Case law

Haney v. Cooke County Tax Appraisal District

782 S.W.2d 349 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 29, 1989

Bd. of Equal. v. Hackett, 563 S.W.2d 338, 341 (Tex.Civ.App.—Waco 1978, writ ref’d n.r.e.). … Dist. v.

Office of Public Insurance Counsel v. Texas Automobile Insurance Plan

860 S.W.2d 231 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 15, 1993

In Corpus Christi Independent School District v. Padilla, 709 S.W.2d 700 (Tex.App. … TAIP, not the Board, is the agency vested with the power to govern the assigned risk plan and is subject only to the Board’s oversight. See Zuniga v. Allstate Ins. Co., 693 S.W.2d 735 , 737 n. 2 (Tex.App.

South Texas Coaches, Inc. v. Woodard

123 S.W.2d 395 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 18, 1937

Darden, Tex.Civ.App., 23 S.W.2d 739 , affirmed by Tex.Com.App., 38 S.W.2d 777 ; Brown Cracker & Candy Co. v. Castle, Tex.Civ.App., 26 S.W.2d 435 , error dismissed Castle v. … Brown Cracker & Candy Co., 119 Tex. 447 , 31 S.W.2d 630 ; South Plains Coaches v. Behringer, Tex.Civ.App., 32 S.W.2d 959 , error dismissed.

Brown, Harold

Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 18, 2015

i^a-75* ELECTRONIC RECORD COA # 14-14-00165-CR OFFENSE: Capital Murder STYLE: Harold Brown v The State of Texas COUNTY: Harris COA DISPOSITION … v The State of Texas CCA# APPELLAMT}*> Petition CCA Disposition: im~/r FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE: JUDGE:

Cotton Concentration Co. v. A. Lassberg & Co.

433 S.W.2d 736 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 25, 1968

Texas Employers’ Insurance Ass’n. v. Wagner 288 S.W.2d p. 882, (Ct.Tex.Civ.Apps., 1956). … Brown was in a real sense appellant’s agent maintaining appellant’s business agency in the Cotton Exchange Building in Dallas, Dallas County, Texas. In Milligan v.

Terry v. Zachry

272 S.W.2d 157 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 8, 1954

He asserted that Zachry was the chairman of the board for the corporation when the contract was executed, that the corporate acts were performed at the specific direction .and under the personal supervision and control of … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 189 Misc. 1024 , 68 N.Y.S.2d 914 ; Moskowitz v. Feuer, 265 App.Div. 884 , 38 N.Y.S.2d 242 , affirmed 291 N.Y. 568 , 50 N.E.2d 659 ; Hicks v.

Jim Austin Olds-Cadillac & Toyota Co. v. Gaspard

592 S.W.2d 364 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 8, 1979

Reliance is had upon language found in American Transfer & Storage Co. v. Brown, 584 S.W.2d 284, 294-296 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1979, writ granted). … Williams, 566 S.W.2d 561, 564 (Tex.1978), and are not, consequently, subject to the ruling in Brown, supra.

Walker-Smith Co. v. Coker

176 S.W.2d 1002 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 3, 1943

Coker in Brown County on April 9, 1930. On May 19, 1930, an execution was issued to Brown County and returned by the sheriff on the same day; the return showed that no property of C. C. … Nothing found m Brown County subject to execution.”

Meisner v. Taylor

56 Tex. Civ. App. 187 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 26, 1909

It is settled in Clark v. Burke, 39 S. … Woeltz v. Woeltz, 93 Texas, 549 .

Clifton Mfg. Co. v. Crawford-Austin Mfg. Co.

12 S.W.2d 1098 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 3, 1929

Canal Co. v. Clark [ 13 Wall. 311 , 20 L. … Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co., supra; Coca-Cola Co. v. Gay-Ola Co., supra; Id. (C. C. A.) 211 E. 942; Shredded Wheat Co. v. Humphrey Cornell Co. (C. C. A.) 250 E. 960; Charles E. Hires Co. v. Consumers’ Co. (C.

Meier v. Suntex Oil & Gas Co.

413 S.W.2d 944 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 3, 1967

Hurt v. Marshall, 75 Tex. 452 , 13 S.W. 33 (1889); Morris v. … Brown’s rights were limited to the 63.51 acre tract. He had no interest in the royalties from the gas well on Section 1162. Japhet v. McRae, 276 S.W. 669 (Tex.Comm’n App., judg. adopted, 1925); Hinds v.

Bryant v. Browning

48 S.W.2d 798 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 6, 1932

Co. v. Norton (Tex. Com. App.) 6 S.W.(2d) 767 . … Wright v. McCampbell, 75 Tex. 644 , 13 S. W. 293 ; Davis v. Webber, 66 Ark. 190 , 49 S. W. 822 , 45 L. R. A. 196, 74 Am. St. Rep. 81 ; 2 R. C. L. 1060; 40 A. L. R. 1529, note; McGowan v. Parish, 237 U. S. 285 , 35 S.

City of Houston v. Davilla

582 S.W.2d 183 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 19, 1979

Garza v. Alviar, 395 S.W.2d 821, 823 (Tex.1965). Only the evidence and inferences tending to support the finding can be considered, and all contrary evidence and inferences must be disregarded. … Brown.

Old Lincoln County Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Justice County Mut. Ins. Co.

237 S.W.2d 678 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 8, 1951

Brown and called upon appellee to re-insure $1000 of it under the terms of the contract which was done. … Co. v. Fidelity Union Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 157 S.W.2d 663 , that the liability in such cases must be shown to be within the terms of the assumption contract. In the case of Employers’ Indemnity Corporation v.

Keils v. Waldron

240 S.W.2d 788 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 7, 1951

Lane v. Jack, 25 Tex.Civ.App. 496 , 61 S.W. 422 ; Kerlin v. Bassett, Tex.Civ.App., 152 S.W. 526 ; Delgado v. Chapa, Tex.Civ.App., 173 S.W. 1169 ; Tibbitts v. Lacy, Tex.Civ.App., 225 S.W. 190 ; Rose v. … Skiles, Tex.Civ.App., 245 S.W. 127 ; Beacon Lumber Co. v. Brown, Tex.Com.App., 14 S.W.2d 1022 ; Cox, Inc., v. Knight, Tex.Civ.App., 50 S.W. 2d 915 ; Madison v. Martinez, Tex.Civ. App., 56 S.W.2d 908 ; Brown v.

Trinity-Universal Ins. Co. v. Maxwell

101 S.W.2d 606 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 20, 1937

Delaware Punch Co. v. Reinarz (Tex.Civ.App.) 61 S.W.(2d) 135 (writ ref.); King v. Cliett (Tex.Civ.App.) 31 S.W.(2d) 350 (writ ref.); 20 Tex.Jur. 97, § 62; Taylor v. … Wootton v. Jones (Tex.Civ.App.) 286 S.W. 680, 688 .

Rex Refining Co., Inc. v. Morris

72 S.W.2d 687 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 5, 1934

App.) 171 S.W. 786 ; Continental Trust Co. v. Brown (Tex. Civ. App.) 179 S.W. 939 , 944; Republic Trust Co. v. Taylor (Tex. Civ. … See Cahn v. Johnson, 12 Tex. Civ. App. 304 , 33 S.W. 1000 ; New Birmingham, etc., v. Blevens, 12 Tex. Civ. App. 410 , 34 S.W. 828 , 832; Carter v. Hightower, 79 Tex. 135 , 15 S.W. 223 ; Waples-Platter Co. v.

Sandare Chemical Co., Inc. v. WAKO Intern., Inc.

820 S.W.2d 21 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 20, 1991

United States Sugar Equalization Board, 268 F. 575, 582-83 (S.D.N.Y.1920); Second National Bank v. Samuel & Sons, 12 F.2d 963, 968 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 273 U.S. 720 , 47 S.Ct. 110 , 71 L.Ed. 857 (1926); Schechter v. … As we stated in McCann v. Brown, 725 S.W.2d 822, 826 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1987, no writ), “Although Cavnar involved an action for personal injury, its reasoning has been interpreted to extend to all types of suits.”

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Bryant

84 S.W.2d 492 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 24, 1935

Co. v. Brown (Tex. Civ. App.) 74 S.W.(2d) 531 . On the other phase of the objection that the court assumed that the defendant suffered an injury, we are of the opinion that the same is not well founded. … Co. v.

Nolte Irr. Co. v. Willis

180 S.W.2d 451 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 24, 1944

See, also, Simon v. Nance, Tex.Civ.App., 142 S.W. 661 ; Johnson v. Lancaster, Tex.Civ.App., 266 S.W. 565 . … Powers v. Temple Trust Co., 124 Tex. 440 , 78 S.W.2d 951 ; Hill v. Brown, Tex.Com.App., 237 S.W. 252 ; Smiley v. City of Graham, Tex.Civ.App., 37 S.W.2d 289 . The judgment is affirmed.