Case law

West Texas Produce Co. v. Pate

64 S.W.2d 381 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 13, 1933

Dallas Hotel Co. v. Davison (Tex. Com. App.) 23 S.W.(2d) 708 . … In the case óf Copp v.

Hart v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n

42 S.W.2d 798 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 30, 1931

It is held in Mingus v. Wadley, 115 Tex. 551 , 285 S. … Anthony v. Smithson, 70 Kan. 132 , 78 P. 454 ; Kleiner v. O’Kelley, 22 N. M. 624, 167 P. 1 ; Braender Rubber & Tire Co. v. Dueth-Henes Corp., 207 Ill. App. 155 ; Simmons v. Harris, 7 Baxt. (Tenn.) 325 .

Traders & General Ins. v. O'Quinn

111 S.W.2d 859 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 16, 1937

Co. v. … Co. v.

Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Bailey

297 S.W. 1042 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 22, 1927

in the same manner as does said section 7 of article 8307, the Beaumont Court of Civil Appeals has expressly held, in Scott v. … We do not consider that the rule laid down in the Producers' Oil Co. v. Daniels is conclusive in this case, if applicable at all. In that case the act of 1913 was under *Page 1045 consideration.

Navarro Independent School District v. Brockette

566 S.W.2d 699 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 10, 1978

See Texas State Board of Pharmacy v. Kittman, 550 S.W.2d 104 (Tex.Civ.App. Tyler 1977, no writ); Superior Oil Company v. Railroad Commission of Texas, 519 S.W.2d 479 (Tex.Civ.App. … .); Stanfield v. Texas Department of Public Safety, 422 S.W.2d 14 (Tex.Civ.App. Dallas 1967, writ ref’d n.r.e.).

JOHN L. HAMMOND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. State

299 S.W.2d 163 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 13, 1957

Appellant relies upon the following quotation from Cleveland v. … The court on such appeal was not authorized to hear or determine issues not embraced within the action taken by the Board and made the subject of appeal. . Cleveland v.

Garcia v. Texas Employer's Insurance Ass'n

597 S.W.2d 519 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 27, 1980

Co. v. LaCoke, 585 S.W.2d 678 (Tex.Sup.1979); Ward v. Charter Oak Fire Ins. Co., 579 S.W.2d 909 (Tex.Sup.1979). See also Cole v. Texas Employment Commission, 563 S.W.2d 363 (Tex.Civ.App. … —Fort Worth 1978, writ dism’d ); Crosland v. Texas Employment Commission, 550 S.W.2d 314 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1977, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Texas Employment Commission v. Hartzheim, 549 S.W.2d 770 (Tex.Civ.App.

Texas Employers' Ins. v. Jimenez

267 S.W. 752 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 19, 1924

presented for the Board’s adjudication. … Ry. v. Henefy (Tex. Civ. App.) 99 S. W. 884 ; Ry. v. Mills, 34 Tex. Civ. App. 127 , 78 S. W. 11 ; Ry. v. Bohan (Tex. Civ. App.) 47 S. W. 1050 .

Kenedy v. Schultz

6 Tex. Civ. App. 461 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 28, 1894

Medical Assn. v. Schrader, 55 N. W. Rep., 24 ; Gee Wo v. The State, 54 N. W. Rep., 513 ; The State v. Carey, 30 Pac. Rep., 729 ; The State v. Randolph, 31 Pac. Rep., 201 ; The State v. Van Doran, 14 S. E. … Gardner v. Tatum, 22 Pac. Rep., 880 ; Roberts v. Levy, 31 Pac. Rep., 570 .

Red Ball Oxygen Company, Inc. v. Southwest Railroad Car Parts Company and Air Liquide Industrial U.S., L.P.

523 S.W.3d 288 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 31, 2017

Brown v. Brown, 236 S.W.3d 343, 348 (Tex. App.−Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.). … See Brown, 236 S.W.3d at 348. We overrule Red Ball’s fourth issue.

Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Neal

11 S.W.2d 847 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 16, 1928

As stated in the opinion by Judge Speer in Vestal v. … In the case of Ezell v.

State Ex Rel. Rea v. Etheridge

20 S.W.2d 808 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 20, 1929

Commissioner v. Smith, 5 Tex. 471 ; Burnam v. Terrell, 97 Tex. 309 , 78 S. W. 500 ; Boynton v. Brown (Tex. Civ. App.) 164 S. W. 893 . … In addition to State v. Goowin, supra, and Scarbrough v.

Hayden v. Tyler Oil Corporation

6 S.W.2d 777 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 18, 1928

Brown, to drill for oil upon the property covered by its lease. … McClellan v. Haley (Tex. Com. App.) 250 S. W. 413 ; Burk Burnett-Mann Oil Co. v. Robertson (Tex. Civ. App.) 240 S. W. 1046 ; Huffman v. Mc *778 Donald (Tex. Civ. App.) 261 S. W. 146 ; Atkinson v. Jackson Brothers (Tex.

Cousins v. Pullman Co.

72 S.W.2d 356 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 19, 1934

of adjusters, and, being denied a satisfactory adjustment by each of these tribunals, presented the matter to the United States Board of Mediation, alleging in this connection “that the Board of Mediation does not adjudicate … Co. v. Booker (Tex. Civ. App.) 5 S.W.(2d) 856, 859 ; Caulfield v. Yazoo & M. V. R. Co., 170 La. 155 , 127 So. 585 , and authorities cited. Harrison v. Pullman Co. (C. C. A.) 68 F.(2d) 826 .

Beaurline v. Smith

426 S.W.2d 295 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 29, 1968

Jur.2d, § 3 and § 4, pp. 520 and 522; Johnson v. State Board of Morticians, Tex.Civ. App., 288 S.W.2d 214 . The previous suit brought by Theser was for specific performance. … Hargrove, Tex.Civ.App., 351 S.W.2d 666 ; Sullivan v. O’Brien, Tex.Civ.App., 85 S.W.2d 1106 , err. ref.; MRKVA v. Slovak, Tex.Civ.App., 107 S.W.2d 923 ; Browning v.

Traders & General Ins. Co. v. Porter

124 S.W.2d 900 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 2, 1938

Ass'n v. Brock, Tex.Com.App., 36 S.W.2d 704 ; Bankers' Lloyds v. Seymour, Tex. Civ. App. 49 S.W.2d 508 ; Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Ray, Tex. Civ. App. 68 S.W.2d 290 . … Co. v. Thibodeaux, 129 Tex. 655 , 106 S.W.2d 268 ; Traders General Ins. Co. v. Shanks, Tex. Civ. App. 83 S.W.2d 781 , writ refused; Traders General Ins. Co. v. Babb, Tex. Civ.

Mott v. Ruenbuhl

1 White & W. 320 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 8, 1877

[Williams v. Bradbury, 9 Tex. 487 ; Shelby v. Burtis, 18 Tex. 644 ; Kegans v. Allcorn, 9 Tex. 34 .] § 600. Administrator de bonis non; duties of. … Appellant presented his claim to the administrator of Brown for one-fourth the amount due from Brown to Pfleger’s estate. This claim was rejected, and this suit at once instituted.

Greater Fort Worth & Tarrant County Community Action Agency v. Mims

618 S.W.2d 942 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 2, 1981

In Professional Services, Inc. v. Amaitis, 592 S.W.2d 396 (Tex.Civ.App. … See also Thomas v. Callaway, 251 S.W.2d 921 (Tex.Civ.App.

Prince v. Inman

280 S.W.2d 779 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 26, 1955

Kimbrough v. Barnett, 93 Tex. 301 , 55 S.W. 120 ; Miller v. Coffee, Tex.Civ.App., 17 S.W.2d 1100 ; Lamb v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 267 S.W.2d 285 . … Owens v. Stovall, Tex.Civ.App., 64 S.W.2d 360 , quoting from Warren v. Thomaston, 43 Me. 406 , 69 Am.Dec. 69. In the case, of Major v.

Vance v. Miller

170 S.W. 838 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 29, 1914

In view of another trial, it may be well to add: In Chambers v. … Appellees, in their motion for rehearing, insist that the opinion rendered in this case is in conflict with Railway Co. v. Blum Independent School District, 143 S.W. 353 , Underwood v. Childress, Ind.