Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstexapp

10,000+ results

1.46s

  • Thompson v. Midwestern Insurance Co.

    361 S.W.2d 720 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 16, 1962

    jurisdiction to determine the amount of compensation to be awarded an injured employee until such issue has first been passed by the Industrial Accident Board, Tally v. … Co. v. Hilton, 126 Tex. 497 , 87 S.W.2d 1081 ; [ 89 S.W. 2d 1116 ] ; Traders and General Ins. Co. v. Bailey, 127 Tex. 322 , 94 S.W.2d 134 ; Texas Employers Insurance Association v.

    Disapproved by Employers Reinsurance Corporation v. Holt, 10 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 140 (1966)Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Harrington

    61 S.W.2d 167 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 19, 1933

    As said in Minor v. Accident Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 280 S. … The appellant’s failure and refusal to make the payments in accordance with the award of the Industrial Accident Board distinguishes this case from Franco v. Texas Employers’ Insurance Ass’n (Tex. Civ.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Tygart v. Hulshizer

    234 S.W. 1116 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 2, 1921

    It was further averred that in view of the fact that said James Brown and J. M. Tygart were mere sureties, and Margaret J. … George v. Stevens, 31 Tex. 670 -675; Womack v. Womack, 8 Tex. 397 , 58 Am. Dec. 119 . In the case of Stephen v. Beall, 22 Wall. p. 329 , 22 L.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Gibson v. Johnson

    414 S.W.2d 235 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 30, 1967

    In Jones v. … In Long v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Harris

    152 S.W.2d 857 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 23, 1941

    The Industrial Accident Board ordered an operation for hernia. The insurer tendered the operation and the employee, Harris, refused it. (This is the second appeal of this case, see Hartford Acc. & Indemnity Co. v. … Co. v. Staggs, 134 Tex. 318 , 134 S.W.2d 1026, 1030 ; Morris v. Jackson’s Model Laundry, Tex.Civ.App., 81 S.W.2d 798, 799 , writ refused; Brown v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Been v. PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO, INC

    352 S.W.2d 292 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 6, 1961

    The by-law which the new directors relied upon was Article V, § 3. 2 It authorizes the removal of a director without cause. … Article V, § 3, appears to conflict internally with another of the Association bylaws.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Greater Fort Worth v. Mims

    574 S.W.2d 870 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 30, 1978

    The agency’s board of directors held a meeting and voted to terminate Mims’ employment. Mims refused to relinquish his position claiming the action of the board violated the agency’s bylaws. … Faced with this situation the trial court appointed a receiver to reconstitute the membership of the board of directors and resolve the question of Mims’ termination. In applying Texas law the court in Meis v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • King v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n

    716 S.W.2d 181 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 10, 1986

    See Salas v. State, 592 S.W.2d 653, 655 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1979, no writ). See also Young v. Del Mar Homes, Inc., 608 S.W.2d 804, 807 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1980, writ ref’d n.r.e.). … Frank v. Kuhnreich, 546 S.W.2d 844, 846 (Tex.Civ.App.—San Antonio 1977, writ ref'd n.r.e.).

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Moreno

    260 S.W. 283 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 6, 1924

    to the board for relief. … It is provided, under article 5246 — 21 (V.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • King v. Sheppard

    157 S.W.2d 682 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 3, 1941

    Attorney General v. Williams, 174 Mass. 476 , 55 N.E. 77 , 47 L.R.A. 314 ; State v. Levitan, 200 Wis. 271 , 228 N.W. 140 ; and Shoemaker v. … In Ransom v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District v. Texas Education Agency

    797 S.W.2d 336 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 31, 1990

    Comm’n v. Pedernales Elec. … School Dist. v. Brockette, 567 S.W.2d 780, 785 (Tex.1978); McFarlin v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Texas Education Agency v. Cypress-Fairbanks I.S.D., 830 S.W.2d 88 (1992)Cited 9 timesPublished
  • United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Baker

    65 S.W.2d 344 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 8, 1933

    Ass’n v. Moreno (Tex. Com. App.) 277 S. W. 84, 87 . … Ass’n v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Superior Oil Co. v. Sinton Independent School District

    431 S.W.2d 383 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 25, 1968

    As stated by the Supreme Court in City of Arlington v. Cannon, supra, and quoted in State v. … See Blanc v. Meyer, 59 Tex. 89 ; State v. Hoffman, 109 Tex. 133 , 201 S.W. 653 ; Patrick v. City of Taft, Tex.Civ.App., 52 S.W.2d 297 , wr. dism.; McGinnis v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Republic Underwriters v. Tillamook Bay Fish Co.

    127 S.W.2d 219 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 29, 1937

    State, Tex.Civ.App., 277 S.W. 790 ; American Surety Company v. Tarbutton, Tex.Civ.App., 248 S.W. 435 ; Brown v. Sneed, 77 Tex. 471 , 14 S.W. 248 . … Brown v. Sneed, 77 Tex. 471 , 14 S.W. 248 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Allen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

    567 S.W.2d 547 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 18, 1978

    As our supreme court wrote in Cooper v. … Part 1 App. & Err. — Civil Cases § 283 at 116 (1974); Cross v. Hancock’s Estate, 176 S.W.2d 586 (Tex.Civ.App. —Amarillo 1943, writ ref’d w.o.m.); Hodges Drilling Co. v. Tyler, 233 S.W. 548 (Tex.Civ. App.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Sims

    615 S.W.2d 858 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 12, 1981

    Standard Motor Co. v. Blood, 380 S.W.2d 651 (Tex.Civ.App.1964, writ dism’d); Rhinetubes, Inc. v. Norddeutscher Lloyd, 335 S.W.2d 269 (Tex.Civ.App.1960, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Bolstad v. … In January of 1979 the appellee went to work for Brown and Root at $7.50 or $7.60 per hour.

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • Hulme v. Great National Life Ins. Co.

    116 S.W.2d 459 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 8, 1938

    Justice Critz, Tex.Com.App., 65 S.W.2d 271 ; Inter-Ocean Casualty Co. v. Brown, Tex.Civ.App., 31 S.W.2d 333 , writ dismissed; American National Insurance Co. v. … Co. v. Brock, Tex.Civ.App., 60 S.W.2d 861 , writ refused; Brady Mutual Life Ins. Ass’n v. Smith, Tex.Civ.App., 76 S.W.2d 231 ; Terry v. Texas Prudential Ins.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Thompson Ex Rel. Thompson v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co.

    11 Tex. Civ. App. 307 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 2, 1895

    Evansich v. Railway, 57 Texas, 128 ; Avery v. Railway, 16 S. W. Rep., 1015 ; Berger v. Railway, 20 S. W. Rep., 440 ; Railway v. Cullen, 29 S. W. Rep., 256 . … Law, 939, note 3; McDonald v. Railway, 86 Texas, 13 ; Cook v. Houston Nav. Co., 76 Texas, 357 ; Evansich v. Railway, 57 Texas, 127 ; Railway v. Cullen, 29 S. W. Rep., 578 . Judgment reversed] and cause remanded.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Shaw v. Shaw

    483 S.W.2d 825 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 26, 1972

    See also: Republic National Bank of Dallas v. Beaird, 475 S.W.2d 344 (Tex.Civ.App.—Beaumont 1972, writ ref’d); Miller v. Miller, 463 S.W.2d 477 (Tex.Civ.App.—Tyler 1971, writ ref’d n. r. e.); Brown v. … Brown, 442 S.W.2d 461 (Tex.Civ.App.—Eastland 1969, writ dism’d). Here the monthly support payments sued upon are based upon a written property settlement and not a court order or decree. It is of no consequence that Mr.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • City of Dallas v. Mitchell

    245 S.W. 944 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 25, 1922

    Appellee appealed from the ruling of the board of commissioners to the board of appeals or review, which body upheld the decision of the former board. … contained in articles 1965 to 1967 of the Revised Ordinances of the city of Dallas, dealing with this same subject, was declared void and unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of Texas on November 2, 1921, in the case of Spann v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.