Case law

Zaidi v. Shah

502 S.W.3d 434 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 8, 2016

.”); State v. Brown, 262 S.W.3d 365, 370 (Tex.2008) (“Brown does not seek a remand for the trial court to consider, sanctions. A party generally is not entitled to relief it does not seek.”); Stevens v. Nat’l Educ. … And in Brown , there would have been no reason for the Texas Supreme Court to mention that “Brown does not seek a remand for the trial court to consider sanctions” if the court’s holding was based solely on Brown’s earlier

SAN ANTONIO PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY v. Chandler

360 S.W.2d 165 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 25, 1962

Travis Gas Corporation, 137 Tex. 314 , 153 S.W.2d 442 ; Hobbs v. Grant, Tex.Civ.App., 314 S.W.2d 351 ; Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Groves, Tex.Civ.App., 308 S.W.2d 919 ; Else v. … In Sinclair Refining Company v.

Trustees of Independent School Dist. of Cleburne v. Johnson County Democratic Executive Committee

52 S.W.2d 68 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 16, 1932

Love v. City of Dallas (Tex. Sup.) 40 S.W.(2d) 20 , par. 14; 24 R. O. L. 581. … Royse Independent School District v. Reinhardt (Tex. Civ. App.) 159 S. W. 1010 (writ ref.); Martine v. South San Antonio Ind. School District, 115 Tex. 145 , 277 S. W. 78 ; Gottlieb-Knabe Co. v.

Treadaway v. Whitney Independent School Dist.

205 S.W.2d 97 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 16, 1947

“V. That said M. … Braun v. Trustees of Victoria Ind. Sch. Dist., Tex.Civ.App., 114 S.W.2d 947 (writ ref.) ; Connally v. City of Waco, Tex.Civ.App., 53 S.W.2d 313 (writ ref.); City of Fort Worth v.

Anderson v. New York Underwriters Insurance Co.

613 S.W.2d 16 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 10, 1981

Galacia v. Texas Employers’ Insurance Association, 348 S.W.2d 417 (Tex.Civ.App. Waco 1961, writ ref’d n. r. e.). The Supreme Court has indicated its disagreement with that holding and in Clawson v. … Clawson v. Texas Employers Insurance Ass’n., supra; Independence Indemnity Co. v. White, 27 S.W.2d 529 (Tex.Com.App.1930, judgmt. adopted).

Pace v. American Freehold Land & Mortgage Co., of London

17 Tex. Civ. App. 506 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 1, 1897

Gordon Brown, to whom the notes were formerly executed and Who prepared the deed of trust, and who stated at the time of its execution and at the time at which it was subsequently renewed that the land intended to be excepted … Sparks v. Dawson, 47 Texas, 138 ; Rider v. Hunt, 6 Texas Civ. App., 241; Wallace v. Berry, 83 Texas, 330 ; Baines v. Ullman, 71 Texas, 529 .

Harleysville Mutual Insurance Co. v. Frierson

455 S.W.2d 370 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 6, 1970

The settlement agreement and the board’s approval did not constitute an adjudication of the issues of this or any other lawsuit. Lowry v. Anderson-Berney Bldg. Co. … Texas General Indemnity Co. v. Hancock, Tex.Civ.App., 422 S.W.2d 565 , no writ hist.; Texas Employers’ Ins. Ass’n. v. Steadman, Tex.Civ.App., 415 S.W.2d 211 , ref., n. r. e.; Trinity Universal Ins. Co. v.

Garrett v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

127 Tex. Civ. App. 543 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 20, 1934

Co. v. Armstrong et al. (Tex. Civ. App.) 63 S.W.(2d) 225 ; Houston Belt & Terminal R. Co. v. Baidone (Tex. Civ. App.) 62 S.W.(2d) 524 ; Commercial Cas. Ins. Co. v. Hamrick (Tex. Civ. App.) 60 S.W.(2d) 247 . … Co. of North America v. Murphy (Tex. Civ. App.) 53 S.W.(2d) 503, 504 ; Texas Employers’ Ins. Ass’n v. Knouff (Tex. Civ. App.) 271 S. W. 633, 636 . In the case of Texas Employers’ Ins. Ass’n v.

Garvey Elevators, Inc. v. Eagle Mountain-Saginaw Independent School District

423 S.W.2d 455 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 12, 1968

The Board was clothed with jurisdiction and at no time acted in excess of its powers. … No more than “error of judgment” by the Board could be said to appear, and this will not suffice as a basis for avoiding the Board’s action. City of Fort Worth v. Fort Worth Radiator Mfg.

Jackson v. Waco Independent School District

629 S.W.2d 201 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 18, 1982

Wilson v. Abilene ISD, CCA (Eastland) Er.Ref’d wom, 190 S.W.2d 406 ; Board of Trustees of Crystal City ISD v. Briggs, CCA (Beaumont) NRE, 486 S.W.2d 829, 835 . … Board of Adjustment v. Underwood, CCA (San Antonio) NRE, 332 S.W.2d 583, 585 . Also, the Manor ISD was not operating under a desegregation order.

Hamaker v. American States Insurance Co. of Texas

493 S.W.2d 893 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 15, 1973

Board of Insurance Commissioners v. Carter, 228 S.W.2d 335 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1950, err. ref., n. r. e.). The duties of the commission have been characterized as ministerial and not legislative in character. … “The board can exercise only such authority as is conferred upon it in clear and unmistakable terms by the Legislature. And its authority will not be extended by inference, but must be strictly construed.” Scanlan v.

Texas Architectural Aggregate, Inc. v. Adams

690 S.W.2d 640 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 3, 1985

Whelan v. State, 155 Tex. 14 , 282 S.W.2d 378 (1955); City of Saginaw v. Garvey Elevators, Inc., 431 S.W.2d 575 (Tex.Civ.App.1968, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Corrigan Properties, Inc. v. City of W. … Mingus v. Wadley, 115 Tex. 551 , 285 S.W. 1084 (Tex.1926).

Randolph v. Sanders

22 Tex. Civ. App. 331 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 13, 1899

The answer does not den)" and therefore admits (this being a mandamus proceeding,—Pearsall v. … Dewey v. School Dist., 43 Mich., 480 ; Gear v. Gray, 37 N. E. Rep., 1059. The writ was properly awarded, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Hubert v. Harte-Hanks Texas Newspapers, Inc.

652 S.W.2d 546 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 11, 1983

Industrial Foundation of the South v. Texas Industrial Accident Board, supra, at 685. … See, Sims v. CIA, 642 F.2d 562 (D.C.Cir.1980); Board of Trade v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 627 F.2d 392 (D.C.Cir.1980). .

Green v. State

736 S.W.2d 253 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 2, 1987

He testified that he asked Dottie Mae Brown why Appellant was spanking the baby and remarked to Dottie *255 Mae Brown that he [Appellant] must think the baby is five years old. … Allen v. State, 651 S.W.2d 267 (Tex.Crim.App.1983); Ruben v. State, 645 S.W.2d 794 (Tex.Crim. App.1983). The point of error is overruled. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. AFFIRMED. .

Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. Fry

418 S.W.2d 716 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 20, 1967

Mainer v. American Hospital and Life Ins. Co., 371 S.W.2d 717 , Tex.Civ.App. Austin, writ ref. n.r.e., Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Texas v. … Co. v. Houston, 121 S.W.2d 619 , Tex.Civ.App. Fort Worth, writ ref.; Texas Prudential Ins. Co. v. Wiley, 80 S.W.2d 1024 , Tex.Civ.App. Beaumont, writ dismissed.

Kissick v. Garland Independent School District

330 S.W.2d 708 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 20, 1959

Board of Trustees of University of Mississippi, 237 U.S. 589 , 35 S.Ct. 720 , 59 L.Ed. 1131 , and Wilson v. … Thompson v. Marion County Board of Education, Tenn., 302 S.W.2d 57, 58 .

Swenson v. McLaren

2 Tex. Civ. App. 331 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 7, 1893

Prior to this, on the 27th of May, 1889, the Commissioners Court of said county met as a board of equalization and ordered the clerk to give, ten days notice of the sitting of the board, and the clerk, in obedience to said … before the tax is paid on said property;” and in Duck v.

Roper v. Hall

280 S.W. 289 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 24, 1925

Board of Supervisors, 119 Iowa, 538 , 93 N. W. 585, 586 ; Shinn v. Cunningham, 120 Iowa, 383 , 94 N. W. 941 ; Burnett v. Markley, 23 Or. 436 , 31 P. 1050, 1051 ; Garrigus v. Board of Commissioners, 157 Ind. 103 , 60 N. … E. 950 , 951; Blades v. Hawkins, 133 Mo. App. 328 , 112 S. W. 979, 982 , affirmed 240 Mo. 187 , 144 S. W. 1198 , Ann. Cas. 1913B, 1082; Prothero v. Board of Commissioners, 22 Idaho, 598 , 127 P. 175, 177 ; Harris v.

New York Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Ehlinger

593 S.W.2d 432 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 30, 1980

notice of appeal to the Board. … The Texas Supreme Court has announced the rule that those parties to the Board’s award who do not become parties to the suit to set it aside are entitled to stand on the award. Latham v.