Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstexapp

10,000+ results

1.20s

  • Tyrrell & Garth Inv. Co. v. American Title Guaranty Co.

    79 S.W.2d 153 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 27, 1934

    Taylor v. Duncan, Dallam Dig. 514; Piedmont & Arlington Life Insurance Co. v. Ray, 50 Tex. 511 ; Mellinger v. Houston, 68 Tex. 37 , 3 S. W. 249 ; Mottley v. Railway Co. (C. C.) 150 F. 406, 408 . … Co. v. Wurzbach (Tex. Civ. .App.) 189 S. W. 1006 ; G., C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Ellis, 70 Tex. *158 308 , 7 S. W. 722 ; Owazarzak v. Ry. Co., 31 Tex. Civ. App. 229 , 71 S. W. 793, 794 ; M., K & T. Ry. Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Driscoll v. Harris County Commissioners Court

    688 S.W.2d 569 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 15, 1984

    In the early case of Brady v. … Looscan v. County of Harris, 58 Tex. 511 (1883); County of Ward v. King, 454 S.W.2d 239 (Tex.Civ.App. — El Paso 1970, writ dism’d); Wexler v. State, 241 S.W. 231 (Tex.Civ. App. — Galveston 1922, no writ); Duncan v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson

    53 S.W.2d 811 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 5, 1932

    The Fidelity & Guaranty Company appealed from the award of the board. The attorney who represented Mrs. Gladys B. … See, also, Meyer v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 41 S. W. 632 ; Edelstein v. Brown, 100 Tex. 403 , 100 S. W. 129 , 123 Am. St. Rep. 816 ; Schwingle v. Keifer, 105 Tex. 609 , 153 S. W. 1132 ; 40 Cyc. 2222. Pinkard v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Cordova v. Associated Employers Lloyds

    250 S.W.2d 945 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 6, 1952

    On January 3, 1951, appellant’s attorney wrote a letter to the Board for forms in regard to the August injury. … Co. v. Hilton, 126 Tex. 497 , 87 S.W.2d 1081 ; Traders and General Ins. Co. v. Bailey, 127 Tex. 322 , 94 S.W.2d 134 ; Texas Employers Insurance Association v. Kennedy, 135 Tex. 486 , 143 S.W.2d 583 ; Caffey v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Texas Employers' Insurance Assoc. v. Steadman

    431 S.W.2d 556 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 24, 1968

    The Waco Intermediate Appellate Court in Western Alliance Insurance Co. v. … Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Merida v. Texas Municipal Retirement System

    597 S.W.2d 55 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 26, 1980

    Navarro Independent School Dist. v. Brockette, 566 S.W.2d 699 (Tex.Civ.App. 1978, no writ). … See also, Alpha Petroleum Co. v. Terrell, 122 Tex. 257 , 59 S.W.2d 364 (1933).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • First Hutchings-Sealy National Bank of Galveston v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

    532 S.W.2d 114 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 11, 1975

    The Board delivered the warrant to the surety company. The Commission of Appeals upheld the Board’s payment to the surety. … The bank’s assignment postdated the application assignment, and postdated the equitable rights existing in the board and subject to attach to the fund. Hess & Skinner Engineering Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. Little

    96 S.W.2d 677 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 19, 1936

    Corp. v. Francis (Tex.Civ.App.) 300 S.W. 137 ; Texas Employers’ Ins. Ass’n v. Price (Tex. Civ.App.) 300 S.W. 667 ; Id. (Tex.Civ. App.) 300 S.W. 672 ; Georgia Casualty Co. v. … Little (Tex.Civ.App.) 281 S.W. 1092 ; Home Life & Accident Co. v. Orchard (Tex.Civ.App.) 227 S.W. 705 ; Consolidated Underwriters v. Seale (Tex. Civ.App.) 237 S.W. 642 ; Texas Employers’ Ins. Ass’n v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n v. Singleton

    616 S.W.2d 232 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 18, 1980

    In Federal Underwriters Exchange v. … There can be no doubt that an award of compensation by the Board which has not been set aside creates a duty on the insurer to pay. As pointed out in Kinsey v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Rowlett v. Superior Insurance Co.

    325 S.W.2d 921 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 26, 1959

    Bailey v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir., 103 F.2d 448 . Also see Muldrow v. Texas Frozen Foods, Tex., 299 S.W.2d 275 ; Eberley v. First National Bank of Stanton, Tex.Civ.App., 272 S.W.2d 532 ; Barcus v. J. I. … Matossy v. Frosh, 9 Tex. 610 . The record conclusively shows a final award of the Board on August 27, 1958. By the award appellant was to receive as his portion $102.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Standard Insurance Co. v. Biggers

    352 S.W.2d 290 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 30, 1961

    Ass’n v. … Ass’n v. Curry, Tex.Civ.App., W/E Refused, 347 S.W.2d 334 . All of defendant’s points and the contentions thereunder made are overruled. The judgment of the Trial Court is affirmed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Quanah, A. & P. Ry. Co. v. Warren

    198 S.W. 814 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 30, 1917

    With reference to the construction of penal statutes, Brown, Justice, in Thompson v. M., K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas, 103 Tex. 372 , 126 S. W. 257 , 128 S. … In Texas Central Railroad Co. v. *816 Hannay-Frerichs & Co., 104 Tex. 603 , 142 S. W. 1165 , Judge Brown, said in construing article 4496, R. S. 1895 (article 6554, V. S. C.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Brannam

    245 S.W.2d 271 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 31, 1951

    Co. v. Ragsdale, 67 Tex. 24 , 2 S.W. 515 . … Farmers’ State Bank & Trust Co., v. Gorman Home Refinery, Tex.Com.App., 3 S.W.2d 65 ; Sanford v. John Finnigan Co., Tex.Civ.App., 169 S.W. 624 ; Sanderson v. Barton, [Barkman] 272 Mich. 179 , 261 N.W. 291 ; Gagne v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • White v. Holley

    3 Tex. Civ. App. 590 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 14, 1893

    The facts show, that in the case of Ricks v. … The 640 set aside to Ricks in his suit with Brown corners at B, C, E, and F. On September 17, 1876, this decree of partition between Ricks and Brown was made, setting aside to Ricks this 640 acres.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Travelers Insurance Company v. Adams

    407 S.W.2d 282 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 4, 1966

    County of Clinton v. Ramsey, 20 Ill.App. 577, 579 , 20 Bradw. 577, 579.” In Truck Insurance Exchange v. … Co. v. Orr, 205 Ark. 566 , 169 S.W.2d 651, 654 ; State v. Eustace, 117 Kan. 746 , 233 P. 109 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Sullivan v. City of Galveston

    17 S.W.2d 478 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 10, 1928

    Board of County Oom’rs of Hennepin County v. State Bank, 64 Minn. 180 , 66 N. W. 143 ; State v. Citizens’ Bank & Trust Co., 119 Ark. 617 , 178 S. W. 929 ; Board of Com'rs of Meeker County v. … Simons v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Swinney v. City of San Antonio

    483 S.W.2d 556 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 31, 1971

    In support of this argument, defendant calls our attention to that portion of the opinion of the Texas Supreme Court in State of Texas v. … City of Fort Worth v. Johnson, 388 S.W.2d 400 (Tex.1964). The finding of the violation of the subdivision ordinance in the order before us itself constitutes a recital of injury.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Spray v. Stash

    523 S.W.2d 262 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 18, 1975

    *263 RALEIGH BROWN, Justice. This is a summary judgment case. … Thornell v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States, 385 S.W. 2d 716 (Tex.Civ.App.—Texarkana, 1964, no writ).” See also Browning, Admission, 42 Texas L.Rev. 723 (1964).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Coleman v. Klöckner & Co. AG

    180 S.W.3d 577 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Aug 18, 2005

    On April 4, 1991, Brosig, along with Klóckner INA’s former CEO, Gunther Hering, traveled to Texas to attend a meeting with representatives from Hali-burton Co., Brown & Root, Inc. and Brown & Root Braun. … Orozco v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Georgia Casualty Co. v. Campbell

    266 S.W. 854 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 29, 1924

    Co. v. Howell, 101 Tex. 605 , 111 S. W. 142 ; Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Lee Farm Oil Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 230 S. W. 520 ; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Robertson, 63 Tex. Civ. App. 239 , 133 S. W. 455 . … Railway Co. v. Howell, supra.

    Cited 11 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.