Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstexapp

10,000+ results

1.51s

  • Lischefski v. National Surety Corp.

    683 S.W.2d 811 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 13, 1984

    Texas Employers Insurance Association v. Singleton, 616 S.W.2d 232 (Tex.Civ.App. — San Antonio 1980, writ ref’d n.r.e.). … Texas Employers Insurance Association v. Singleton, 616 S.W.2d 232 (Tex. *813 App. — San Antonio 1980, writ ref’d n.r.e.). In Vestal v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Republic National Bank of Dallas v. Whitten

    383 S.W.2d 207 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 3, 1964

    Under such circumstances the Board of Directors could ratify the transaction either actively or by acquiescence. Kirby v. Fitzgerald, 126 Tex. 411 , 89 S.W.2d 408 ; Brooks v. Zorn, Tex.Civ.App., 24 S.W.2d 742 ; Hall v. … Menard v. Sydnor, 29 Tex. 257 (1867); Reed v. Continental State Bank of Beckville, 2 S.W.2d 426 (Tex.Com.App., 1928); McCombs v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Venting v. Carrigan

    26 S.W.2d 711 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 6, 1930

    Madeley v. Kellam (Tex. Civ. App.) 135 S. W. 659 ; Lane v. Sullivan (Tex. Civ. App.) 286 S. W. 541 ; Park v. Sullivan (Tex. Civ. App.) 12 S.W.(2d) 265 . … What it takes to constitute apparent or express authority or ostensible authority in a person to collect a note is fully discussed in Brown v. Guaranty Securities Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 265 S.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Ferris v. TEX. BD. OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAM.

    808 S.W.2d 514 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 5, 1991

    See, e.g., Smith County v. Thornton, 726 S.W.2d 2, 3 (Tex. 1986); Lower Colorado River Auth. v. City of San Marcos, 523 S.W.2d 641 (Tex.1975); Toyah Ind. Sch. Dist. v. Pecos-Barstow Ind. Sch. … Hinojosa, 797 S.W.2d 176, 183 (Tex.App. 1990, writ denied) (school board's hiring of principals at illegally convened meeting held to be void); City of Fort Worth v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Zamora v. Edgewood Independent School District

    592 S.W.2d 649 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 6, 1979

    Lacking any definitive or helpful interpretations of the statute, we invoke one of the maxims of statutory construction. *650 Chief Justice Cureton, in Harris County v. … See also, Brookshire v. Houston Independent School Dist., 508 S.W.2d 675, 679 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1974, no writ).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lock v. Citizens' Nat. Bank

    165 S.W. 536 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 7, 1914

    Lock, by the terms of which the Locks were ostensibly appointed as sole and exclusive agents for the sale of a combined educational chart, drawing board, and writing desk, in Smith county, Tex., from the 14th day of December … Bank v. Mulkey et al., 61 S.W. 528 ; Oppenheimer v. Farmers' Merchants' Bank, 97 Tenn. 19 , 36 S.W. 705 , 33 L.R.A. 767 , 56 Am. St. Rep. 778 ; Campbell v. Brown, 100 Tenn. 245 , 48 S.W. 970 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Holloway

    30 S.W.2d 921 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 17, 1930

    Co. v. … In Mingus v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange

    275 S.W. 279 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 21, 1925

    Henne & Meyer v. Moultrie, 97 Tex. 216 , 77 S. W. 607 . … Co. v. Haynes, 82 Tex. 448 , 18 S. W. 605 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Steddum v. Kirby Lumber Co.

    154 S.W. 273 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 13, 1912

    "`Samuel Steddum v. Phœbe Maria Steddum. … Veramendi v. Hutchins, 48 Tex. 531 ; Id., 56 Tex. 414 ; Box v. Word, 65 Tex. 159 ; Baldwin v. Roberts, 13 Tex. Civ. App. 563 , 36 S.W. 789 ; Brown v. Elmendorf, 25 S.W. 145 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Raymond v. Aquarius Condominium Owners Ass'n

    662 S.W.2d 82 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 10, 1983

    See: Board of Directors of By-the-Sea Council of Co-owners, Inc. v. Sondock, 644 S.W.2d 774, 780 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1982, writ ref’d n.r.e.). … See Board of Directors of By-the-Sea Council of Co-owners, Inc. v. Sondock, 644 S.W.2d 774, 780-81 (Tex.Civ.App.—Corpus Christi 1982, writ ref’d n.r. e.); Seagate Condominium Ass’n., Inc. v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • City of Amarillo v. Hancock

    233 S.W.2d 339 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 25, 1950

    Denison v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 61 S.W.2d 1017 ; English Freight Co. v. Knox, Tex.Civ.App., 180 S.W.2d 633 ; Fire Dept. of City of Fort Worth v. … In the case of English Freight Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • University of Texas System v. Letitia Thomas

    464 S.W.3d 754 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 26, 2015

    After parking her car, Thomas boarded a shuttle bus to take her to the building where she worked. … Evelyn V. Keyes Justice Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown. 12

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Awalt v. Beeville Independent School Dist.

    226 S.W.2d 913 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 28, 1949

    In the Whitsett Case (Live Oak County Board of School Trustees v. … This is made dear by the orders of the County Board. See Live Oak County Board of School Trustees v. North Common School District, Tex.Civ.App., 195 S.W. 436 , affirmed, North Common School District v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Mozley v. American General Insurance Company

    324 S.W.2d 925 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 13, 1959

    upon by said Board. … In Jud v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. King

    52 S.W.2d 668 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 14, 1932

    This is a suit by appellee to set aside an award of the Industrial Accident Board of Texas. He is seeking to recover compensation for 401 weeks, at his wage rate, in a lump sum. … J. § 552; Dunham v. Randall & Chambers Co., 11 Tex. Civ. App. 205 , 32 S. W. 720 ; Harper v. Foster et al. (Tex. Civ. App.) 40 S. W. 40 (writ refused).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Abshire v. State Ex Rel. Marrs

    260 S.W. 635 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 17, 1924

    School District v. Dudney, supra. In this case, the final order made by the state board of education was entered on the 17th day of October, 1923. … Terrell v. Greene, 88 Tex. 548 , 31 S. W. 631 ; Merrill, Mand. § 115; High, Extr. Rem. § 332; Thompson v. Board (N. J. Sup.) 31 Atl. 168 .”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re Dong Sheng Huang

    491 S.W.3d 383 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 24, 2016

    OPINION Harvey Brown, Justice Relator, Dong sheng Huang, seeks mandamus relief to compel the trial judge to (1) rule on Huang’s motion to compel responses to post-judgment discovery requests and (2) grant Huang’s previously … See Brown v. Tex. Emp’t Comm’n, 801 S.W.2d 5, 8 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1990, writ denied); Mandeville v. Mandeville, No. 01-15-00119-CV, 2015 WL 7455436 , at *5 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.]

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Tarrant County Appraisal District

    723 S.W.2d 350 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 22, 1987

    See Handelman v. Handelman, 608 S.W.2d 298, 301 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1980, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Wood Motor Co. v. Nebel, 232 S.W.2d 772, 776 (Tex.Civ.App. … See Terminix Intern., Inc. v. Lucci, 670 S.W.2d 657, 665 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1984, writ ref’d n.r.e.); First Nat. Bank v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Pyote Independent School District v. Estes

    390 S.W.2d 3 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 14, 1965

    Bowen v. Board of School Trustees, Tex.Civ.App., 16 S.W.2d 424 . … Trapp v. Shell Oil Co., 145 Tex. 323 , 198 S.W.2d 424 ; State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Marlow, 257 S.W.2d 761 (Tex.Civ.App., n.w.h.). For the reasons stated above, Point 5 must be overruled.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. Booker

    287 S.W. 130 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 20, 1926

    “The plaintiff: We offer that instrument in evidence, as follows: . “ ‘United States' Labor Board. “ ‘Shop Crafts v. … Federated Shop Crafts, v. Gulf Coast Lines. “Question. — Shall T. F.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.