Case law

Trinity-Universal Ins. Co. v. Maxwell

101 S.W.2d 606 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 20, 1937

Delaware Punch Co. v. Reinarz (Tex.Civ.App.) 61 S.W.(2d) 135 (writ ref.); King v. Cliett (Tex.Civ.App.) 31 S.W.(2d) 350 (writ ref.); 20 Tex.Jur. 97, § 62; Taylor v. … Wootton v. Jones (Tex.Civ.App.) 286 S.W. 680, 688 .

James v. Gulf Ins. Co.

179 S.W.2d 397 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 1, 1944

Stone v. Brown, 54 Tex. 330 ; Tilton v. Dayton Independent School District, Tex.Civ.App., 2 S.W.2d 889 . … To the same effect are Popham v. Patterson, 121 Tex. 615 , 51 S.W.2d 680 ; Ellison v. Texas Liquor Control Board, Tex.Civ.App., 154 S.W.2d 322 , error refused; Terrell v.

Williams v. Kirby Lumber Co.

136 S.W. 1182 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 29, 1911

Railway Co. v. Peters, 87 Tex. 222 , 27 S. W. 257 ; Railway Co. v. Hinzie, 82 Tex. 623 , 18 S. W. 681 ; Young v. Hahn, 96 Tex. 99 , 70 S. W. 950 ; Alaska Treadwell Co. v. Whelan, 64 Fed. 462 , 12 C. C. … Brown v. Griffin, 71 Tex. 659 , 9 S.

National Life & Acc. Ins. Co. v. Hanna

195 S.W.2d 733 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 31, 1946

Burrell v. Adams, 104 Tex. 183 , 135 S.W. 1156 ; Sutherland v. Friedenbloom, 200 S.W. 1099 (writ ref.); Central, etc., Bank v. First National Bank of Waco, Tex.Civ.App., 246 S.W. 111 . … Lockley v. Page, 142 Tex. 594 , 180 S.W. 2d 616 ; Postal Mutual Ind. Co. v. James, Tex.Civ.App., 154 S.W.2d 148 ; Texas Practice Rule 279.

Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. Dickerson

194 S.W.2d 146 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 17, 1946

Co. v. Boggs, 66 S.W.2d 787 ; Maryland Casualty Co. v. Stewart, Tex.Civ.App., 164 S.W.2d 800 (writ ref.). … These facts bring the instant case within the rule announced in Dempster Mill v. Lester, Tex.Civ.App., 131 S.W.2d 254 ; and the City of Waco v.

Southern Pac. Co. v. McKinley

80 S.W.2d 1009 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 7, 1935

Jur., Title Limitation of Actions, .§§ 97 and 120; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Renn, 241 U. S. 290 , 36 S. Ct. 567 , 60 L. Ed. 1006 ; Pope v. Ry. Co., 109 Tex. 311 , 207 S. W. 514 , and cases there cited. … As to the contention that McGinley, as a matter of law, assumed the risk incident to boarding the car while it was moving at a dangerously rapid speed, we need only refer to Chesapeake & O. R. Co. v. De Atley, 241 U.

Durham v. Zarcades

270 S.W.3d 708 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 30, 2008

Co. v. Old, 946 S.W.2d 52, 53 (Tex.1997); Centeq Realty, Inc. v. Siegler, 899 S.W.2d 195, 197 (Tex.1995). … IHS Cedars Treatment Ctr., 143 S.W.3d at 799; Arguelles v. Kellogg Brown & Root, 222 S.W.3d 714, 731 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2007, no pet.).

Leonard v. BRAZOSPORT BANK OF TEXAS

628 S.W.2d 216 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 4, 1982

CURTISS BROWN, Chief Justice. This appeal attacks a summary judgment entered against appellants, plaintiffs in the court below, in a suit to set aside a trustee’s foreclosure sale. … Blaylock v. Dollar Inns of America, Inc., 548 S.W.2d 924, 933 (Tex.Civ.App.—Tyler 1977), modified sub nom., Diversified Mortgage Investors v.

Rhodes v. Liberty Welding Works

391 S.W.2d 796 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 20, 1965

The testimony of Don Brown that he was partially influenced by Mrs. Gresham’s condition cannot be considered by this court in passing upon the question of jury misconduct. Sproles Motor Freight *799 Lines v. … Brown & Root v. Haddad, 142 Tex. 624 , 180 S.W.2d 339 . The points are overruled. Affirmed.

McCormick v. King

268 S.W.2d 552 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 7, 1954

Co. v. Hamrick, 127 Tex. *554 403, 94 S.W.2d 421 ; Swearingen v. Brown, Tex.Civ.App., 195 S.W.2d 724 ; Bigelow v. Rupp, Tex.Civ.App., 192 S.W.2d 791 ; McGregor Milling & Grain Co. v. … Tucker, Tex.Civ.App., 207 S.W.2d 937 ; Hicks v. Brown, 136 Tex. 399 , 151 S.W.2d 790 ; Rosenthal Dry Goods Co. v. Hillebrandt, Tex.Com.App., 7 S.W.2d 521 ; Thurman v.

Bledsoe v. State

754 S.W.2d 331 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 9, 1988

Brown was acting as an agent of the State. … Brown’s testimony. Point of error two is overruled.

BROWN, GEORGE ROY Sr.

Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 11, 2015

it /-> St" ^Judicial QtsrAscr ZduAt oAfi*/*,* /Lou^Y, Ztx/x /i#v& J^su/^i/y Ovd Zr?f£^Y/^aj/Z bJ/rt Ma/Ste,! … v ;"• ,,• .wp'•'•-• • .;.„_. -,- '...;•

Wilson v. Coleman

125 S.W.2d 637 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 15, 1939

The suit was one to recover title to a half interest in personal property situated in Brown County. The first ground is overruled upon the authority of St. Louis, A. & T. Ry. Co. v. … Co. v. Childs, Tex.Civ.App., 40 S.W. 41 ; Texas & P. R. Co. v. Lynch, Tex.Civ. App., 73 S.W. 65 ; Ramsey & Son v. Cook, Tex.Civ.App., 151 S.W. 346 ; Kelley v. Crouch Grain Co., Tex.Civ.App., 174 S.W. 630 ; Joy v. Ins.

Wendy Lee Kyle v. H.T. Strasburger, Individually and in His Capacity as a Member of the Board of Directors of Fidelity Bank of Texas, and as a Member of Tuition LLCShirley Strasburger, Individually and in Her Capacity as Vice-Chair of the Board of Directors of Fidelity

520 S.W.3d 74 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 24, 2015

STRASBURGER, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF FIDELITY BANK OF TEXAS, AND AS A MEMBER OF TUITION LLC, SHIRLEY STRASBURGER, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER CAPACITY AS VICE-CHAIR OF THE BOARD … Strasburger, individually and in his capacity as chair of the board of directors of Fidelity Bank of Texas, and as a member of Tuition LLC; Shirley Strasburger, individually and in her capacity as vice-chair of the board

Ignacio Martin Gonzalez v. State

455 S.W.3d 198 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 17, 2014

EVID. 401–402; Brown v. State, 757 S.W.2d 739, 740 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). … Brown, 757 S.W.2d at 740–41. In Brown v. State, the prosecution sought to admit evidence that a rape victim suffered intense psychological trauma from the assault. Id. at 740.

Bradeen v. State

711 S.W.2d 263 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 7, 1986

Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); Loar v. State, 627 S.W.2d 399, 400 (Tex.Crim.App.1982). … Newberry v. State, 552 S.W.2d 457 (Tex.Crim.App.1977), upon which appellant relies, is distinguishable from the instant case.

Terry v. Zachry

272 S.W.2d 157 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 8, 1954

He asserted that Zachry was the chairman of the board for the corporation when the contract was executed, that the corporate acts were performed at the specific direction .and under the personal supervision and control of … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 189 Misc. 1024 , 68 N.Y.S.2d 914 ; Moskowitz v. Feuer, 265 App.Div. 884 , 38 N.Y.S.2d 242 , affirmed 291 N.Y. 568 , 50 N.E.2d 659 ; Hicks v.

Maverick v. Routh

7 Tex. Civ. App. 669 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 2, 1894

BROWN "v. "No. 126. "J.H. ROUTH ET AL. … Tarply v. Poage, 2 Tex. 148 ; Johns v. Hardin, 81 Tex. 40 .

State Ex Rel. Wayland v. Vincent

217 S.W. 402 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 3, 1919

v. … Chicago v. Reeves, 220 Ill. 274 , 77 N. E. 237 . In the case of Brown v. Galveston, supra, practically the same holding is made.

City of Beaumont v. Stephenson

95 S.W.2d 1360 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 9, 1936

Brown v. Ruse, 69 Tex. 589 , 7 S.W. 489 : 28 Tex.Jur. 640, Mandamus, § 66, note 9. While respondents, mavor P. D. Renfro, city manager C. … In Gaal v.