Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstexapp

10,000+ results

1.53s

  • A. Harris & Co. v. Caldwell

    276 S.W. 298 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 20, 1925

    Co. of Tex. v. Warner, 19 Tex. Civ. App. 463 , 49 S. W. 254 ; Cold v. Campbell, 54 Tex. Civ. App. 269 , 117 S. W. 464 , 465; Houston & T. C. Ry. Co. v. Roberson (Tex. Civ. App.) 138 S. W. 822, 823 ; Thompson v. … Co. v. Wegner (Tex. Civ. App.) 182 S. W. 45, 50 ; T. & P. Ry. Co. v. Rasmussen (Tex. Civ. App.) 181 S. W. 212, 218, 219 ; Houston Elec. Co. v. Flattery (Tex. Civ. App.) 217 S. W. 950 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Clement

    102 S.W.2d 289 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 18, 1937

    In the Brown v. Spector Case the plaintiff alleged the value of the loss of the use of his car to be $5 per day and prayed for judgment for that sum for the period of 497 days. … In Montgomery v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Beasley v. State

    810 S.W.2d 838 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 10, 1991

    Murphy v. State, 640 S.W.2d 297, 300 (Tex.Crim.App.1982); Moulton v. State, 486 S.W.2d 334, 337 (Tex.Crim.App.1971). … Webb v. State, 766 S.W.2d 236, 239 (Tex.Crim.App.1989); Hendley v. State, 783 S.W.2d 750, 752 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1990, no pet.).

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Greater Fort Worth v. Mims

    574 S.W.2d 870 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 30, 1978

    The agency’s board of directors held a meeting and voted to terminate Mims’ employment. Mims refused to relinquish his position claiming the action of the board violated the agency’s bylaws. … Faced with this situation the trial court appointed a receiver to reconstitute the membership of the board of directors and resolve the question of Mims’ termination. In applying Texas law the court in Meis v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Hurley v. Camp

    234 S.W. 577 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 24, 1921

    Rep. 505 ; Brown v. Reese, 67 Tex. 318 , 3 S. W. 292 ; Ewing v. Cohen, 63 Tex. 483 ; Bledsoe v. Railway, 40 Tex. 557 ; Commissioner v. Smith, 5 Tex. 479 . … De Poyster v. Baker, 89 Tex. 155 , 34 S. W. 106 ; Sansom v. Mercer, 68 Tex. 488 , 5 S. W. 62 , 2 Am. St. Rep. 505 ; Brown v. Reese, 67 Tex. 318 , 3 S. W. 292 ; Ewing v. Cohen, 63 Tex. 483 ; Bledsoe v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Northwest Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Brundrett

    970 S.W.2d 700 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 27, 1998

    In Murphy v. Cintas Corp., 923 S.W.2d 663, 665 (Tex.App. … In Achimon v. J.I. Case Credit Corp., 715 S.W.2d 73 (Tex.App.

    Cited 64 timesPublished
  • Security Union Casualty Co. v. Frederick

    295 S.W. 301 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 7, 1927

    Millers’ Indemnity Underwriters v. Cahal (Tex. Civ. App.) 257 S. W. 957 ; Texas Employer’s Insurance Association v. Moreno (Tex. Com. App.) 277 S. W. 84 ; Lumbermen's Reciprocal Association v. Anders (Tex. Civ. … Railway Co. v. Zwiener (Tex. Civ. App.) 38 S. W. 375 ; Railway Co. v. Norvell (Tex. Civ. App.) 115 S. W. 861 ; Railway Co. v. Bell, 24 Tex. Civ. App. 579 ; 58 S. W. 614 ; Railway Co. v. Coffman (Tex. Civ. App.) 160 S.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Human Biostar, Inc. v. Celltex Therapeutics Corp.

    514 S.W.3d 844 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 19, 2017

    See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737-38 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding). Courts apply state contract law in determining whether there is a valid agreement to arbitrate. … court, not the arbitrator, had the authority to decide the issue of arbitrability, Biostar asserts approval of the Agreement is a condition precedent to the formation of the contract that required approval by Bios-tar’s board

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Boudreaux

    213 S.W. 674 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 31, 1919

    On said claim the Industrial Accident Board made the following award: “November 16, 1917. “Israel Boudreaux, Employs, v. Gulf Production Co., Employer. C — 8332. “Texas Employers’ Insurance Ass’n, Insurer. … Chairman of Board. “J. H. Frieke, Member of Board. “J. H. Fowler, Member of Board.”

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Gayler v. Renfro

    576 S.W.2d 911 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 24, 1979

    Ass'n v. Williams, 57 S.W.2d 218 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas 1933, no writ); Traders & General Ins. Co. v. Boysen, supra; Federal Underwriters Exchange v. … It is well established that a compromise settlement agreement, when approved by the Board, is binding upon the parties to it unless and until the agreement is lawfully set aside. Moore v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Haslet State Bank v. Carper

    273 S.W. 289 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 6, 1925

    executed a promissory note to appellee for $280, and contemporaneously executed a chattel mortgage to secure the note, on property described as “one gray filly coming 3 years old; one gray-filly coming 4 years old; one brown … Bank v. Bank (Tex. Civ. App.) 166 S. W. 499 ; Maloney v. Greenwood (Tex. Civ. App.) 186 S. W. 228 ; Burlington State Bank v. Bank (Tex. Civ. App.) 207 S. W. 954 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Rio Vista Independent School District v. Grandview Independent School District

    379 S.W.2d 408 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 14, 1964

    There is no evidence of fraud or bad faith on the part of the county board in making the finding. The board’s determination is conclusive in the absence of fraud or bad faith. School Board of the City of Marshall v. … Haines v. McLean, 154 Tex. 272 , 276 S.W.2d 777, 781 ; Haley v. Murray, Tex.Civ.App., 177 S.W.2d 333, 338 , writ ref. w. m.; Walker v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Morgan v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission

    519 S.W.2d 250 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 7, 1975

    This court decided in Texas Liquor Control Board v. Longwill, 392 S.W.2d 725 (Tex.Civ.App. … Southern Canal Company v. State Board of Water Engineers, supra. Appellant’s first point of error is overruled.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Cheshier v. Tidwell

    260 S.W.2d 423 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 22, 1953

    Our Supreme Court in Maupin v. … See Hoover v. Wukasch, supra.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Pleasant Valley Common School Dist. No. 7 v. Story

    142 S.W.2d 258 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 23, 1940

    It seems to be the position of each party that the order of February 6, 1939, of the County Board of Martin County was void and ineffective. In the case of Pyote Independent School District v. … County School Trustees of Runnels County v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 95 S.W.2d 1001 . The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Travelers Insurance Co. v. Wyatt

    488 S.W.2d 897 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 12, 1972

    Justice Hamilton of the Supreme Court of Texas said, in Texas Employers Insurance Association v. Brantley, 1966, 402 S.W.2d 140 : “ . . . . … Texas Casualty Insurance Company v. Beasley, 391 S.W.2d 33 (Tex.Sup., 1965); Hawkins v. Safety Casualty Co. [ 146 Tex. 381 , 207 S.W.2d 370 ], supra.”

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lancaster v. Richardson

    13 Tex. Civ. App. 682 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 4, 1896

    In the case of O’Connel v. … Smith v. Fly, 24 Texas, 349 ; McConnell v. Duke, 29 Texas, 312 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Taggart v. Taggart

    540 S.W.2d 823 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Aug 30, 1976

    Busby v. Busby, supra; Mora v. Mora, 429 S.W.2d 660 (Tex.Civ.App.-San Antonio 1968, writ dismissed). … In re Marriage of Brown, 15 Cal.3d 838 , 126 Cal.Rptr. 633 , 544 P.2d 561 (1976).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • CONLEE SEED COMPANY v. City of Waco

    434 S.W.2d 214 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 7, 1968

    But if a board adopts a method that is illegal, arbitrary, or fundamentally wrong, or if its valuation is grossly excessive, the decision of such board may be attacked and set aside. State v. … And the taxpayer is not estopped to contend the assessment void because he failed to go before the Board of Equalization and enter a protest. French Ind. School Dist. of Jefferson County v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lee v. Hickson

    40 Tex. Civ. App. 632 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 22, 1905

    This suit was brought in the court below to set aside and vacate a judgment rendered in the District Court of Brown County on the 3d day of January, A. D. 1903, styled W. J. Lee v. T. L. … Co. land in Brown County, and for damages.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.