Case law

Grace v. Structural Pest Control Bd. of Tex.

620 S.W.2d 157 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 28, 1981

Lewis v. Metropolitan S. & L. Ass’n, Tex., 550 S.W.2d 11 . Plaintiff asserts that he was denied due process of law in the appointment of a “hearing examiner” to conduct the Board’s hearing. … Board.

Dowd v. Dowd

359 S.W.2d 287 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 24, 1962

Appellant, in seeking a .reversal, relies principally upon the cases of Cities Service Oil Company v. Brown, 119 Tex. 242 , 27 S.W.2d 115 ; Harrison v. … We think this case is more closely akin to the case of Yell v. Prock, Tex.Civ.App., 238 S.W.2d 238 , wr. dism., and authorities cited therein, than to the Brown, Harrison and Coffield cases. In Yell v.

Garsee v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America

47 S.W.2d 654 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 18, 1932

Lumbermen’s Reciprocal Ass’n v. Henderson (Tex. Com. App.) 15 S.W.(2d) 565 ; Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. Kelley (Tex. Civ. App.) 44 S.W.(2d) 756 . … L. p. 296, § 60; Moreland v. Atchison, 19 Tex. 303 ; Holt v. Gordon (Tex. Civ. App.) 176 S. W. 902 ; Schaeffer v. Blanc (Tex. Civ. App.) 87 S. W. 745 (writ refused).

Crank v. State

658 S.W.2d 182 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 14, 1983

Crank cites Powell v. … Crank cites the case of Ullmen v.

City of Dallas v. Gaechter

524 S.W.2d 400 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 24, 1975

See City of Hutchins v. Prasifka, 450 S.W.2d 829, 835 (Tex.1970). Second, an estoppel, if allowed in this case, would preclude the Gaechter’s right to appeal to the Board of Adjustment. In City of Amarillo v. … In City of San Angelo v.

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Schoonmaker

181 S.W. 263 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 2, 1915

Co. v. Karr et al., 5 Tex. Civ. App. 60 , 24 S. W. 302 ; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Landry, 108 S. W. 461 ; Tel. Co. v. Brown, 58 Tex. 170 , 44 Am. Rep. 610 ; Railway Co. v. Cowser, 57 Tex. 306 . … Co. v. Brown, 234 U. S. 542 , 34 Sup. Ct. 955, 58 L. Ed. 1457 ; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Bilisoly, 116 Va. 562 , 82 S. E. 91 ; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Compton, 114 Ark. 193 , 169 S. W. 946 ; Western Union Tel. Co. v.

San Antonio Cattle Loan v. Blalack Son

256 S.W. 974 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 21, 1923

Hicks v. Morris, 57 Tex. 658 ; Dillon v. Kauffman, 58 Tex. 696 ; Joiner v. Perkins, 59 Tex. 300 ; Eylar v. Eylar, 60 Tex. 315 ; Faires v. Cockerell, 88 Tex. 428 , 31 S. W. 190 , 639, 28 L. R. A. 528; Railway v. … Browne, secretary of the Loan Company, and by Herman Lichte.

Keystone RV Co. v. Texas Department of Motor Vehicles

507 S.W.3d 829 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 10, 2016

(citing Jaster v. … See Hooks v.

Alford v. Cole

65 S.W.2d 813 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 16, 1933

Brown’s being made a party to the suit. … Brown will not be bound by the judgment in the present suit, but he is not an indispensable party to the judgment. Stewart v. Kemp, 54 Tex. 248 ; Heirs of Tevis v. Armstrong, 71 Tex. 59 , 9 S. W. 134 ; Patton v. Tex.

Allen v. Emery Independent School Dist.

283 S.W. 674 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 1, 1926

Duck v. Peeler, 11 S. W. 1111 , 74 Tex. 268 . … Duck v. Peeler, supra. At least the finding of value by the board could not be collaterally attacked, as here; the action of the board not being fraudulent or merely arbitrary.

Hausmann v. Texas Savings & Loan Ass'n

585 S.W.2d 796 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 27, 1979

The Deed of Trust executed by the Browns was to L. Holt Magee as Trustee, the Browns therein making the following pertinent covenants and agreements: 6. … Hutson v. Sadler, 501 S.W.2d 728 (Tex.Civ.App. — Tyler 1973, no writ).

Texas Reciprocal Ins. Ass'n v. Leger

92 S.W.2d 482 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 27, 1936

Cleveland v. … Co. v.

Clymer v. Terry

50 Tex. Civ. App. 300 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 18, 1908

Brown, on two promissory notes executed *301 on January 8, 1904, by W. P. … Brown, purchased the land for which the notes were given as a part of the purchase money, and assumed and agreed to pay said notes and that by reason thereof, Brown became primarily liable therefor.

Pierce v. City of Jacksonville

403 S.W.2d 512 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 12, 1966

Simkins v. City of Corsicana, supra; Druesdow v. Baker, supra; State v. Houser, supra; State v. Whittenburg, 153 Tex. 205 , 265 S.W.2d 569 . … However, if the Board’s values cannot be said to be grossly in excess of the jury’s finding, the Board’s findings would not be void. In Whelan v.

Moses v. Fort Worth Independent School District

977 S.W.2d 851 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 8, 1998

board of trustees, or a board subcommittee unless the commissioner determines that the irregularity or error was likely to have led to an eiToneous decision by the board or board subcommittee. 12 A plain reading of the statute … See Cummins v. Lowry, 691 S.W.2d 582, 584 (Tex.1985); Texas Dep't of Pub. Safety v. Mendoza, 956 S.W.2d 808, 811 (Tex.App.—Houston [14 th Dist.] 1997, no pet.). 3 . See Connors v. Connors, 796 S.W.2d 233, 237 (Tex.App.

Kingsbury v. Phillips

142 S.W. 73 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 9, 1911

Brown was also made a party defendant. … See Joy v. Ft. Worth Compress Co., 24 Tex. Civ. App. 94 , 58 S. W. 174 , and authorities there cited.

Ross v. Texas Catastrophe Property Insurance Ass'n

770 S.W.2d 641 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 10, 1989

Mahon v. Vandygriff, 578 S.W.2d 144, 147 (Tex.Civ.App.1979, writ ref’d n.r.e.). … Both Leisure Services, Inc. v. Texas Catastrophe Property Insurance Assoc., 712 S.W.2d 266 (Tex.App.1986, writ ref’d n.r.e.) and Southern Union Gas Co. v.

Bennett v. State

686 S.W.2d 235 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 31, 1984

Brown v. State, 657 S.W.2d 797, 798-99 (Tex.Crim.App.1983). … Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. at 599 , 95 S.Ct. at 2259 (emphasis added in Brown), quoting Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 486 , 83 S.Ct. 407, 416 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963).

Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Williamson

59 S.W.2d 232 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 16, 1933

Holloway v. Texas, etc. (Tex. Com. App.) 40 S.W.(2d) 75 ; New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Scott (Tex. Civ. App.) 54 S.W.(2d) 175 . … Zurich, etc., v. Walker (Tex. Com. App.) 35 S.W.(2d) 115 .

Armstrong v. State

838 S.W.2d 323 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 22, 1992

Brown testified about various statements she said Stephens made to her during voir dire and in a telephone conversation when Brown called Stephens at her home during the trial. … The trial judge, as the trier of fact, was free to disbelieve Brown’s testimony and to believe that of the other witnesses. McCartney v. State, 542 S.W.2d 156, 162 (Tex.Crim.App.1976).