Case law

St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Mayfield

35 Tex. Civ. App. 82 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 3, 1904

Co. v. Moore, 49 Texas, 31 . … Morris v. Brown, 111 N. Y., 318 . Whether a servant really is bent on his master’s affairs or not is generally a question of fact (Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Hayden, 6 Texas Civ. App., 747; Goodloe v. Railway Co., 54 Am. St.

Speer v. Allen

135 S.W. 231 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 28, 1911

Speer v. Eva Allen, 117 S.W. 1199 . This is an incorrect view of our rulings. The case of R. M. Speer v. … Kempner v. Huddleston, 90 Tex. 182 , 37 S.W. 1066 ; Layton v. Hall, 25 Tex. 204 .

Wilson v. Coleman

125 S.W.2d 637 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 15, 1939

The suit was one to recover title to a half interest in personal property situated in Brown County. The first ground is overruled upon the authority of St. Louis, A. & T. Ry. Co. v. … Co. v. Childs, Tex.Civ.App., 40 S.W. 41 ; Texas & P. R. Co. v. Lynch, Tex.Civ. App., 73 S.W. 65 ; Ramsey & Son v. Cook, Tex.Civ.App., 151 S.W. 346 ; Kelley v. Crouch Grain Co., Tex.Civ.App., 174 S.W. 630 ; Joy v. Ins.

Bates v. Pecos Cnty.

546 S.W.3d 277 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 29, 2017

Not law enforcement, per se, but labor board. Q And what did you report to the labor board? [Lawyer discussion] A. Yes. When I contacted the labor board, it was in regards to-wait .... … We also discussed the role of a county judge as the appropriate law enforcement authority in Upton County, Texas v. Brown , 960 S.W.2d 808 , 821 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1997, no writ).

Houston & T. C. R. v. Corsicana Fruit Co.

170 S.W. 849 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 24, 1914

Frank v. Tatum, 87 Tex. 204 , 25 S. W. 409 . … Rector v. Hudson, 20 Tex. 237 ; Railway Co. v. Adams, 63 Tex. 206 ; Wheeler v. Railway Co., 91 Tex. 356 , 43 S. W. 876 . And we see no good reason why the rule should not obtain where evidence was excluded.

Wright v. Maddox

288 S.W. 560 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 3, 1926

In this connection appellant cites the following decisions: Van Cleave v. Walker (Tex. Civ. App.) 210 S. W. 767 ; Parmele v. Abdo (Tex. Civ. App.) 215 S. W. 369 ; Rew v. Stoddard (Tex. Civ. App.) 225 S. … W. 836 ; and City Service Co. v. Brown (Tex. Civ. App.) 231 S. W. 140 .

All Persons Interested in or Affected by the Issuance of the Securities v. Jefferson County

397 S.W.2d 241 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 9, 1965

Brown, Jr. v. … Brown, Jr., caused to be filed a certain Cause No. B-84,584, upon the docket of the 60th District Court of Jefferson County, Texas, entitled ‘George W. Brown, Jr. v.

General Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. Higginbotham

750 S.W.2d 19 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 14, 1988

Homes of Taft v. Corpus Christi B. & T., 476 S.W.2d 97, 99 (Tex.Civ.App.—Corpus Christi 1972, no writ). … See Presidential Life Insurance Company v. Crooks, 479 S.W.2d 694, 697 (Tex.Civ. App.—Amarillo 1972, no writ).

Greenwood v. Lowe Chemical Co.

428 S.W.2d 358 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 24, 1968

See Ellis v. Moore, 401 S.W.2d 789, 793 (Tex.Sup.); Triangle Motors of Dallas v. Richmond, supra, 258 S.W.2d at pp. 63 and 64; Wood v. Kane Boiler Works, Inc., 150 Tex. 191 , 238 S.W.2d 172 ; Brown v. … Beneath the boiling vat was a board which plaintiff needed to use as part of the cover for the cooling vat. The board was difficult to dislodge.

Wright v. Wright

274 S.W.2d 414 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 1, 1954

Marie Brown, niece, and wife of Marvin Brown, share and share alike. In .this connection my wife, May M. … In the case of Avery v.

Browning, Donta Tremaine

Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 30, 2015

HIS-/S ELECTRONIC RECORD COA# 01-14-00052-CR OFFENSE: 22.02 (Aggravated Assault) Donta Tremaine Browning v. … TRIAL COURT: 240th District Court DATE: 02/26/2015 Publish: NO TC CASE #: ll-DCR-058541 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Donta Tremaine Browning

Purcella v. State

762 S.W.2d 696 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 7, 1988

Brown v. State, 692 S.W.2d 497, 502 (Tex.Crim.App.1985). McKay v. State, supra at 37. Initially we note that appellant failed to object to the prosecutor’s comments. … In Rose v.

In Re Reeves' Estate

7 S.W.2d 683 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 18, 1928

Powell v. Powell. 18 Kan. 371 , 381 [ 26 Am.Rep. 7741 . Age refers to age of consent fixed by common law. Browning v. Browning, 89 Kan. 98 , 101 [ 130 P. 852 , L.R.A. 1916C, 737 , Ann.Cas. 1914C, 1288]. Powell v. … Browning v. Browning, 89 Kan. 101 , 130 P. 852 , L.R.A. 1916C, 737 , Ann.Cas. 1914C, 1288.

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Taggart

194 S.W. 482 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 7, 1917

Murph et al. v. McCullough, 40 Tex. Civ. App. 403 , 90 S. W. 69 . … S.) 994; Barney v. Saunders, 16 How. 535 , 14 L. Ed. 1047 ; Me-Collister v. Bishop, 78 Minn. 228 , 80 N. W. 1188 ; Wood's Estate, etc., v. Surety Co., 159 Cal. 466 , 114 Pac. 992 , 36 D. R. A. 252; Ann.

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Moss

109 S.W.2d 1035 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 11, 1937

Dixie Motor Coach Corp. v. Galvan, 126 Tex. 109 , 86 S.W.(2d) 633 ; Orchin v. Ft. Worth Poultry & Egg Co. (Tex.Civ.App.) 43 S.W.(2d) 308 (Writ Ref.); Brown Cracker & Candy Co. v. … Co. v. Head (Tex.Civ.App.) 47 S.W.(2d) 625 ; Allen v. Denk (Tex.Civ.App.) 87 S.W.(2d) 303 ; Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Carson (Tex.Civ.App.) 63 S.W.(2d) 1096 ; City of Dallas v.

Roe v. Davis

142 S.W. 950 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 16, 1911

See Farley v. Railway Co., 34 Tex. Civ. App. 81 , 77 S.W. 1040 ; Morgan v. Bement, 24 Tex. Civ. App. 564 , 59 S.W. 907 ; Coats v. Elliott, 23 Tex. 606 ; Pridgen v. Walker, 40 Tex. 135 . … App. 86 , 58 S.W. 200 ; Jesson v. Loan Co., 3 Tex. Civ. App. 25 , 21 S.W. 625 ; Carey v. Brown, 62 Cal. 373 ; 2 Devlin on Deeds, § 425; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Hearne, 40 S.W. 50 ; Lundsford v.

Allen v. Kitchen

156 S.W. 331 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 19, 1913

V. and E. P. Brown for $350 damages upon a car of oats purchased by Allen and others from the Browns, and which did not meet the warranty of the vendors as to quality. … P. and El V. Brown were solvent at the time of filing the supersedeas bond above referred to, but that during the pendency of said appeal they became insolvent.

Reynolds v. State

686 S.W.2d 264 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 23, 1985

BROWN: Your Honor, may we approach the bench, please? THE COURT: Yes DISCUSSION AT THE BENCH OUT OF THE HEARING OF THE JURY PANEL MR. BROWN: May it please the Court. … BROWN: Note my exception, please.

Hein v. John Finnigan Co.

163 S.W. 124 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 14, 1914

But, while there may be some confusion on this subject in our Courts of Civil Appeals, the ease at bar is covered by the decision by our Supreme Court in the case of Brown v. … Brown made an oral promise that, if the bank would continue to accommodate W. O. Brown, he (E. Y.

Kuykendall v. Vaden

187 S.W.2d 143 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 29, 1945

The case of Brown Express, Inc. v. Arnold, 138 Tex. 70 , 157 S.W.2d 138 , is directly in point. In that case there was a collision between an automobile driven by one Arnold and one driven by one Walker. … Jur. 411, § 242; Mitchell v. Gibson, Tex.Civ.App., 160 S.W.2d 79 ; Turner v. Texas Co., 138 Tex. 380 , 159 S.W.2d 112 ; Longhorn Corporation v. Padilla, Tex.Civ.App., 138 S.W.2d 164 .