Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstexapp

10,000+ results

1.48s

  • Cobb v. Downing

    1 S.W.2d 508 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 4, 1927

    Article 7564, Vernon’s Sayles’ Annotated Civil Statutes ; Graham v. Lasater (Tex. Civ. App.) 26 S. W. 472 ; Swenson v. McLaren, 2 Tex. Civ. App. 331 , 21 S. W. 300 ; Clawson Lumber Co. v. Jones, 20 Tex. Civ. … Co. v. Smith County, 54 Tex. page 1.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • East Texas Motor Freight Lines v. Franklin County Distilling Co.

    184 S.W.2d 505 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 1, 1944

    Co. v. Cross, 96 W.Va. 666 , 123 S.E. 572 ; Portland Flouring Mills Co. v. British & F. M. Ins. Co., 9 Cir., 130 F. 860 , certiorari denied 195 U.S. 629 , 25 S.Ct. 787 , 49 L.Ed. 352 ; New York, N. H. & N. R. Co. v. … Co. v. Michigan Central Ry. Co., 219 Ala. 593 , 123 So. 90 ; Missouri-Pacific Ry. Co. v. Sorrell, D.C., 21 F.Supp. 886 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • City of University Park v. Hoblitzelle

    150 S.W.2d 169 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 15, 1941

    See, also, Lombardo v. City of Dallas, 124 Tex. 1 , 73 S.W.2d 475 ; Munger, etc., Co. v. City of Groesbeck, Tex.Civ.App., 194 S.W. 1121 ; Luse et al. v. City of Dallas, Tex.Civ.App., 131 S.W.2d 1079 . … In Munger v. City of Groesbeck, supra [ 194 S.W. 1123 ], this court quoted with approval the remarks of the Supreme Court of Minnesota, in the case of Evison v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Dalco General Agency, Inc. v. Cotten

    457 S.W.2d 348 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 25, 1970

    An appeal was taken to the State Board of Insurance which heard the application de novo and on *350 May 14, 1969 affirmed the Commissioner’s ruling. … Comm., 83 Ariz. 387 , 322 P.2d 369 ; Meads v. Human, 84 Okl. 82 , 202 P. 797 . The judgment is correct. Plaintiffs points are overruled. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brannon v. Pacific Employers Ins. Co.

    221 S.W.2d 554 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 9, 1949

    Lumbermen’s Reciprocal Ass’n v. Henderson, Tex. Com. App., 15 S.W.2d 565, 566 , Syl. 2; Maryland Casualty Company v. Meyer, Tex.Civ. App., 41 S.W.2d 291 . … , that the petition must affirmatively show such jurisdiction, as thus declared by the Supreme Court through the Commission of Appeals in Travelers Insurance Company v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Maverick County Water Control & Improvement District 1 v. State

    456 S.W.2d 204 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 13, 1970

    City of Wichita Falls v. Williams, 119 Tex. 163 , 26 S.W.2d 910 (1930) ; Harris County v. Boyd, 70 Tex. 237 , 7 S.W. 713 (1888) ; Wichita County Water Improvement District No. 2 v. … City of Wichita Falls v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Urquhart v. Barnes

    335 S.W.2d 666 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 22, 1960

    Co. v. … Jones v. St. John, Tex.Civ.App., 178 S.W.2d 181 ; Fahey v. Clark, 125 Conn. 44 , 3 A.2d 313 ; Zuber v. Northern Pacific Railway Company, 246 Minn. 157 , 74 N.W.2d 641 ; Miller v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Garcia v. Employers Casualty Company

    519 S.W.2d 685 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 10, 1975

    —Austin 1968, writ ref’d n.r.e.), but it is clear that the Board’s award becomes final as to the parties before the Board who do not become parties to the suit to set aside the award within the statutory time. Latham v. … the time limitation prescribed by Art. 8307, § 5, V.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Strasburger v. Compton

    324 S.W.2d 951 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 22, 1959

    May v. Brown, 144 Tex. 350 , 190 S.W.2d 715 , 165 A.L.R. 1180 ; Brackenridge v. Roberts, 114 Tex. 418 , 267 S.W. 244 , 270 S.W. 1001 . With the former will revoked, appellant’s interest in the estate ceased. … Brown had prepared the will, and that with deceased’s knowledge and consent appellant had employed Mr. Brown to prepare the will.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. Curry

    347 S.W.2d 334 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 23, 1961

    insurer did not comply with Board rule 5.20.” … Truck Insurance Exchange v. Seelbach, Tex., 339 S.W. 2d 521 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Employers Casualty Co. v. Sloan

    565 S.W.2d 580 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 26, 1978

    Co. of Texas v. Boggs, supra. In Gerst v. … Co. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Security Union Ins. Co. v. Cartwright

    33 S.W.2d 1088 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 26, 1930

    Stephenson, representing Ella Cartwright, wrote the Industrial Accident Board as follows, under their number M-30S95, Henry Cartwright, deceased, v. … We say this for the following reasons: (a) The board was duly notified by letters received from Mr. Stephenson under the claim number of the board, M-30895, Henry Cartwright, Deceased, v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Harberson v. Arledge

    438 S.W.2d 591 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 14, 1969

    In Clark v. … A majority of the Board can transact the business of the Equalization Board. Ferris v. Kemble, 75 Tex. 476 , 12 S.W. 689 (1889); Conner v. City of Waxahachie, 13 S.W. 30 (Tex.Sup., 1889).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Green v. Blanks

    342 S.W.2d 141 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 23, 1960

    Brown.” The affidavit was duly acknowledged and recorded. … Brown v. Bickford, Tex.Civ.App., 237 S.W.2d 763 , er. ref., N.R.E.; Pickens v. Harrison, 151 Tex. 562 , 252 S.W.2d 575 ; McDonald Texas Civil Practice, Vol. 3, p. 1060.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Smith v. State

    840 S.W.2d 689 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 10, 1993

    The evidence shows that Laura Brown Dittner operated the vehicle under a lease from Chris Brown, who she thought to be the owner, and who was a lessee of the vehicle. … Gardner v. State, 780 S.W.2d 259, 263 (Tex.Crim.App.1989).

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Dowdle v. Texas American Oil Corporation

    503 S.W.2d 647 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 12, 1973

    Anderson Co. v. Kinsolving, supra. There three officers, who also consisted of a majority of the Board of Directors, informally agreed to pay a bonus. … Leon Farms Corp. v. Beeman, 240 S.W.2d 433 (Tex.Civ.App.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Jarnigan

    59 S.W.2d 281 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 29, 1933

    W. 366 ; Street v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.). 188 S. W. 725, 726, 727 ; Exum v. Mayfield (Tex. Civ. App.) 297 S. W. 607 ; Burke v. Dulaney, 153 U. S. 228 , 14 S. Ct. 816 , 38 L. … See, also, Helmke v. Prasifka (Tex. Civ. App.) 17 S.W.(2d) 463 (writ refused) and Pope v. Hennessey (Tex. Civ. App.) 38 S.W.(2d) 834 . It is not governed by Chalk v. Daggett (Tex. Com. App.) 257 S. W. 228, 230 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Matter of Marriage of Rutherford

    573 S.W.2d 299 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 30, 1978

    Stokes sought to foreclose on the property and notice of a trustee’s sale was posted by Brown, the substitute trustee. Prior to foreclosure, Mrs. … Rutherford v. Rutherford, 554 S.W.2d 829 (Tex.Civ.App.—Amarillo 1977, no writ). The final division of the estate is pending.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • City of San Antonio v. Stauffer

    331 S.W.2d 443 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 23, 1959

    Const., Vernon’s Ann.St.; State v. The Praetorians, 143 Tex. 565 , 186 S.W.2d 973 , 158 A.L.R. 596 ; Board of Water Engineers of State v. City of San Antonio, 155 Tex. Ill, 283 S.W.2d 722 ; Shannon v. … Rogers, Tex., 314 S.W.2d 810 ; Schlichting v. Texas State Board of Medical Examiners, Tex., 310 S.W.2d 557 ; Abernathy County Line Consol. Independent School Dist. v. New Deal Rural High School Dist.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. Lyon

    576 S.W.2d 114 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 12, 1978

    Ivy v. Carrell, 407 S.W.2d 212 (Tex.1966); Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, 134 Tex. 388 , 133 S.W.2d 124 (1939); Spears v. Brown, 567 S.W.2d 544 (Tex.Civ.App.Texarkana 1978, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Pierson v. … Ward v. Nava, 488 S.W.2d 736 (Tex.1973); Spears v. Brown, supra; Hughes v. Jones, 543 S.W.2d 885 (Tex.Civ.App.El Paso 1976, no writ); Continental Airlines, Inc. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.