Case law

Bozeman v. Morrow

34 S.W.2d 654 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 8, 1931

Goodman v. School District No. 1, City and County of Denver et al. (C. C. A.) 32 F. (2d) 586, 63 A. L. R. 92. … City of Dallas et al. v. Mosely (Tex. Civ. App.) 286 S. W. 497 ; Moseley v. City of Dallas (Tex. Com. App.) 17 S.W.(2d) 36 ; Goodman v. School District, supra, and cases there referred to; City of New Braunfels v.

National Pipe & Tube Co. v. Liberty County Central Appraisal District

805 S.W.2d 593 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 28, 1991

Webb County Appraisal District v. New Laredo Hotel, Inc., 792 S.W.2d 952 (Tex.1990). … We feel it important to set forth in this opinion pertinent parts of the Liberty County Central Appraisal District’s Appraisal Review Board’s ruling, entitled “Board of Review Hearing”, as follows: THE BOARD OF REVIEW OF

Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Fricker

16 S.W.2d 390 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 20, 1929

Co. v. Bailey (Tex. Civ. App.) 297 S. … Co. v.

Barnhart Ind. Sch. Dist. v. Mertzon Ind. Sch. Dist.

464 S.W.2d 197 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 10, 1971

Therefore the Board of County School Trustees of Irion County had jurisdiction *201 to act. Bell v. Kirkland, 41 S.W.2d 443 (Tex.Civ.App.1931, error ref.). … In considering whether or not the Board's action was arbitrary the substantial evidence rule is applicable. Rock Island Independent School District No. 907 v.

Avila v. State

884 S.W.2d 896 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 21, 1994

Brown v. State, 507 S.W.2d 235, 238 (Tex.Crim.App.1974); see also Price v. … Tex.Code CRIM.PROcAnn. art. 27.14(a) (Vernon 1989); see also Brown, 507 S.W.2d at 238 ; Foster v. State, 422 S.W.2d 447, 448 (Tex.CrimApp.1967).

City of Garland v. Wentzel

294 S.W.2d 145 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 20, 1956

Thus in Leeson v. … See also Rives v. James, Tex.Civ.App., 3 S.W.2d 932 ; Ingram v. Central Bitulithic Co.; Tex.Civ.App., 51 S.W.2d 1067 ; Dimmitt Elevator Co; v. Carter, Tex.Civ.App.; 70 S.W.2d 615 .

Patterson v. Dunigan Tool & Supply Co.

143 S.W.2d 802 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 27, 1940

Lanford v. Smith, Chief Justice, 128 Tex. 373 , 99 S.W.2d 593 ; Ætna Life Ins. Co. v. Gallagher, 127 Tex. 553 , 94 S.W.2d 410 ; Brown v. Cox, Tex.Civ.App., 53 S.W.2d 848 ; Bramblett v. … Cases so holding are Berry v. Pierce Pet. Corp., 120 Tex. 452 , 39 S.W.2d 824 ; Citics Service Oil Co. v. Brown, 119 Tex. 242 , 27 S.W.2d 115 ; Brison v.

McRae v. Lindale Independent School District

450 S.W.2d 118 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 15, 1970

.); James v. Board of Trustees of Eagle Pass Independent School District, 376 S.W.2d 956 (Tex.Civ.App., San Antonio, 1964, n. w. h.). … .); Blair v. Board of Trustees, Trinity Independent School District, supra; 44 Texas Law Review 1309, 1325-Note 130 (1966).

Order of Railway Conductors of America v. Quigley

83 S.W.2d 701 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 14, 1935

Co. v. Young, 86 Ala. 424, 430 , 5 So. 116 , 118, 11 Am. St. Rep. 51 . … Brown v. Binz [Tex. Civ. App.] 50 S. W. 483 ; Gray v. Smith, 83 F. 824 , 28 C. C. A. 168 .” First Texas Prudential Ins. Co. v. Ryan (Tex. Civ. App.) 48 S.W.(2d) 750 . The rule is also stated in 32 C.

Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Schoeppel

10 S.W.2d 405 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 4, 1928

Ass’n v. Martin (Tex. Civ. App.) 296 S. W. 639 ; Texas Ins. Ass’n v. Davies (Tex. Civ. App.) 6 S.W.(2d) 792 . … Ass’n v. Nelson (Tex. Civ. App.) 292 S.

Bexar County v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.

213 S.W.2d 882 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 15, 1948

Johnson v. … In Brundrett v. Lucas, Tex.Civ.App., 194 S.W. 613, 617 , wr. ref., this Court in dealing wtih a similar situation, and speaking by Mr.

Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Downing

218 S.W. 112 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 26, 1919

Co. v. … board.

Texas Indem. Ins. Co. v. Pemberton

9 S.W.2d 65 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 27, 1928

Employers’ Insurance Association v. Nelson (Tex. Civ. App.) 292 S. W. 651 ; Hood v. Texas Employers’ Association (Tex. Civ. App.) 260 S. W. 243 ; Texas Employers’ Insurance Association v. Nunamaker (Tex. Civ. … Co. v. Cooper, 70 Tex. 67 , 8 S. W. 68 ; Dillingham v. Scales, 78 Tex. 205 , 14 S. W. 566 ; Willis v. McNeill, 57 Tex. 474 ; T. & P. Ry. Co. v. Garcia, 62 Tex. 285 ; Blum v. Simpson, 66 Tex. 84 , 17 S. W. 402 ; Moss v.

Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Davis

32 S.W.2d 240 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 2, 1930

That after due notice was given to all interested parties, the board heard his claim under the style of R. IT. Davis, Employee, v. … Co. v. Hogland, 297 S.

City of Dallas v. Couchman

249 S.W. 234 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 10, 1923

Dallas Levee District No. 3 v. Sam Ayers, 246 S.W. 1112 (recently decided by this court, but not yet [officially] published); King v. Commissioners' Court, 10 Tex. Civ. App. 114 , 30 S.W. 257 . … City of Dallas v. Dallas Con. Selc. Ry., 105 Tex. 337 , 148 S.W. 292 ; Garitty v. Halbert (Tex. Civ. App.) 225 S.W. 196 .

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Jackson

139 S.W.2d 631 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 29, 1940

In Booth v. … In Jones v. Texas Employers Ins.

Keyker v. Watson

291 S.W. 957 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 2, 1927

Dickson v. Strickland, 114 Tex. 176 , 265 S. W. 1012 . … Kennison et al. v. Du Plantis et al. (Tex. Civ. App.) 220 S. W. 118 .

Stronck v. Stronck

538 S.W.2d 854 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 30, 1976

Brown v. Brown, 520 S.W.2d 571, 576 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston [14th Dist.j 1975, no writ). … Brown v. Brown, 520 S.W.2d at 576 .

Keech v. State

707 S.W.2d 178 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 27, 1986

Brown v. State, 640 S.W.2d 275 (Tex.Crim.App.1982); Easter, 536 S.W.2d at 227 . … See Brown v. State, 475 S.W.2d 938, 955 (Tex.Crim.App.1971). Third, it must appear that the State has not refuted the exculpatory statement. See Medina v. State, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 16 , 296 S.W.2d 273, 274 (1956).

Appell Petroleum Corp. v. G. W. Townsend Lease Service

375 S.W.2d 547 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 6, 1964

Banks v. Collins, 152 Tex. 265 , 257 S.W.2d 97 ; Lambert Corporation v. Martin, Tex.Civ.App., 369 S.W.2d 703 , writ dism. That appellant is a private corporation is an admitted fact and hence not in issue. … Wood v. Self, Tex.Civ.App., 362 S.W.2d 188 , n. w. h; McCormick & Ray, Texas Law of Evidence, Vol. 1, § 31. W. H.