Case law

Clevenger v. Mayfield

86 S.W. 1062 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 12, 1905

Vercher, V. Carnahan, E. De la Cerda, J. De la Cerda, L. Thomasee, W. Thomasee, E. De la Cerda, H. Hermandees, D. Valery, A. Carnahan, and of the defendants John T. Garrison, S. W. Blount, J. T. Brown, and J. P. … The only matter suggested by this motion which we think merits further discussion is the point that the opinion goes contrary to the principle of law laid down in La Vega v. League, 64 Tex. 217 , and James v.

City of Dallas v. Gaechter

524 S.W.2d 400 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 24, 1975

See City of Hutchins v. Prasifka, 450 S.W.2d 829, 835 (Tex.1970). Second, an estoppel, if allowed in this case, would preclude the Gaechter’s right to appeal to the Board of Adjustment. In City of Amarillo v. … In City of San Angelo v.

Wichita Common School Dist. No. 11 v. Dickens Independent School Dist. of Dickens County

206 S.W.2d 885 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 13, 1947

George v. Baker, 120 Tex. 307 , 40 S.W.2d 41 ; Lynn County School Board v. Garlynn Common County Line School Dist., Tex.Civ.App., 118 S.W.2d 1070 . … No. 1 v. Hays, Tex.Civ.App., 128 S.W.2d 535 ; Peterson v. Taylor, 15 Ga. 483 , 60 Am.Dec. 705; Meridian Nat. Bank v. Hoyt & Bros.

Texaco Country Club v. Wade

163 S.W.2d 219 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 7, 1942

Co. v. … Co. v.

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of Baltimore v. Parsons

226 S.W. 418 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 16, 1920

Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Parker, 217 S. W. 195 ; Roach v. Employers’ Ins. Ass’n, 195 S. W. 328 ; Am. Indemnity Co. v. Hubbard, 196 S. W. 1011 ; Gen. Accident, Fire & Life Assur. Corp., Limited, v. Evans, 201 S. W 705. … In Roach v. Employers’ Ins.

Kilgore v. Texas Real Estate Commission

565 S.W.2d 114 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 13, 1978

Kost v. Texas Real Estate Commission, 359 S.W.2d 306 (Tex.Civ.App.—Texarkana 1962, writ ref’d). … Texas Real Estate Commission v. Bentley, 253 S.W.2d 325 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1952, no writ).

Hicks v. Thompson

207 S.W.2d 1000 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 15, 1948

Berryman v. Pullman Co., D.C., 48 F.Supp. 542 ; Railroad Yardmasters of North America v, Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co., D.C., 39 F. Supp. 876 ; Switchmen’s Union of North America v. … National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 ; General Committee v. Southern Pacific Co., 320 U. S. 338 , 64 S.Ct. 142 , 88 L.Ed. 85 ; General Committee, etc., v. Missouri-K-T R.

State v. Brunson

435 S.W.2d 242 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 27, 1968

Brown v. Guaranty Securities Co., Tex.Com.App., 265 S.W. 547 , holding approved by Sup.Ct.; Ford Motor Co. v. Freeman, Tex.Civ.App., 168 S.W. 80 ; Hyway Motor Co. v. Saulsbury, Tex.Civ.App., 223 S. … In Brown v. Spector, Tex.Civ.App., 70 S.

Ector County Independent School District v. Hopkins Ex Rel. Hopkins

518 S.W.2d 576 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 18, 1974

In Farrell v. … Betts v. Board of Education of City of Chicago, 466 F.2d 629 (7th Cir. 1972).

DeLeon v. Western Casualty Co.

114 S.W.2d 274 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 18, 1938

Ass’n v. … Tally v. Texas Employers Ins. Ass’n, supra.

Underwood v. Sabinal Independent School Dist.

275 S.W. 267 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 12, 1925

Donna Independent School Dist. v. Bank (Tex. Civ. App.) 227 S. W. 974 ; South San Antonio School Dist. v. Martine (Tex. Civ. App.) 275 S. W. 265 . … Bevers v. Winfrey (Tex. Civ. App.) 260 S. W. 627, 635 , at 632.

County Trustees of Navarro County v. Bell Point Common School Dist.

229 S.W. 697 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 12, 1921

This is the effect of our Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Jennings v. Carson, 220 S. W. 1090 . … The fact that in the Jennings v.

Security Union Ins. Co. v. Reed

42 S.W.2d 494 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 10, 1931

Co. v. Curtis [Tex. Civ. App.] 200 S. … But, under this new legislation, as construed by the Amarillo Court of Civil Appeals in Heatley v. W. P.

Allen v. Emery Independent School Dist.

283 S.W. 674 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 1, 1926

Duck v. Peeler, 11 S. W. 1111 , 74 Tex. 268 . … Duck v. Peeler, supra. At least the finding of value by the board could not be collaterally attacked, as here; the action of the board not being fraudulent or merely arbitrary.

Hermann v. Thomas

168 S.W. 1037 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 9, 1914

V brs. N. 55 deg. … App. 121 , 81 S.W. 781 ; Booth v. Upshur, 26 Tex. 64 ; Upshur Co. v. Lewright, 101 S.W. 1013 ; Thompson v. Langdon, 87 Tex. 258 , 28 S.W. 931 ; Johnson v.

Southern Surety Co. v. Nelson

223 S.W. 298 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 22, 1920

This was the holding by the Oourt of Oivil Appeals for the Sixth District in the cases of Insurance Co. v. House, 191 S. W. 155 , and Roach v. Texas Employers’ Association, 195 S. … This question was decided adversely to appellant in the case of Surety Co. v. Stubbs, 199 S.

Georgia Casualty Co. v. McClure

239 S.W. 644 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 22, 1922

Dalton v. Railway Co., 113 Mo. App. 71 , 87 S. W. 610 ; McGhee v. Maxey (Tex. Civ. App.) 230 S. W. 735 ; Doak v. Biggs (Tex. Civ. App.) 235 S. W. 957 . … E. 893 ; Weekes v. William Stead, Ltd., 6 Neg. Comp. Cas. 1010; Employers’ Indemnity Corp. v. Kirkpatrick (Tex. Civ. App.) 214 S. W. 956 ; Lumbermen’s Reciprocal Ass’n v. Behnken (Tex. Civ. App.) 226 S.

Council of Co-Owners of Saida II Towers Condominium Ass'n v. Texas Catastrophe Property Insurance Ass'n

696 S.W.2d 60 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 29, 1985

V, § 1 (1985); Board of Water Engineers v. McKnight, 111 Tex. 82 , 229 S.W. 301 (Tex. 1921); City of Houston v. Lurie, 148 Tex. 391 , 224 S.W.2d 871 (Tex.1949). … Co. v. State Board of Ins., supra.

Moses v. Fort Worth Independent School District

977 S.W.2d 851 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 8, 1998

board of trustees, or a board subcommittee unless the commissioner determines that the irregularity or error was likely to have led to an eiToneous decision by the board or board subcommittee. 12 A plain reading of the statute … See Cummins v. Lowry, 691 S.W.2d 582, 584 (Tex.1985); Texas Dep't of Pub. Safety v. Mendoza, 956 S.W.2d 808, 811 (Tex.App.—Houston [14 th Dist.] 1997, no pet.). 3 . See Connors v. Connors, 796 S.W.2d 233, 237 (Tex.App.

Southern Underwriters v. Boswell

141 S.W.2d 442 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 3, 1940

Prayer was that the award of the Board be set aside and that he be given judgment for the maximum sum of $20 per week for 400 weeks, and that payment be required in a lump sum. … Brown, Tex.Civ.App., 110 S.W.2d 130 ; Traders & General Ins. Co. v. Baker, Tex.Civ.App., 111 S.W.2d 837 , writ dismissed. We have read the cases cited and believe they pronounce a correct rule.