Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstexapp

10,000+ results

0.95s

  • Harris County Appraisal District v. Texas National Bank of Baytown

    775 S.W.2d 66 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 27, 1989

    Neither case involved an allegation that the review board actually received notice within the 15-day requirement. In Texas Conference Ass’n of Seventh-Day Adventists v. … Id; see also Dallas County Appraisal Dist. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Burton v. Rogers

    492 S.W.2d 695 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 4, 1973

    The validity of rules regulating the practice had been upheld by our Supreme Court in several cases, e. g., Kee v. Baber, 157 Tex. 387 , 303 S.W.2d 376 (1957); Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. … Texas State Board of Medical Exam. v. McOlellan, 307 S.W.2d 317, 320 (Tex.Civ.App., Houston, 1957, error ref. n. r. e.). 10 .

    Reversed on other grounds by Burton v. Rogers, 17 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 136 (1973)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Partlow

    30 Tex. Civ. App. 599 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 10, 1902

    Ferrerro v. Telegraph Co., 35 Law. Rep. Ann., 548. … A contract without such a certificate as is thus required would unquestionably be void (Hosmer v. Sheldon School Dist., 25 Law. Rep. Ann., 382; *603 Ryan v. Dakota Co. School Dist., 27 Minn., 433 , 8 N. W.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Turbeville v. Gowdy

    272 S.W. 559 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 4, 1925

    In State of Texas v. Brownson, 94 Tex. 436 , 61 S. … See Poole v. Fleeger, 11 Pet. 185 , 9 L. Ed. 680 ; Sturges v. Carter, 114 U. S. 511 , 5 S. Ct. 1014 , 29 L. Ed. 240 ; Keith v. Guedry (Tex. Civ. App.) 114 S. W. 392 .

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Carr

    242 S.W.2d 224 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 11, 1951

    She was then temporarily residing in Austin at a boarding house owned by her sister. Cowan had previously talked to Mrs. … Appellant relies primarily upon Texas Osage Co-operative Royalty Pool v. Brown, Tex.Civ.App., 118 S.W.2d 944 , which involved an exchange of properties and is not in point here.

    Cited 155 timesPublished
  • Superior Incinerator Co. of Texas v. Tompkins

    37 S.W.2d 391 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 23, 1931

    Hannan v. Board of Education, 25 Okla. 372 , 107 P. 646 , 30 L.R.A. (N.S.) 214 ; Chippewa Bridge Co. v. Durand, 122 Wis. 85 , 99 N.W. 603 , 106 Am.St.Rep. 931 ; Ricketson v. … Ertle v. Leary, 114 Cal. 238 , 46 P. 1 ; Board of Com'rs of Huntington County v. Pashong, 41 Ind. App. 69 , 83 N.E. 383 ; Packard v. Hayes, 94 Md. 233 , 51 A. 32 ; People v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange

    275 S.W. 279 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 21, 1925

    Henne & Meyer v. Moultrie, 97 Tex. 216 , 77 S. W. 607 . … Co. v. Haynes, 82 Tex. 448 , 18 S. W. 605 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • City of Saginaw v. Garvey Elevators, Inc.

    431 S.W.2d 575 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 19, 1968

    The City suggests that there is no material difference in the instant case from that in the case of Garvey Elevators v. Eagle Mountain-Saginaw I. S. D., 423 S.W.2d 455 (Fort Worth Tex.Civ.App. 1968, no writ hist.). … Of the cases cited to us as authoritative we have found the most aid in State v. Whittenburg, 153 Tex. 205 , 265 S.W.2d 569 (1954).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Raymond v. Aquarius Condominium Owners Ass'n

    662 S.W.2d 82 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 10, 1983

    See: Board of Directors of By-the-Sea Council of Co-owners, Inc. v. Sondock, 644 S.W.2d 774, 780 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1982, writ ref’d n.r.e.). … See Board of Directors of By-the-Sea Council of Co-owners, Inc. v. Sondock, 644 S.W.2d 774, 780-81 (Tex.Civ.App.—Corpus Christi 1982, writ ref’d n.r. e.); Seagate Condominium Ass’n., Inc. v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Clark

    23 S.W.2d 405 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 15, 1929

    In the case of Chapman v. … Co. v. Crawford (Tex.Civ.App.) 19 S.W.2d 166 .

    Cited 55 timesPublished
  • Mann v. State of Texas

    18 Tex. Civ. App. 701 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 23, 1898

    In the case of Johnson v. … Mandeville v. Reynolds, 68 N. Y., 544 ; Dobson v. Pearce, 12 N. Y., 156 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Calvin v. KOLTERMANN, INC. v. UNDERREAM PILING CO.

    563 S.W.2d 950 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 1, 1977

    See Board of Trustees of Crystal City Ind. School Dist. v. Briggs, 486 S.W.2d 829 (Tex.Civ.App. … Texas Constitution, Art. 2, § 1, Vernon’s Ann.St.; Davis v. City of Lubbock, 160 Tex. 38 , 326 S.W.2d 699, 711 (1959); Scott v. Texas State Board of Medical Examiners, 384 S.W.2d 686, 691 (Tex.1964).

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Williams

    57 S.W.2d 218 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 4, 1933

    Ass’n v. Nelson (Tex. Civ. App.) 292 S. W. 651 . … Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. Cary (Tex. Com. App.) 25 S.W.(2d) 302 ; McFaddin v. Hebert, 118 Tex. 314 , 15 *222 S.W.(2d) 213; Floyd v. Fidelity Union Casualty Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 39 S.W.(2d) 1091 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bennett v. Tarrant County Water Control & Improvement District No. One

    894 S.W.2d 441 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 22, 1995

    The recorded plat and dedication of the Water Board-Dunaway' Subdivision where all but three of the Landowners’ properties are located also contains similar language. … See Bennett v. Brown County Water Improvement Dist. No. 1, 153 Tex. 599 , 272 S.W.2d 498, 499 (1954); Hodge, 163 S.W.2d at 856 .

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Frank v. Minton

    531 S.W.2d 413 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 11, 1975

    (d) The board shall meet * * *. (e) Three members of the board shall constitute a quorum ⅝ * *. (f) * * * all rules and regulations * * * of the board shall be posted * * in the courthouse * * *. … We note that Article 2372p-3 VATS was held to be constitutional in Robinson v. Hill, Tex., 507 S.W.2d 521 . It is undisputed that Travis County is a County with more than 150,000 population.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Maryland Casualty Co. v. Moore

    74 S.W.2d 769 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 25, 1934

    Lumbermen’s Recip Ass’n v. Behnken, 112 Tex. 103 , 246 S. W. 72 , 28 A. L. R. 1402; Great American Ind. Co. v. McElyea (Tex. Civ. App. Wr. Ref.) 57 S. W.(2d) 966 ; Choate v. Hartford Accident & Ind. Co. (Tex. Civ. App. … Co. v. Hilton (Tex. Civ. App. Wr. Gr.) 55 S.W. (2d) 120 ; Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Culvahouse (Tex. Civ. App. Wr. DFWJ.) 10 S.W.(2d) 803 . Appellant relies upon the decision in Lumbermen’s Recip. Ass’n v. Wilmoth, (Tex.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. King

    52 S.W.2d 668 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 14, 1932

    This is a suit by appellee to set aside an award of the Industrial Accident Board of Texas. He is seeking to recover compensation for 401 weeks, at his wage rate, in a lump sum. … J. § 552; Dunham v. Randall & Chambers Co., 11 Tex. Civ. App. 205 , 32 S. W. 720 ; Harper v. Foster et al. (Tex. Civ. App.) 40 S. W. 40 (writ refused).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Green v. Blanks

    342 S.W.2d 141 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 23, 1960

    Brown.” The affidavit was duly acknowledged and recorded. … Brown v. Bickford, Tex.Civ.App., 237 S.W.2d 763 , er. ref., N.R.E.; Pickens v. Harrison, 151 Tex. 562 , 252 S.W.2d 575 ; McDonald Texas Civil Practice, Vol. 3, p. 1060.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Abshire v. State Ex Rel. Marrs

    260 S.W. 635 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 17, 1924

    School District v. Dudney, supra. In this case, the final order made by the state board of education was entered on the 17th day of October, 1923. … Terrell v. Greene, 88 Tex. 548 , 31 S. W. 631 ; Merrill, Mand. § 115; High, Extr. Rem. § 332; Thompson v. Board (N. J. Sup.) 31 Atl. 168 .”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Southern Surety Co. v. Lucero

    218 S.W. 68 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 8, 1920

    by the board was in conformity to and under the provisions of the amended act, and that appellant, being a party to that action and properly before the board, is bound by the judgment rendered. … Co. v. English, 96 Tex. 268 , 72 S. W. 58 . The question then is presented: Do the provisions of the act of the Thirty-Fifth Legislature apply?

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.