Case law

City of Brownsville v. Public Utility Commission

616 S.W.2d 402 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 30, 1981

The controversy concerns which utility, the Public Utilities Board of Brownsville (PUB) or Magic Valley Electric Cooperative (MVEC), is authorized to serve seven subdivisions and an elementary school in Cameron County in … Section 50(2) is a part of Article VII, which is the only article of the Act which expressly applies to public utilities or public utility boards owned or operated by a municipality.

New Laredo Hotel, Inc. v. Webb County Appraisal District

777 S.W.2d 165 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Aug 23, 1989

Upon the filing of the present suit, the Appraisal District and the Board moved for dismissal for want of jurisdiction, for the failure of the taxpayer to personally appear before the Review Board. … See Keggereis v. Dallas Central Appraisal District, 749 S.W.2d 516, 518 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1988, no writ). The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded for trial on the merits.

Palatine Ins. Co. v. Griffin

202 S.W. 1014 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 6, 1918

In the case of Brown & Allen v. Jacobs Pharmacy Co., 115 Ga. 429 , 41 S. E. 553 , 57 L. R. A. 547, 90 Am. St. … Brown v.

Warren Independent School District v. Southern Neches Corp.

405 S.W.2d 100 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 14, 1965

In State v. … In passing upon this point we are controlled by the presumption stated in State v.

Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. D.H. Bledsoe

2 Tex. Civ. App. 88 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 3, 1893

Brown and Lionel A. Sheldon, as receivers. Under such circumstances a recovery, it is well settled, can not be adjudged against the receivers. Turner v. Cross and Eddy, 83 Texas, 218 ; Receivers v. … Brown v. Warner, 78 Texas, 543 ; Railway v. Geiger, 79 Texas, 13 . *90 These views remain unchanged after a careful perusal of the case of Railway v.

Gittings, Neiman-Marcus, Inc. v. Estes

440 S.W.2d 90 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 14, 1969

Since the decision in Reese v. … In Gouldy v.

Rieden v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen

184 S.W. 689 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 8, 1916

If disallowed by the Beneficiary Board, the claimant may appeal to the Board of Insurance, which may allow or disallow the claim, and its decision shall be finál. … As was said in the case of Pool v.

Mireles v. Deer Run Properties, Inc.

616 S.W.2d 342 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 14, 1981

In Board of Adjustment of City of Forth Worth v. … In adopting regulations concerning water main extensions, the Board, like the Board of Adjustment in Stovall , was clearly exercising “its legislative or governmental power,” Crownhill Homes, Inc. v.

Schaeffer v. Williams

208 S.W. 220 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 11, 1918

Lynch v. Baxter, 4 Tex. 431 , 51 Am. Dec. 735 ; Poor v. Boyce, 12 Tex. 443 ; Kleinecke v. Woodward, 42 Tex. 312 ; McNally v. Haynes, 59 Tex. 585 ; Gillienwaters v. Scott, 62 Tex. 672 ; Lyne v. … Stats, art. 5678; Dunn v. Taylor, 102 Tex. 80 , 113 S. W. 265 ; Flack v. Bremen, 45 Tex. Oiv. App. 473, 101 S. W. 537 ; Huling v. Moore, 194 S. W. 188 .

Blewett v. Richardson Independent School Dist.

230 S.W. 255 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 26, 1921

Walker v. Cole, 89 Tex. 323 , 34 S. W. 713 ; Prideaux v. Glasgow, 2 Tex. Civ. App. 182 , 21 S. W. 276 ; O’Fiel v. King, 23 S. W. 696 . … Brumby v. Boyd, 28 Tex. Civ. App. 164 , 66 S.

Cross v. Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Company

351 S.W.2d 84 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 19, 1961

Brown. Appellee, over several objections, persisted in reading excerpts from texts not recognized by Dr. … Brown with respect thereto. The Court erred in permitting such examination. Texas Employers’ Insurance Ass’n v. Nixon, Tex.Civ.App., 328 S.W.2d 809 , writ ref., n. r. e., 1959, and authorities cited.

Brooks v. Lucky

308 S.W.2d 273 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 12, 1957

The appellee contends that under Buss v. … On authority of Brannan v.

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Herriage

139 S.W.2d 873 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 26, 1940

The board has no jurisdiction thereafter to exercise control over the case. Vestal v. Texas Employers Ins. Ass’n., supra; Millers’ Indemnity Underwriters v. Hayes, Tex.Com.App., 240 S.W. 904 . … National Indemnity Underwriters v. Cherry, Tex.Civ.App., 110 S.W. 115 ; Consolidated Underwriters v. Saxon, Tex.Com.App., 265 S.W. 143 ; Gulf Casualty Co. v. Garner, Tex.Civ.App., 48 S.W.2d 746 .

Nelson v. Pioneer Specialties, Inc.

325 S.W.2d 924 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 2, 1959

Denton Milling Co. v. Blewett, Tex.Civ.App., 254 S.W. 236 , writ ref. 278 S.W. 1114 ; Edwards v. Keller, Tex.Civ.App., 133 S.W.2d 823 , error dism., corr. judgment; Beaton v. … Trustees of Soldiers’ & Orphans’ Home v. Shaffer, 63 Ill. 243 ; Martino v. Commerce Fire Ins. Co., 47 N.Y.Super.Ct. 520 .

Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Knouff

297 S.W. 799 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 16, 1927

Ass’n v. Knouff (Tex. Civ. App.) 271 S. W. 633 ; Miller’s Indemnity, etc., v. Hayes (Tex. Com. App.) 240 S. W. 904 ; Texas Employers’ Ins. Ass’n v. *802 Rodgers (Tex. Civ. App.) 284 S. W. 968 . … Railway Co. v. Titterington, 84 Tex. 218 , 19 S. W. 472 , 31 Am. St. Rep. 39 ; Mack Mfg. Co. v. Oeding (Tex. Civ. App.) 244 S. W. 156 ; Cearley v. May, 106 Tex. 442 , 167 S. W. 725 ; Texas Mfg. Co. v. Webb (Tex. Civ.

Myrtle Springs Reverted Independent School District v. Hogan

705 S.W.2d 707 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 4, 1985

Cummins v. Board of Trustees of Eanes Indep. School Dist., 468 S.W.2d 913 (Tex.Civ.App.-Austin 1971, no writ); Russell v. Edgewood Indep. School Dist., 406 S.W.2d 249 (Tex.Civ.App.-San Antonio 1966, writ ref’d n.r.e.). … Skagway City School Board v. Davis, 543 P.2d 218 (Alaska 1975); Miller v. Board of Education of School Dist. No. 132, 98 Ill.App.2d 305 , 240 N.E.2d 471 (1968); Winship v. Brewer School Comm., 390 A.2d 1089 (Me.1978).

Fleming v. State

704 S.W.2d 530 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 30, 1986

CURTISS BROWN, C.J., and MURPHY and ROBERTSON, JJ. OPINION MURPHY, Justice. … State v. Rumfolo, 545 S.W.2d 752, 754 (Tex.1976); Brown v. Barlow, 685 S.W.2d 406, 408 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1985, no writ). The rules which prescribe the perfection of an appeal are found in Tex.R.Civ.P. 354-363.

First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of San Antonio v. Bustamante

609 S.W.2d 845 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 26, 1980

In Perkins v. … Hidalgo v.

Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Dobbs

416 S.W.2d 869 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 26, 1967

In Roberts v. … In McKanna' v.

Tamez v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n

599 S.W.2d 115 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 16, 1980

This provision, requiring that notice be filed within twenty days after the Board’s final ruling, is mandatory and jurisdictional to a review of the Board’s action in the district court. Mingus v. … Angelina County v. McFarland, 374 S.W.2d 417, 420 (Tex.1964).