Case law

Uvalde Const. Co. v. Shannon

165 S.W.2d 512 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 9, 1942

Texas Coca-cola Bottling Company v. Kubena, Tex.Civ.App., 90 S. W.2d 605 ; Hill v. Uvalde Construction Company, Tex.Civ.App., 151 S.W.2d 283 . … For application of the same principle to Exception 29 (R.S.1925, Art. 1995), see Blanton v. Garrett, 133 Tex. 399 , 129 S. W.2d 623 ; A. H. Belo Corporation v. Blanton, 133 Tex. 391 , 129 S.W.2d 619 .

Hereford v. Farrar

469 S.W.2d 16 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 16, 1971

Womack v. Berry, 156 Tex. 44 , 291 S.W.2d 677 (1956); Anderson v. Polk, 117 Tex. 73 , 297 S.W. 219 (1927). … Dykes v. City of Houston, 406 S.W.2d 176 (Tex.Sup.1966); Womack v. Berry, supra.

Hackney Mfg. Co. v. Celum

189 S.W. 988 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 23, 1916

See Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Webb, 181 S.W. 853 ; United States Gypsum Co. v. Shields, 106 S.W. 724 ; Bonding Co. v. Bomar, 169 S.W. 1060 ; Kirby v. Thurmond, 152 S.W. 1099 . … Wills v. Tyer, 186 S.W. 862 .

Brown, Antonio Leonard

Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 3, 2015

%vt-is ELECTRONIC RECORD COA # 02-14-00344-CR OFFENSE: 22.01 Antonio Leonard Brown v. … v.

Cotton Concentration Co. v. A. Lassberg & Co.

433 S.W.2d 736 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 25, 1968

Texas Employers’ Insurance Ass’n. v. Wagner 288 S.W.2d p. 882, (Ct.Tex.Civ.Apps., 1956). … Brown was in a real sense appellant’s agent maintaining appellant’s business agency in the Cotton Exchange Building in Dallas, Dallas County, Texas. In Milligan v.

Wilson v. National Bank

27 Tex. Civ. App. 54 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 12, 1901

Feibleman v. Edmonds, 69 Texas, 335 ; Goodman v. … Rice v. Peteet, 66 Texas, 568 ; Roller v. Holley, 76 U. S., 398 . Under the facts the court did not err in instructing a verdict for appellee. That portion of the judgment which is rendered against B. D.

Lundine v. McKinney

183 S.W.2d 265 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 22, 1944

Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Marshall, Tex. Civ.App., 146 S.W.2d 411, 412 , writ refused; Gaines v. Farmer, 55 Tex.Civ.App. 601 , 119 S.W. 874 ; Willis v. Davis, Tex. … He cites Brown v. Harris County Medical Soc., Tex. Civ. App, 194 S.W. 1179 .

Southern Pac. Co. v. McKinley

80 S.W.2d 1009 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 7, 1935

Jur., Title Limitation of Actions, .§§ 97 and 120; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Renn, 241 U. S. 290 , 36 S. Ct. 567 , 60 L. Ed. 1006 ; Pope v. Ry. Co., 109 Tex. 311 , 207 S. W. 514 , and cases there cited. … As to the contention that McGinley, as a matter of law, assumed the risk incident to boarding the car while it was moving at a dangerously rapid speed, we need only refer to Chesapeake & O. R. Co. v. De Atley, 241 U.

Old Lincoln County Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Justice County Mut. Ins. Co.

237 S.W.2d 678 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 8, 1951

Brown and called upon appellee to re-insure $1000 of it under the terms of the contract which was done. … Co. v. Fidelity Union Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 157 S.W.2d 663 , that the liability in such cases must be shown to be within the terms of the assumption contract. In the case of Employers’ Indemnity Corporation v.

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Dallas County Appraisal District

732 S.W.2d 717 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 21, 1987

The Missouri Pacific Railroad Company brought this action against the Dallas County Appraisal District, the Dallas County Appraisal Review Board, and John Marshall as chief appraiser for the district. … Pierce Co. v. Watkins, 114 Tex. 153, 158 , 263 S.W. 905, 907 (1924); see also Bardwell v. Anderson, 325 S.W.2d 929, 939 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston 1959, writ ref’d n.r.e.).

Brown, Richard Jr.

Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 27, 2015

W06-62942-S(B) THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 282ND JUDICIAL V. DISTRICT COURT RICHARD BROWN, JR. … SIGNED this 1-V day ofMarch, 2015.

South Texas Coaches, Inc. v. Woodard

123 S.W.2d 395 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 18, 1937

Darden, Tex.Civ.App., 23 S.W.2d 739 , affirmed by Tex.Com.App., 38 S.W.2d 777 ; Brown Cracker & Candy Co. v. Castle, Tex.Civ.App., 26 S.W.2d 435 , error dismissed Castle v. … Brown Cracker & Candy Co., 119 Tex. 447 , 31 S.W.2d 630 ; South Plains Coaches v. Behringer, Tex.Civ.App., 32 S.W.2d 959 , error dismissed.

Terry v. Zachry

272 S.W.2d 157 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 8, 1954

He asserted that Zachry was the chairman of the board for the corporation when the contract was executed, that the corporate acts were performed at the specific direction .and under the personal supervision and control of … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 189 Misc. 1024 , 68 N.Y.S.2d 914 ; Moskowitz v. Feuer, 265 App.Div. 884 , 38 N.Y.S.2d 242 , affirmed 291 N.Y. 568 , 50 N.E.2d 659 ; Hicks v.

R_M_G v. State

711 S.W.2d 397 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 22, 1986

Brown v. State, 558 S.W.2d 471, 472 (Tex.Crim.App.1977). … Blair v. State, 511 S.W.2d 277, 279 (Tex.Crim.App.1974) (emphasis in original). Moreover, a witness may be asked any question, the answer to which may tend to affect his credibility. Koehler v.

San Antonio Gas Co. v. State of Texas

22 Tex. Civ. App. 118 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 1, 1899

Brown v. Chenoworth, 51 Texas, 470 . … Railway v. State, 75 Texas, 434 ; Railway v. State, 83 Texas, 1 .

Hoard v. McFarland

229 S.W. 687 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 10, 1921

Brown and McFarland and Lee are all named as parties defendant. … Watkins v. Willis, 58 Tex. 523 .

Haney v. Cooke County Tax Appraisal District

782 S.W.2d 349 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 29, 1989

Bd. of Equal. v. Hackett, 563 S.W.2d 338, 341 (Tex.Civ.App.—Waco 1978, writ ref’d n.r.e.). … Dist. v.

Clifton Mfg. Co. v. Crawford-Austin Mfg. Co.

12 S.W.2d 1098 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 3, 1929

Canal Co. v. Clark [ 13 Wall. 311 , 20 L. … Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co., supra; Coca-Cola Co. v. Gay-Ola Co., supra; Id. (C. C. A.) 211 E. 942; Shredded Wheat Co. v. Humphrey Cornell Co. (C. C. A.) 250 E. 960; Charles E. Hires Co. v. Consumers’ Co. (C.

Southern Health Ass'n v. Harris Memorial Methodist Hospital

180 S.W.2d 169 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 7, 1944

BROWN, Justice. … “V.

Texas Midland Railroad v. Ritchey

49 Tex. Civ. App. 409 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 29, 1908

It is insisted that “it is the duty of a passenger to exercise reasonable and ordinary care for his own safety in boarding or alighting from a train,” and that there was evidence from which the jury could have found that … Ry. v. Brown, 16 Texas Civ. App., 93; Missouri, K. & T. Ry. v. Wright, 19 Texas Civ. App., 47; Northern Pac. Ry. v. Urlin, 158 U. S., 277 ; 1 Greenleaf on Ev. (16th ed.), secs. 162a and 162b.