Case law

Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. State

524 S.W.2d 313 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 15, 1975

In support of this contention, defendant cites Western Alfalfa Corp. v. Air Pollution Variance Board, 534 P.2d 796 (Colo.App.1975). We conclude that defendants have not been denied due process. … It relies on Railway Express Agency v. Spain, 249 S.W.2d 644, 653 (Tex.Civ.App.

Whitmarsh v. Buckley

324 S.W.2d 298 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 23, 1959

In the case of Prince v. … Southern Canal Company v. State Board of Water Engineers, Tex., 318 S.W.2d 619 .

Allen v. Denman

278 S.W. 899 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 28, 1925

Irwin v. Williar, 110 U.S. 499 , 4 S.Ct. 160 , 28 L.Ed. 225 . In the case of Embrey v. … Henne Meyer v. Moultry, 97 Tex. 216 , 77 S.W. 608 ; Willoughby v. Townsend, 93 Tex. 80 , 53 S.W. 581 ; Arno Co-op. Irr. Co. v. Pugh (Tex.Com.App.) 212 S.W. 470 ; Houston Belt Terminal Ry. v.

Haddad v. Boon

609 S.W.2d 609 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 26, 1980

See Brown v. Havard, 593 S.W.2d 939, 944 (Tex.1980). The deed sought to be reformed in Miles had been executed almost six years prior to filing of the action. … As stated in Fambrough v.

Jacobs v. City of Denison

251 S.W.2d 804 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 18, 1952

Co. of Texas, Tex.Civ.App., 56 S.W.2d 922 , syl. 3; Malott v. … And in Hartwell Iron Works v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Ry. Co., supra [ 56 S.W.2d 925 ], also referred to in Lee v.

Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. Robinson

91 S.W.2d 1147 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 31, 1936

Ass’n v. … Among those decisions are Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hipp (Tex.Civ.App.) 22 S.W.(2d) 147 ; Travelers’ Insurance Co. v.

Roach v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n

195 S.W. 328 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 23, 1917

And in the ease of Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. House,. 191 S. W. 155 , we construed the above article, and still adhere to the interpretation of the article as there given. … Jones et al. v. Dodd, 192 S. W. 1134 .

Lacour v. Continental Casualty Co.

163 S.W.2d 676 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 11, 1942

In the case of Great American Indemnity Co. v. … Ass’n. v. Mitchell, Tex.Civ.App., 142 S.W.2d 626 ; Johnson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corporation, 131 Tex. 357 , 112 S.W.2d 449, 450 ; Employers Liability Assurance Corporation v.

Crabb v. Celeste Independent School Dist.

132 S.W. 890 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 19, 1910

Scarbrough v. Eubank, 93 Tex. 106 , 53 S. W. 573 . … St. 1006, pp. 441-442; El Paso v. Ruckman, 92 Tex. 86 , 46 S. W. 25 ; Graham v. Greenville, 67 Tex. 62 , 2 S. W. 742 ; Railway v. Bratcher, 118 S. W. 1091 ; 25 Am. & Eng.

Jarrett v. Travelers' Ins. Co.

66 S.W.2d 415 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 15, 1933

Ass’n v. Jimenez (Tex. Civ. App.) 267 S. W. 752, 754 . … Ass’n v. Haney (Tex. Civ. App.) 28 S.W.(2d) 850 ; Millers’ Indemnity Underwriters v. Hughes (Tex. Civ. App.) 256 S. W. 334 ; Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. Cary (Tex. Com. App.) 25 S.W.(2d) 302 ; Texas Employers’ Ins.

Martin v. Grandview Independent School Dist.

266 S.W. 607 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 16, 1924

Brenham v. Bradshaw, 53 Texas, 337 , 37 Am. Rep. 758 ; Graham v. City of Greenville, 67 Texas, 62 ; City of El Paso v. Ruckman, 92 Texas, 89 .” … case of Jenkins v.

Havner v. Meno

867 S.W.2d 130 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 19, 1994

Railroad Comm’n v. Lone Star Gas Co., 844 S.W.2d 679, 685 (Tex.1992); Gerst v. Oak Cliff Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 432 S.W.2d 702, 706 (Tex.1968). … Hernandez v. Meno, 828 S.W.2d at 494 (citations omitted). Without notifying Havner of the hearing requirement or scheduling the matter for a hearing, the board refused to set aside the stricter criteria.

In the Interest of B.T.G.

494 S.W.3d 839 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 6, 2016

Bank v. … As the concurring opinion in Brown v. Brown, 917 S.W.2d 358 (Tex.App.

Harris v. Foster

261 S.W.2d 860 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 14, 1953

First State Bank of Roby v. … Pioneer Building & Loan Ass’n v. Gray, 132 Tex. 509 , 125 S.W.2d 284 ; Tarrant v. Walker, 140 Tex. 249 , 166 S.W.2d 900 .” Italics ours. In Tarrant v.

City of Jefferson v. Marshall National Bank

18 Tex. Civ. App. 539 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 12, 1898

Under the authority of Bassett v. El Paso, 88 .Texas, 168, the levy would seem to be sufficient. … Voorhees v. Houston, 70 Texas, 331 ; Mayor v. Voorhees, 70 Texas, 363 . 4.

Texas & N. O. R. v. Churchill

74 S.W.2d 1030 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 11, 1934

Railway Co. v. Brown, 16 Tex. Civ. App. 93 , 40 S. W. 608, 609 ; A., T. & S. F. Railway Co. v. Click (Tex. Civ. App.) 32 S. W. 226 ; Railway Co. v. Rose, 19 Tex. Civ. App. 470 , 49 S. W. 133 ; Gulf, C. & S. F. … Co. v. Coker (Tex. Civ. App.) 135 S. W. 179 ; Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Thompson (Tex. Civ. App.) 286 S. W. 536 ; S. A. & A. P. Ry. Co. v. Corley, 87 Tex. 432 , 29 S.

San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. Weigers

22 Tex. Civ. App. 344 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 20, 1899

Railway v. Waldo, 32 S. W. Rep., 783 ; Knittel v. Schmidt, 16 Texas Civ. App., 7; Railway v. Brown, 16 Texas Civ. App., 93. … Rep., 275 ; Ava v. Grenwalt, 73 Ill. App., 633 ; Treadwell v. Whitten, 80 Cal., 574 ; Bradbury v. Benton, 69 Me., 199; Lynch v. Railway, 63 N. Y. St. Rep., 431; Rosvelt v. Railway, 13 N. Y. Supp., 598 ; Railway v.

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Schoonmaker

181 S.W. 263 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 2, 1915

Co. v. Karr et al., 5 Tex. Civ. App. 60 , 24 S. W. 302 ; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Landry, 108 S. W. 461 ; Tel. Co. v. Brown, 58 Tex. 170 , 44 Am. Rep. 610 ; Railway Co. v. Cowser, 57 Tex. 306 . … Co. v. Brown, 234 U. S. 542 , 34 Sup. Ct. 955, 58 L. Ed. 1457 ; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Bilisoly, 116 Va. 562 , 82 S. E. 91 ; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Compton, 114 Ark. 193 , 169 S. W. 946 ; Western Union Tel. Co. v.

Garner v. Lumberton Independent School District

430 S.W.2d 418 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 17, 1968

It was held in Bear v. … (Emphasis added) In applying this statute the court in 1935 held in Bear v.

Stair v. Smith

299 S.W. 660 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 26, 1927

Trammell v. Mount, 68 Tex. 211 , 4 S. W. 377 , 2 Am. St. Rep. 479 ; Cauble v. Key (Tex. Civ. App.) 256 S. W. 654 . … S. 1925; Allen v. School District (Tex. Civ. App.) 283 S. W. 674 . It is undisputed that the board of equalization met in compliance with article 7206, R.