Case law

Gibbs v. United States Guarantee Co.

218 S.W.2d 522 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 23, 1949

Community Natural Gas Co. v. Natural Gas & Fuel Co., Tex.Civ.App., Austin, 34 S.W.2d 900 . … (a) Every insurer shall file with the Board every manual of classifications, rules and rates, every rating plan and every modification of any of the foregoing which it proposes to use.

Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Davies

6 S.W.2d 792 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 2, 1928

Hayden v. Kirby, 31 Tex. Civ. App. 441 , 72 S. W. 198 ; O’Bannon v. Pleasants (Tex. Civ. App.) 153 S. W. 719 ; Terry v. Rutland (Tex. Civ. App.) 238 S. W. 709 . … Co. v. McDowell (Tex. Civ. App.) 73 S. W. 974 ; M. K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Reno (Tex. Civ. App.) 146 S. W. 207 ; H. & T. C. Ry. Co. v. Fanning, 40 Tex. Civ. App. 422 , 91 S. W. 344 ; Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Watts, 36 Tex.

Prince v. Peurifoy

396 S.W.2d 913 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 5, 1965

Dimerling v. Grodhaus, 152 Tex. 548 , 261 S.W.2d 561 . The same is true when a judgment is rendered on plaintiff’s cause of action without disposing of a cross-action. Browning v. … Ferris v. Carlson, Tex.Civ.App., 314 S.W.2d 295, 298 ; Brown v. Walker, Tex.Civ.App., 376 S.W.2d 854 . The application for writ of mandamus is denied. 1 .

Frazier v. Williams

359 S.W.2d 213 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 15, 1962

Brown, Consolidated Tungsten Mines, Inc., and Yucca Tungsten Company for conversion of certain mining properties located in Arizona. … Ladner v. Reliance Corporation, 156 Tex. 158 , 293 5.W.2d 758; Stockyards National Bank v. Maples, 127 Tex. 633 , 95 S.W.2d 1300 .

City of University Park v. Hoblitzelle

150 S.W.2d 169 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 15, 1941

See, also, Lombardo v. City of Dallas, 124 Tex. 1 , 73 S.W.2d 475 ; Munger, etc., Co. v. City of Groesbeck, Tex.Civ.App., 194 S.W. 1121 ; Luse et al. v. City of Dallas, Tex.Civ.App., 131 S.W.2d 1079 . … In Munger v. City of Groesbeck, supra [ 194 S.W. 1123 ], this court quoted with approval the remarks of the Supreme Court of Minnesota, in the case of Evison v.

Petroleum Casualty Co. v. Dean

92 S.W.2d 1140 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 4, 1936

Arterbury, took time to investigate the merits of the case before he filed it with the board, we think, is to be commended rather than to be classed as negligence. In New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. … Petroleum Casualty Co. v.

Strasburger v. Compton

324 S.W.2d 951 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 22, 1959

May v. Brown, 144 Tex. 350 , 190 S.W.2d 715 , 165 A.L.R. 1180 ; Brackenridge v. Roberts, 114 Tex. 418 , 267 S.W. 244 , 270 S.W. 1001 . With the former will revoked, appellant’s interest in the estate ceased. … Brown had prepared the will, and that with deceased’s knowledge and consent appellant had employed Mr. Brown to prepare the will.

City of Dallas v. Stewart

360 S.W.3d 517 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 11, 2008

Substantial evidence review is a limited standard of review requiring only more than a mere scintilla of evidence to support the Board's determination. See R.R. Comm’n of Tex. v. … See City of El Paso v. Pub. Util. Comm’n of Tex., 883 S.W.2d 179, 185 (Tex.1994). . The due process and takings claims were severed from her appeal of the Board’s order.

Hodges v. Swastika Oil Co.

185 S.W. 369 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 2, 1916

Consumers’ Lignite Co. v. Hubner, 154 S. W. 254 ; Railway v. May, 115 S. W. 901 ; Railway v. English, 59 S. W. 628 . … Howard Oil Co. v. Davis, 76 Tex. 633 , 13 S. W. 665 .

Dunsmore v. Menefee

74 S.W.2d 174 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 25, 1934

Gordon, instituted this suit against appellees, San Antonio Independent School District, its board of education, and certain individual members thereof-, seeking a mandamus requiring such -board to order an election some … Yett v. Cook, 115 Tex. 205 , 281 S. W. 837, 841 ; City of San Antonio v. Strumberg, 70 Tex. 366 , 7 S. W. 754 ; Staples v. State, 112 Tex. 61 , 245 S. W. 639 ; Dickson v. Strickland, 114 Tex. 176 , 265 S. W. 1012 .

Lufkin Land & Lumber Co. v. Noble

60 Tex. Civ. App. 30 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 23, 1910

(Searcy v. Grant, 90 Texas, 97 ). Both issues were sharply contested. … (Gillis v. Rosenheimer, 64 Texas, 246 -7; Smith v. Hughes, 23 Texas, 250 .)

Tally v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n

93 S.W.2d 1209 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 28, 1935

, and it is so ordered, adjudged and decreed by the said Board.” … Tally v. Texas Employers’ Insurance Association, 48 S.W.(2d) 988, 989 . It follows from this conclusion that our former order dismissing the appeal was correct and should be reinstated, and it has been so ordered.

Mercedes Independent School District v. Nolen

536 S.W.2d 662 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 29, 1976

In City of Odessa v. … The 1969 validating statute was effective prior to any attempted levy by the board. It is not prospective in its application and thus it does not validate any of the future board actions. Gifford-Hill and Co. v.

Birdville Independent School Dist. v. Deen

114 S.W.2d 628 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 18, 1938

In the case of Capps v. … Lone Star Salt Co. v. Railway Co., 99 Tex. 434 , 90 S.W. 863 , 3 L.R.A.(N.S.) 828; Carrico v. Stevenson (Tex.Civ.App.) 135 S.W. 260 ; Texas Railway Co. v.

Commercial Standard Insurance Co. v. American General Insurance Co.

444 S.W.2d 347 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 19, 1969

The majority opinion in Transport placed considerable weight on American Fidelity and Casualty Company v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. (5 Cir. 1957), 248 F.2d 509 , opinion by Judge R. Brown. … However, almost three years after Transport Judge Brown authored a concurring opinion in American Agric. Chem. Co. v.

City of Dallas v. Love

23 S.W.2d 431 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 4, 1930

See High School District v. Lancaster County, 60 Neb. 147 , 82 N. W. 380, 382 , 40 L. R. A. 343, 83 Am. St. Rep. 525 ; Board of Education v. Haworth, 274 Ill. 538 , 113 N. E. 930 ; Todd v. Board of Education, 54 N. … In Irvin v.

Western Indemnity Co. v. Milam

230 S.W. 825 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 7, 1921

Under section 15: “The board may compel the association in the cases provided for in this section to redeem their liability by payment of a lump sum as may be determined by the Board.” … The Industrial Accident Board has so construed this section, and, as we understand, uniformly allows a 5 per cent, discount. Lumberman’s Reciprocal Ass’n v. Behnken, 226 S. W. 154 .

Augustin Gabriel Cabrera v. State

513 S.W.3d 35 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 11, 2016

See Ex parte Brown, 158 S.W.3d 449 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Jefferson v. State, 803 S.W.2d 470 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1991, pet. ref’d); Earley v. State, 855 S.W.2d 260 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1993, pet. ref’d). . … See Ex parte Brown, 158 S.W.3d at 451-52 ; Jefferson, 803 S.W.2d at 471-72 . . See Ex parte Brown, 158 S.W.3d at 451-52 ; Jefferson, 803 S.W.2d at 471-72 . .

Jaco v. State

646 S.W.2d 278 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 14, 1983

Betty Dodson, summoned a Sherman attorney, Paul Brown, to consult Mrs. Templeton as to her last testament. On February 7, 1980, Brown, his partner John Hill, and Mrs. Dodson were present in Mrs. … During the same day of May 21, 1980, Lee Clark, who had been bequeathed a “large diamond ring” in the will prepared by attorney Paul Brown, hired Brown’s law firm to make application and secure Clark’s appointment as temporary

Rushing v. Thomas

63 S.W.2d 323 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 6, 1933

Brown that I would not even write the letter asking my client to do this. … It is said in Holcomb v.