Case law

Republic Ins. Co. v. Highland Park Independent School Dist. of Dallas County

57 S.W.2d 627 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 26, 1933

And in Vance v. … Ferguson v. Steen (Tex.Civ.App.) 293 S.W. 318 , supports the view that such a correction may be made by the board of equalization.

Gibson v. Carroll

180 S.W. 630 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 17, 1915

The court cited and quoted from the case of Risien v. Brown, 73 Tex. 135 , 10 S. W. 661 . We do not construe that case as sustaining the doctrine that riparian rights cannot be conveyed separately from the land. … Haas v. Choussard, 17 Tex. 588 ; Baker v. Brown, 55 Tex. 381 ; Rhodes v. Whitehead, 27 Tex. 316 , 84 Am. Dec. 631 ; Irrigation Co. v. Vivian, 74 Tex. 173 , 11 S. W. 1078 ; Watkins Land Co. v.

Tamez v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n

599 S.W.2d 115 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 16, 1980

This provision, requiring that notice be filed within twenty days after the Board’s final ruling, is mandatory and jurisdictional to a review of the Board’s action in the district court. Mingus v. … Angelina County v. McFarland, 374 S.W.2d 417, 420 (Tex.1964).

City & County of Dallas Levee Improvement Dist. v. Halsey, Stuart & Co.

202 S.W.2d 957 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 26, 1947

Co. v. Boles, Tex.Civ.App., 288 S.W. 271 ; Miles Realty Co. v. Dodson, Tex.Civ.App., 8 S.W.2d 516 ; Century Ins. Co. v. Hogan, Tex.Civ.App., 135 S.W.2d 224 ; 10 Tex.Jur. 996, Sec. 336. … No. 2 v. Feick, Tex.Civ.App., 111 S.W.2d 742 ; Cameron County Water Improvement Dist. No. 8 v. Western Metal Mfg. Co. of Texas, Tex.Civ. App., 125 S.W.2d 650 .

White v. State

852 S.W.2d 53 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 6, 1993

State, 718 S.W.2d 702, 706 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cer t. denied, 479 U.S. 885 , 107 S.Ct. 277 , 93 L.Ed.2d 252 (1986), overruled on other grounds, Juarez v. State, 758 S.W.2d 772 , 780 n. 3 (Tex.Crim.App.1988); Brown v. … In Brown , the court found that a detention occurred when two uniformed officers approached the defendant in a dark and fairly deserted area and asked her to stand. Brown, 790 S.W.2d at 360 . In Ebarb v.

Thomas v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company

305 S.W.2d 642 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 19, 1957

See Urie v. Thompson, 337 U.S. 163 , 69 S.Ct. 1018 , 93 L.Ed. 1282 ; Lukon v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 3 Cir., 131 F.2d 327 . … See DeWinne v. Allen, 154 Tex. 316 , 277 S.W.2d 95 .

Wingfield v. Pool

38 S.W.2d 422 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 19, 1931

Win-inger v. Railway Co., 105 Tex. 56 , 143 S. W. 1150 ; Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Cox, 145 U. S. 593 , 12 S. Ct. 905 , 36 L. Ed. 829 ; Brown v. Griffin, 71 Tex. 654 , 9 S. W. 546 ; Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. … W. 406 ; McHatton v. Rhodes, 143 Cal. 275 , 76 P. 1036 , 101 Am. St. Rep. 125 ; Dodge v. Coffin, 15 Kan. 285 ; Droge Elevator Co. v. Brown, 172 Iowa, 4 , 151 N. W. 1048 ; Robinson v. Freeman, 236 Mass. 446 , 128 N.

Employers Casualty Co. v. Sloan

565 S.W.2d 580 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 26, 1978

Co. of Texas v. Boggs, supra. In Gerst v. … Co. v.

Walker v. Walker

691 S.W.2d 102 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 15, 1985

See French v. Brown, 424 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex.1967). … The Brown v. Wood case cited *106 by the appellant is not applicable to this case.

Campbell v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n

920 S.W.2d 323 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 22, 1995

On May 12,1988, an Employer’s First Report of Injury or Illness was forwarded to the Industrial Accident Board. … Rogers v. Ricane Enter. Inc., 772 S.W.2d 76, 79 (Tex.1989); Brown v. Cain Chemical, Inc., 837 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, writ denied).

McCabe v. San Antonio Traction Co.

39 Tex. Civ. App. 614 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 31, 1905

I will state positively that she did step along the running board.” … (Commonwealth v. Sturtivant, 117 Mass., 133 ; Elliott on Evidence, secs. 676-678.)

Kaml v. Camp

78 S.W.2d 1046 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 16, 1935

And appeal from the action of the board under that authority properly lies in the school authorities. Barrett v. Tatum (Tex. Civ. App. Writ Ref.) 66 S.W.(2d) 444 . … S. 1925; Barrett v. Tatum, supra. The judgment is affirmed.

Mainolfi v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

624 S.W.2d 746 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 5, 1981

Co. v. … Co. v.

Hinojosa v. State

648 S.W.2d 380 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 8, 1983

Pena v. Rio Grande City Consolidated Independent School District, et al., 616 S.W.2d 658 (Tex.Civ.App.1981, no writ). … Walker v. State, 591 S.W.2d 493 (Tex.Cr.App.1979); Washington v. State, 408 S.W.2d 717 (Tex.Cr.App.1966); Robinson v. State, 382 S.W.2d 271 (Tex.Cr. App.1964).

Trinity Independent School Dist. v. District Trustees

135 S.W.2d 1021 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 14, 1939

Further the Supreme Court, in the case of Countz v. … Florey Common School District No. 5 of Andrews County et al. v. Board of School Trustees of Andrews County et al., Tex.Civ.App., 126 S.W.2d 536 ; Countz v. Mitchell, 120 Tex. 324 , 38 S.W.2d 770 ; Cox v.

Scottish Union & National Insurance v. Moore

36 Tex. Civ. App. 312 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 8, 1904

Co. v. Brown, 82 Texas, 631 ; Mutual Ins. Co. v. Mattingly, 77 Texas, 162 . … Co. v. Gunter, 12 Texas Civ. App., 598; Brown v. Palatine Ins. Co., 89 Texas, 590 , 35 S. W. Rep., 1060 .

Gittings, Neiman-Marcus, Inc. v. Estes

440 S.W.2d 90 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 14, 1969

Since the decision in Reese v. … In Gouldy v.

McFarlin v. State Ex Rel. Barnard

272 S.W.2d 630 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 28, 1954

Williams v. Castleman, 112 Tex. 193 , 247 S.W. 263 ; Willborn v. Deans, Tex.Civ.App., 240 S.W.2d 791 (er.ref.). … Three members of the board voted for respondent and three members of the board voted for Roy Botkins, .with the result that neither of such nominees was elected or appointed.

San Antonio Traction Co. v. Bryant

30 Tex. Civ. App. 437 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 19, 1902

Choate v. Railway, 90 Texas, 82 , 37 S. W. Rep., 319 ; Gaunce v. Railway, 20 Texas Civ. App., 36; Lee v. Railway, 89 Texas, 583 ,. 36 S. W. Rep., 63 ; Railway v. Gasscamp, 69 Texas, 545 ; Railway v. Medlenka, 43 S. W. … Rep., 669 ; Cummings v. Railway, 44 N. E. Rep., 126; Martin v. Railway, 51 S. C., 150, 28 S. E. Rep., 303 ; Doolittle v. Railway, 40 S. E. Rep., 133 . As is said in Elliott v.

Metzger v. City of San Antonio

384 S.W.2d 901 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 25, 1964

The failure to make the required findings rendered, the action of the Board illegal and void. In Skates v. … The trial court was authorized to annul the action of the Board and remand the entire proceedings back to the Board for further action. Noyes v.