Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstexapp

10,000+ results

1.98s

  • Knight v. Oldham

    210 S.W. 567 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 6, 1919

    , as to all those entitled to it. [3] For our views upon these questions, stated at greater length, see Toy ah Valley Irrigation Co. v. … This could not be a test in this case, because this board only has jurisdiction over irrigation enterprises over which it is given the power of control by the provisions of the act creating it. Ladd v. S. C. P. M.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • S & a Marinas, Inc. v. Leonard Marine Corp.

    875 S.W.2d 766 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 8, 1994

    See R & P Enters, v. … See Chemical Bank & Trust, 185 S.W.2d at 466-67 ; see also Lower Colorado River Auth. v. McGraw, 125 Tex. 268 , 83 S.W.2d 629, 636 (1935) (holding that the LCRA board is a state board contemplated by Tex. Const, art.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Curry v. Marshall

    180 S.W. 892 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 24, 1915

    Article 5408 Revised Statutes: Erp v. Robison (Sup.) 155 S. W. 180 ; Adams v. Terrell, 101 Tex. 331 , 107 S. W. 537 ; Boswell v. Terrell, 97 Tex. 259 , 78 S. W. 4; Willoughby v. Townsend, 93 Tex. 80 , 53 S. … W. 581 ; Ford v. Brown, 96 Tex. 537 , 74 S. W. 535 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Lovett

    19 S.W.2d 397 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 19, 1929

    Georgia Casualty Co. v. Ward (Tex. Civ. App.) 220 S. W. 380 . … Liner v. U. S. Torpedo Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 12 S.W. (2d) 552 ; Halley v. Indemnity Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 32 S.W.(2d) 1002 ; I. & G. N. R. R. Co. v. Mills, 34 Tex. Civ. App. 127 , 18 S. W. 11 (error refused); Collins v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Bargas

    12 Tex. Civ. App. 59 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 18, 1895

    Burkett v. Scarborough, 59 Texas, 495 ; Satterwhite v. Rosser, 61 Texas, 166 ; Adams v. House, 61 Texas, 639 ; Neal v. Bartleson, 65 Texas, 478 . … Clay v. Clay, 7 Texas, 251 ; Wahrenberger v. Horan, 18 Texas, 57 ; Roberts v. Connellee, 71 Texas, 11 ; Davis v. Rankin, 50 Texas, 279 ; Williams v. Ball, 52 Texas, 603 . Delivered December 18, 1895.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Browning, Donta Tremaine

    Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 15, 2015

    Browning v. State, Nos. 01-14-00052-CR, slip op. at 1-4 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.], February 26, 2015, pet. pending). On March 9, 2015, Appellant timely filed his motion for rehearing. … Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gibson v. Carroll

    180 S.W. 630 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 17, 1915

    The court cited and quoted from the case of Risien v. Brown, 73 Tex. 135 , 10 S. W. 661 . We do not construe that case as sustaining the doctrine that riparian rights cannot be conveyed separately from the land. … Haas v. Choussard, 17 Tex. 588 ; Baker v. Brown, 55 Tex. 381 ; Rhodes v. Whitehead, 27 Tex. 316 , 84 Am. Dec. 631 ; Irrigation Co. v. Vivian, 74 Tex. 173 , 11 S. W. 1078 ; Watkins Land Co. v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Argo Data Resource Corp. v. Shagrithaya

    380 S.W.3d 249 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Aug 29, 2012

    While Shagrithaya disagreed with, and voted against, the compensation levels set by the board, the inability to control board decisions is inherent in the position of a minority shareholder. See Patton v. … board at the December 2008 board meeting.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Sigler v. Realty Bond & Mortgage Co.

    150 S.W.2d 845 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 18, 1941

    Scruggs resigned from ►he Board. In October, 1928, W. H. Slay, L. B. Curd and Dr. H. E. Stout were elected directors. On November 26, 1928, the appellant, Mrs. … Sayers v. Navillus Oil Co. et al., Tex.Civ.App., 41 S.W.2d 506 , writ refused, Scharbauer et al. v. Lampasas County, 235 S.W. 533 , Com. of App’ls. adopted by Supreme Court, 10 Tex.Juri., para. 40, page 632.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Alkire v. Dugan Drug Stores, Inc.

    468 S.W.2d 492 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 3, 1971

    Citizens National Bank in Abilene v. Texas & Pacific R. Co., 136 Tex. 333 , 150 S.W.2d 1003 (1941) ; Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Gossett, 130 Tex. 535 , 111 S.W.2d 1066 (1938). … Turner et al. v. Montgomery et al., 293 S.W. 815 (Tex.Com.App.1927); Brown v. Payne, 142 Tex. 102 , 176 S.W.2d 306 (Tex.1944).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Walker v. Walker

    691 S.W.2d 102 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 15, 1985

    See French v. Brown, 424 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex.1967). … The Brown v. Wood case cited *106 by the appellant is not applicable to this case.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Braden v. Transport Insurance Co.

    307 S.W.2d 655 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 8, 1957

    Industrial Accident Board v. Glenn, 144 Tex. 378 , 190 S.W.2d 805 ; Mingus v. Wadley, 115 Tex. 551 , 285 S.W. 1084 . See note. 1 This rule applies to Art. 8307, V.A.C.S., Traders & General Ins. Co. v. … After Mingus v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Nederland Independent School Dist. v. Carter

    93 S.W.2d 487 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 16, 1936

    It is unquestionably the settled rule in this state that the courts have no supervisory control over boards of equalization. State v. Mallet Land & Cattle Co. … Co. v. Shannon, 100 Tex. 379 , 100 S.W. 138 , 10 L.R. A.(N.S.) 681.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ponderosa Pine Energy, LLC v. Tenaska Energy, Inc.

    376 S.W.3d 358 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Aug 20, 2012

    Standard of Review We review the trial court’s order vacating the arbitration award de novo based on a review of the entire record. 7 Alim v. KBR (Kellogg, Brown & Root)-Halliburton, 331 S.W.3d 178, 181 (Tex.App. … Bank, FSB v.

    Reversed by Tenaska Energy, Inc. v. Ponderosa Pine Energy, LLC, 57 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 617 (2014)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hoefling v. City of San Antonio

    15 Tex. Civ. App. 257 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 20, 1897

    In Stuart v. Palmer, 74 N. … County of Santa Clara v. Railway, 18 Fed. Rep., 410.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Gieb v. Goebel Brewing Co.

    176 S.W.2d 975 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 10, 1943

    Co. v. Texas Pipe Line Co., Tex.Civ.App., 240 S.W. 990 , writ refused; Brown v. Brown, Tex.Civ.App., 30 S.W.2d 1110 , writ refused; Corn v. First Texas Joint Stock Land Bank, Tex.Civ.App., 131 S.W.2d 752 , writ refused. … Hernandez v. Garcia, Tex.Civ.App., 216 S.W. 477 ; Ed Maher, Inc., v. Morris, Tex.Civ.App., 67 S.W.2d 340 ; and Brown v. Brown, Tex.Civ.App., 30 S.W.2d 1110 , writ refused.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Barnhart Independent School District v. Mertzon Independent School District

    464 S.W.2d 197 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 10, 1971

    Therefore the Board of County School Trustees of Irion County had jurisdiction *201 to act. Bell v. Kirkland, 41 S.W.2d 443 (Tex.Civ.App.1931, error ref.). … In considering whether or not the Board’s action was arbitrary the substantial evidence rule is applicable. Rock Island Independent School District No. 907 v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brannon v. Pacific Employers Ins. Co.

    235 S.W.2d 669 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 7, 1950

    Nicholson v. Mills; Tex.Civ.App., 227 S.W.2d 354 ; Spence v. State National Bank, Tex.Com.App., 5 S.W.2d 754, 756 ; J. Weingarten, Inc., v. Sanchez, Tex.Civ.App., 228 S.W.2d 303 ; Panos v. Foley Bros. … Ass’n v. Knouff, Tex.Civ.App., 271 S.W. 633, 636 , writ refused. “A compromise agreement under the act is in the nature of an accord, and a settlement there *672 under' in the nature of a satisfaction thereof.” Id.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Morton Salt Co. v. Wells

    35 S.W.2d 454 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 25, 1930

    Co. v. Denton (Tex. Civ. App.) 16 S.W.(2d) 932, 934 ; People’s Ice Co. v. Nowling (Tex. Civ. App.) 16 S.W.(2d) 976, 979 ; Fort Worth, etc., Co. v. Russell (Tex. Civ. App.) 28 S.W.(2d) 320, 326, 327 ; Tracey v. … Co. v. Cocke, 64 Tex. 156 ; G., H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Kutac, 76 Tex. 477 , 13 S. W. 327 ; Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Ford (Tex. Civ. App.) 14 S.W.(2d) 97, 99 ; Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. v. Shuford, 72 Tex. 165 , 10 S.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • South Texas Industrial Services, Inc. v. Texas Department of Water Resources

    573 S.W.2d 302 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 1, 1978

    See, e. g., Railroad Commission v. Aluminum Co. of America, 380 S.W.2d 599 (Tex.1964); Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. New Process Production Co., 129 Tex. 617 , 104 S.W.2d 1106 (1937); Railroad Commission v. … Stewart v. Smith, 126 Tex. 292 , 83 S.W.2d 945 (1935); Chenoweth v. Railroad Commission, 184 S.W.2d 711 (Tex.Civ.App.1944, writ ref'd w. o. m.), Edgar v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.