Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.82s
245 S.W.2d 753 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 1, 1952
The Board of Adjustment of the City of Dallas, in denying the application of appellants for the permit here sought, was acting as a quasi judicial body. Washington v. … Vol. 8, Secs. 25.327 and 25.32-8; Driskell v. Board of Adjustment, Tex.Civ.App., 195 S.W.2d 594 , pts. 6-8, er. ref. n. r. e. and authorities.
Cited 11 timesPublished17 Tex. Civ. App. 210 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 13, 1897
The Supreme Court of Illinois, in Railway v. … In Hotel Company v.
Cited 52 timesPublishedFirst Nat. Bank of Paris v. O'Neil Engineering Co.
176 S.W. 74 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 10, 1915
Henke & Pillot v. Keller, 50 Tex. Civ. App. 533 ; 110 S. W. 783 ; Brander v. Young, 12 Tex. 332 ; Clark v. Gillespie, 70 Tex. 513 , 8 S. W. *79 121; Harris v. Campbell, 68 Tex. 22 , 3 S. W. 243 , 2 Am. St. … Rep. 467 ; Davis & Goggin v. State Nat. Bank (Civ. App.) 156 S. W. 321 ; Harris County v. Donaldson, 20 Tex. Civ. App. 9 , 48 S. W. 791 ; German Fire Ins. Co. v. Gibbs, 42 Tex. Civ. App. 407 , 92 S. W. 1068 , 96 S.
Cited 5 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Texas · Mar 11, 2015
The assistant district attorney, Zan Colson Brown intentionally hindered service to ensure that his findings would remain unoppsed. … By:Z 'QH/m G»&FW@M¢U'“-/ v olson Brown, -ss tant District Attorney 69 l CERTIFICAIE OF SERVICE / INMATE DECLARATION l Larry Wayne Means #1899565, being presently incarcerated in the McConnell Unit of the Texas Department
Cited 0 timesPublishedZavala County v. E. D. K. Ranches, Inc.
544 S.W.2d 484 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 10, 1976
It is contended here that the board increased the valuations of appellees’ properties without notice, and therefore, the board lacked jurisdiction. In City of Arlington v. … City of Arlington v. Cannon, supra; Fayetteville Independent Sch. Dist. v. Crowley, supra; City of El Paso v. Howze, supra.
Cited 5 timesPublished967 S.W.2d 866 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 13, 1998
P. 25.2(b)(3); Brown v. State, 943 S.W.2d 35, 41 (Tex.Crim.App.1997) (interpreting rule 40(b)(1)); Lyon, 872 S.W.2d at 735 (interpreting rule 40(b)(1)). … See Williams v. State, No. 02-97-469-CR, slip op. at 2, 1997 WL 778285 , at *1 (Tex-App.— Fort Worth December 18, 1997, pet. filed); see also Brown, 943 S.W.2d at 41 ; Watson v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedTexas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Adcock
27 S.W.2d 363 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 22, 1930
Co. v. Bryan (Tex. Civ. … Dewey Adcock, et al. v.
Cited 26 timesPublishedMayflower Investment Company v. Stephens
345 S.W.2d 786 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 30, 1960
Only the burden of proof is involved in that case. (2) Southern Pine Lumber Co. v. … Sorenson Co. v.
Cited 30 timesPublishedJackson v. Maypearl Independent School District
392 S.W.2d 892 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 22, 1965
Sec. 481, p. 233; Martin v. Grandview Ind. Sch. Dist., Tex.Civ.App., Er.Ref., 266 S.W. 607 . Norton v. Shelby Co., 118 U.S. 425 , 6 S.Ct. 1121 , 30 L.Ed. 178 . … Milligan v. Corsicana Ind. Sch. Dist., Tex.Civ.App., n. r. e., 381 S.W.2d 97 ; State v. Whittenburg, 153 Tex. 205 , 265 S.W.2d 569 ; City of Arlington v. Cannon, 153 Tex. 566 , 271 S.W.2d 414 .
Cited 14 timesPublishedLiberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wright
196 S.W.2d 349 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 28, 1946
The following is a list of all the cases cited by appellant: Federal Underwriters Exchange v. Bobbitt, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 1084 ; Federal Underwriters Exchange v. … Ass’n, 129 Tex. 134 , 102 S.W.2d 180 ; Towns v. Traders & General Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 107 S.W.2d 460 . From the opinion in Zurich General Acc. & Liability Ins. Co. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedBear v. Donna Independent School Dist.
85 S.W.2d 797 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Aug 7, 1935
Harkness v. Hutcherson, 90 Tex. 383 , 38 S. W. 1120 ; Chilicothe Independent School District v. Dudney (Tex. Civ. App.) 142 S. W. 1007 . … Hunter v. Moore, 122 Tex. 583 , 62 S.W.(2d) 97 ; Red v. Bounds, 122 Tex. 614 , 63 S.W.(2d) 544 ; Reese v. Owens, 123 Tex. 493 , 72 S.W.(2d) 1113 ; Hidalgo County Water Imp. Dist. No. 1 v. Jay Van Horn (Tex. Com.
Cited 16 timesPublishedJenkins v. Crosby Independent School District
537 S.W.3d 142 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 15, 2017
School District v. … Transp. v.
Cited 27 timesPublishedMenardville Independent School Dist. v. Moser
90 S.W.2d 578 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 24, 1936
Wakefield Tp., 247 U.S. 350 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 62 L.Ed. 1154 ; Druesdow v. Baker (Tex.Com.App.) 229 S.W. 493 .” Rowland v. City of Tyler (Tex.Com.App.) 5 S.W.(2d) 756, 760 . Also, see Gonzalez v. … School Dist. et al. v. Baumer et al. (Tex.Civ.App.) 64 S.W.(2d) 412 ; Nederland Ind. School Dist. et al. v. Carter et al. (Tex.Civ.App.) 73 S.W.(2d) 935 ; Early v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedBurke v. Central Education Agency
701 S.W.2d 306 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 27, 1985
No. 1 v. Federal Power Com’n, 242 F.2d 672 (9th Cir.1957) (Federal Power Act § 313(b)); Alexander v. State Personnel Board, 137 P.2d 433 , 22 Cal.2d 198 (1943) (Civil Service Act § 173(c)); Peak v. … Industrial Accident Board, 82 Cal.App.2d 926 , 187 P.2d 905 (1947) (Labor Code § 5904); Meinhardt Cartage Co. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSecurity State Bank of San Juan v. State
169 S.W.2d 554 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 17, 1943
Florida v. United States 292 U.S. 1 , 54 S.Ct. 603 , 78 L.Ed. 1077 . … State v. Paris R. Co., 55 Tex. 76 ; State v. I. & G. N. Ry., 89 Tex. 562 , 35 S.W. 1067 ; American P. L. Co. v. Agey, Tex.Civ.App., 167 S.W.2d 580 .
Cited 12 timesPublishedPlains Common Consol. School Dist. No. 1 v. Hayhurst
122 S.W.2d 322 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 5, 1938
V. O’Neal was presented to the board of county school trustees and no action was obtained from such body. … Appeal shall always be from his rulings to the State Board.” As was said in Donna Independent School Dist. et al. v. First State Bank of Donna qt al., Tex.Civ.
Cited 40 timesPublishedEstes v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
46 S.W.2d 413 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 28, 1932
We think the board acted within the law in reviewing its former award and order. Lumbermen’s Reciprocal Ass’n v. Day (Tex. Com. App.) 17 S.W.(2d) 1043 . … The Supreme Court of Oklahoma, in Davis v.
Cited 20 timesPublished95 S.W.2d 170 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 21, 1936
This character of argument was condemned in Brown Cracker & C. Co. v. Castle (Tex.Civ.App.) 26 S.W. (2d) 435 . … Castle v. Brown C. & C. Co., 119 Tex. 447 , 31 S.W.(2d) 630 . The holding in the Castle Case was followed in Dallas Ry. & T. Co. v. Smith (Tex.Civ.App.) 42 S.W.(2d) 794 .
Cited 15 timesPublishedMitchison v. Houston Independent School District
803 S.W.2d 769 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 10, 1991
School Board Acting Without Authority If the school board acted without authority and contrary to express statutes, the aggrieved party may appeal directly to the courts. Bear v. … Bear v. Donna Independent School Dist., 74 S.W.2d at 181 . Federal Claims Exhaustion of state administrative remedies is not a prerequisite to an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . Patsy v.
Cited 87 timesPublishedLloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. State
524 S.W.2d 313 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 15, 1975
In support of this contention, defendant cites Western Alfalfa Corp. v. Air Pollution Variance Board, 534 P.2d 796 (Colo.App.1975). We conclude that defendants have not been denied due process. … It relies on Railway Express Agency v. Spain, 249 S.W.2d 644, 653 (Tex.Civ.App.
Cited 10 timesPublished
Ask Donna