, 3 Tex. 463 , 49 Am. Dec. 760 , Gilbough v. Bunge, 99 Tex. 539 , 91 S. W. 566 , 122 Am. St. Rep. 659 , and Hardy v. Wright (Tex. Civ. App.) 168 S. W. 462 , cited in the opinion of Mr. … See Parker v. Brown, 80 Tex. 555 , 16 S. W. 262 ; Dutton v. Thompson, 85 Tex. 115 , 19 S. W. 1026 ; Thompson v. Dutton, 96 Tex. 205 , 71 S. W. 544 ; Paterson v. Rector (Tex. Civ. App.) 127 S. W. 561 . Browning v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Turnbow v. Barnsdall Oil Co.

    99 S.W.2d 1096 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 12, 1936

    Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Company (Tex.Sup.) 83 S.W.(2d) 935 , 99 Á.L.R. 1107; Id. (Tex.Sup.) 87 S.W.(2d) 1069 , 101 A.L.R. 1393 ; Railroad Commission v. … Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Company, supra.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. Hare

    107 S.W.2d 739 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 16, 1937

    No award may be made by the board, no judgment entered by a court, against an insurance carrier unless these conditions are fulfilled. Mingus v. Wadley, 115 Tex. 551 , 285 S.W. 1084 ; Hood v. Texas Employers’ Ins. … Co. v. Hilton, 126 Tex. 497 , 87 S.W.(2d) 1081, 1082 , 89 S.W.(2d) 1116 , said: “The board’s approval of a compromise agreement is not an award of compensation. Lumbermen’s Reciprocal Association v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • City of Carthage v. Allums

    398 S.W.2d 799 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 20, 1966

    Section 1 of Article VIII provides for appeal to a Board of Adjustment as follows : “Appeals may be taken to and before, the Board of Adjustment by any person aggrieved, or by any officer, department, board or bureau of the … In the City of Amarillo v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Gladney

    70 S.W.2d 342 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 24, 1934

    Head v. Smith, 60 Tex. 379 ; Beer v. Landman, 88 Tex. 450 , 31 S. W. 805 ; Wiggins v. Bisso, 92 Tex. 219 , 47 S. W. 637 , 71 Am. St. Rep. 837 . “As stated in Frost v. Plumb, 40 Conn. 111 , 16 Am. … Rep. 18 , quoted in Beer v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lindsley v. Dallas Consol. St. Ry. Co.

    200 S.W. 207 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 15, 1917

    Co. v. Central R. … Allen v. Clausen, 114 Wis. 244 , 90 N.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Riter v. Neatherly

    157 S.W. 439 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 19, 1913

    The question has been so carefully and clearly discussed in the opinion of Judge Brown in King v. Brown, 100 Tex. 109 , 94 S. W. 329 , that we need to add but little in answer to the contentions stated. … See King v. Brown, 100 Tex. 109 , 94 S. W. 329 , herein-before referred to.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Texas Employers' Ins. v. Teel

    40 S.W.2d 201 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 22, 1931

    Industrial Accident Board, State of Texas" — and on the notice the notation: "Received July 9th, 1930. Industrial Accident Board, State of Texas." … In Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. Neatherlin, 31 S.W.2d 673 , we held that notations like these stamped upon papers filed with the Industrial Accident Board were simply file marks.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Whitfield v. Traders & General Ins. Co.

    106 S.W.2d 359 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 2, 1937

    Co. v. Williams, supra;. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Scruggs (Tex.CiwApp.) 277 S.W. 768 . … Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • City of Houston v. Harris County Outdoor Advertising Ass'n

    732 S.W.2d 42 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 7, 1987

    United States Post Office Department, 397 U.S. 728 , 90 S.Ct. 1484 , 25 L.Ed.2d 736 (1970); Texas Liquor Control Board v. … Miller & Sons, Inc. v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Lowther v. Fernandez

    668 S.W.2d 886 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 30, 1984

    The bonds of the City Public Service Board are the bonds of the city. TEX. REV.CIV.STAT.ANN. arts. 1107, 1175. It is not relevant that the individual members of the City Public Service Board are not elected. Centeno v. … The Board owes its existence to the City of San Antonio. San Antonio Independent School District v. City of San Antonio, 550 S.W.2d 262 (Tex.1976).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Curran v. Texas Land & Mortgage Co.

    24 Tex. Civ. App. 499 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 14, 1900

    Beginning with the case of Browning v. Estes, 3 Texas, 463 , and ending with the case of Trust Company v. Beckley, 93 Texas, 267 , they may he found in nearly all the volumes of our Reports. … Browning v. Estes, 3 Texas, 463 ; Estes v. Browning, 11 Texas, 237 ; Jacks v. Ivory, 30 S. W. Rep., 716 ; Herman v. Geisecke, 33 S. W. Rep., 1009 ; Loan Co. v. Willis, 47 S. W. Rep., 389 ".

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Bohn v. Bohn

    455 S.W.2d 401 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 7, 1970

    Archer v. Griffith, supra; Holland v. Brown, 66 S.W.2d 1095 (Tex.Civ.App.—Beaumont 1933, writ ref.); Ivey v. Neyland, 25 S.W.2d 313 (Tex.Com.App., holding approved); Henyan v. … Holland v. Brown, supra.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Wonderley

    16 S.W.2d 386 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 20, 1929

    He further testified that he advised Wonderley to take the matter up with the board along in April or May. The copy of the claim report by Jones was introduced in evidence, and is stamped,: “Industrial Accident Board. … McKinney Steele Co. v. Lewellen, 224 Ky. 200 , 5 S. W.(2d) 1042 ; Elkhorn Coal Co. v. Combs, 214 Ky. 635 , 283 S.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Araujo v. Araujo

    493 S.W.3d 232 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 25, 2016

    Co. v. Woody, 640 S.W.2d 718, 721 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1982, no writ). … Corp. v. Leal, 892 S.W.2d 855, 858 (Tex.1995) (internal citation omitted); Coleman v. Zapp, 105 Tex. 491 , 151 S.W. 1040, 1041 (1912); James v. Hubbard, 21 S.W.3d 558, 561 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 2000, no pet.).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • City of Comanche v. Brightman

    88 S.W.2d 741 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 15, 1935

    Power v. Andrews (Tex.Civ.App.) 253 S.W. 870 ; Johnson v. Holland, 17 Tex.Civ.App. 210 , 43 S.W. 71 ; City of West University Place v. Home Mortgage Co. (Tex.Civ.App.) 72 S.W.(2d) 361 ; City of Sweetwater v. … (Tex.Civ.App.) 203 S.W. 801 ; Brundrett v. Lucas (Tex.Civ.App.) 194 S.W. 613 ; Rowland v. City of Tyler (Tex.Com.App.) 5 S.W.(2d) 756 ; Ogburn v. Ward County Irrigation Dist. (Tex.Com.App.) 280 S.W. 169 ; Allen v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Crenshaw v. Swenson

    611 S.W.2d 886 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 31, 1980

    Huffington v. Upchurch, 532 S.W.2d 576 (Tex.1976). … Hamman v. Ritchie, 547 S.W.2d 698 (Tex.Civ.App.—Fort Worth 1977, writ ref’d n. r. e.); Slay v. Burnett Trust, supra; Langford v. Shamburger, 417 S.W.2d 438 (Tex.Civ.App.—Fort Worth 1967, writ ref’d n. r. e.).

    Cited 61 timesPublished
  • Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Wiley

    155 S.W. 356 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 14, 1913

    Co. v. Anderson, 82 Tex. 516 , 17 S. W. 1039 , 27 Am. St. Rep. 902 ; T. & N. O. Ry. Co. v. Parsons, 109 S. W. 241 ; s. c., 102 Tex. 157 ; 113 S. W. 914 , 132 Am. St. … Dillingham v. Russell, 73 Tex. 47 , 11 S. W. 139 , 3 L. R. A. 634, 15 Am. St.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.