Case law

Moss v. Slack

141 S.W. 1063 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 4, 1911

See Cole v. Grigsby, 89 Tex. 229 , 35 S.W. 792 ; Caruth v. Grigsby, 57 Tex. 259 ; Thompson v. Cragg, 24 Tex. 582 . See, also, Rudd v. Johnson, 60 Tex. 91 . … Among the decisions cited are Clapps' Executors v. Branch, 11 Tex. Civ. App. 203 , 32 S.W. 735 ; Tiboldi v. Palms, 34 Tex. Civ. App. 318 , 78 S.W. 726 ; Id., 97 Tex. 414 , 79 S.W. 23 .

Eaton v. First Nat. Bank of Littlefield

85 S.W.2d 268 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 1, 1935

In Switzer v. Smith (Tex. Com. App.) 300 S. W. 31, 33 , 68 A. L. R. 377, Judge Speer says: “Since Treadway v. … Martin v. Burns, 80 Tex. 676 , 16 S. W. 1072 ; Gibbs v. Scales, 54 Tex. Civ. App. 96 , 118 S. W. 188 (writ refused); Chapman v. Kellogg (Tex. Com. App.) 252 S. W. 151 ; Borders v. Highsmith (Tex. Civ. App.) 252 S.

Pruner v. Lovejoy

314 S.W.2d 651 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 28, 1958

Rutherford v. Deaver, Tex.Com.App., 235 S.W. 853 , opinion adopted Sup.Ct.; Bailey v. Bailey, Tex.Civ.App,, 212 S.W.2d 189 , W/E Refused. … Pugh v. Turner, 145 Tex. 292 , 197 S.W.2d 822 , 172 A.L.R. 707 . Likewise, the witness had no interest in the estate as the husband of Mrs. Edna Ruth Lovejoy. Lehmann v. Krahl, 155 Tex. 270 , 285 S.W.2d 179 .

Matt v. Ward

255 S.W. 794 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 3, 1923

The court further found that Will Browning filed for probate the will within a reasonable time after learning of its existence. In Armendariz de Acosta v. … Ryan v. Railway, 64 Tex. 239 , Dew v. Dew, 23 Tex. Civ. App. 676 , 57 S.W. 926 ; Pena v. Bruni (Tex.Civ.App.) 156 S.W. 315 ." Article 3248, V. S.

Johnson v. Safeco Insurance Company

464 S.W.2d 164 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 17, 1971

Both parties to this appeal cite as controlling authority Elder Chevrolet Co. v. Bailey County Motor Co., 151 S.W.2d 938 (Tex.Civ.App.1941, n. w. h.); Pioneer Mut. Compensation Co. v. … In Pioneer Mutual Compensation Co. v.

State v. Van Natta

805 S.W.2d 40 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 27, 1991

v. … The recent decision of our Court of Criminal Appeals in King v.

Northwestern National Insurance Co. v. Kirchoff

427 S.W.2d 638 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 10, 1968

McCartney v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. (Tex.Sup.Ct.), 362 S.W.2d 838 ; Southern Underwriters v. Boswell, 138 Tex. 255 , 158 S.W.2d 280 ; Texas Emp. Ins. Ass’n v. … Brown came to his home. On that occasion the plaintiff and Mrs. Brown discussed the filing of his claim for compensation. Mrs. Brown told the plaintiff that everything was being taken care of.

Continental Casualty Co. v. Chase

203 S.W. 779 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 17, 1918

Akin v. Jefferson, 65 Tex. 137 ; Brown v. Renfro, 57 Tex. 332 ; Fant v. Sullivan, 152 S. W. 521, and cases there cited; Ketchum v. Boggs, 194 S. W. 201 ; Darden v. Taylor, 60 Tex. Civ. App. 73 , 126 S. … W. 944 ; Waller v. Liles, 96 Tex. 22 , 70 S. W. 17 ; Ablowich v. Bank, 95 Tex. 432 , 67 S. W. 79, 881 . In the case of Waller v.

Elk Mfg. Co. v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Abilene

18 S.W.2d 747 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 17, 1929

That opinion also quotes with approval from another case (Tifft v. … The opinion does not modify in any sense the holding in such cases as Murray Co. v. Randolph (Tex.Civ.App.) 174 S.W. 825 , and Phillips v.

Wichita Home Ins. Co. v. Montgomery

4 S.W.2d 1041 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 26, 1927

P. v. Hooper, (Tex. Civ. App.) 282 S. … Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the World, v. Putnam (Tex. Civ. App.) 206 S. W. 970 ; McCorkle et al. v. Texas Benevolent Association, 71 Tex. 149 , 8 S. W. 516 ; Independent Order of Puritans v. Brown (Tex. Civ.

W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Mayberry

193 S.W. 199 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 17, 1917

Co. v. Johnson, 162 S. W. 394 ; Armstrong v. Rawleigh Med. Co., 178 S. W. 582 ; Pictorial Review Co. v. Pate Bros., 185 S. W. 309 ; Rawleigh Med. Co. v. Fitzpatrick, 184 S. W. 549 ; Rawleigh Med. Co. v. Gunn, 186 S. … Brown and W. T. (W.) Mayberry, etc.

Keel v. Kilgore Transfer & Storage Co.

238 S.W.2d 738 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 8, 1951

Thornton v. Daniel, Tex.Civ.App., 185 S.W. 585 ; Foote v. DeBogory, Tex.Civ. App., 179 S.W.2d 983 ; Ricks v. Smith, Tex.Civ.App., 204 S.W.2d 12 ; Seal v. White, Tex.Civ.App., 217 S.W.2d 38 . … Brown & Root v. Haddad, 142 Tex. 624 , 180 S.W.2d 339, 342 , and cases there cited. The judgment of the trial court is in'all things affirmed.

Hatcher v. City of Dallas

133 S.W. 914 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 14, 1911

In the cases of Garonzik v. State, 50 Tex. Cr. R. 533 , 100 S. W. 374 , and Williams v. State, 52 Tex. Cr. R. 371 , 107 S. … In City of San Antonio v. Schneider, 37 S.

Moon v. Alred

277 S.W. 787 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 26, 1925

Bee, also, Brown v. Clark, 102 Tex. 323 , 116 S. W. 360 , 24 L. R. A. (N. S.) 670. The rule of construction as declared in the above cases must control the instant case. … To the same effect are the following: De Witt v. San Francisco, 2 Cal. 289 ; Sheidley v. Lynch, 95 Mo. 4S7, 8 S. W. 434 ; State v. Board of Education, 71 W. Va. 52 , 76 S. E. 128 , Ann. Cas. 1914B, 1238.

Southern Surety Co. v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n

2 S.W.2d 310 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 8, 1927

Fink v. Brown (Tex. Com. App.) 215 S. W. 847 et seq., and authorities there cited; Eddingston v. Acorn (Tex. Civ. App.) 259 S. W. 948, 951 , par. 2 (writ' dismissed); Ogus, Rabinovich & Ogus Co. v. Foley Bros. … W. 1048, 1051 ; Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Strauss (Tex. Civ. App.) 243 S. W. 528, 538 ; Pyron v. Brownfield (Tex. Civ. App.) 238 S. W. 725, 727 .

First Nat. Bank in Orange v. Coyle

95 S.W.2d 1337 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 18, 1936

Under the recent opinion by the Commission of Appeals in Powers v. … It was expressly so held in Hill v. Brown (Tex.Com.App.) 237 S.W. 252, 255 , contrary to expressions contained in prior opinions.” See, also, West Texas Utilities Co. v.

Vickers v. Peddy

55 Tex. Civ. App. 259 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 14, 1909

I find that Nellie Brown and Laura Brown conveyed by deed to V. H. Vickers, for the sum of $75, all of the 100 acres that had not been previously conveyed to W. F. … (Ld.) v. Thetford, 27 Texas Civ. App., 152; Ley v. Hahn, 36 Texas Civ. App., 208.

Hurt v. Cooper

113 S.W.2d 929 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 5, 1938

See State Board of Tax Com’rs v. Jackson, 283 U.S. 527, 551 , 51 S.Ct. 540, 543 , 75 L.Ed. 1248 , 73 A.L.R. 1464 , 75 A.L.R. 1536 ; Liggett Co. v. … Amos, 104 Fla. 609 , 141 So. 153 , on a phase, of the case, but strongly reaffirming the doctrine announced in State Board v. Jackson, supra; also, Fox v.

Texas N. O. R. Co. v. Bell

28 S.W.2d 853 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 8, 1930

See, also, Payne v. Connor (C. C. A.) 274 F. 497 ; Montgomery v. B. & O. Ry. Co. (C. C. A.) 22 F.(2d) 359 ; Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Proffitt, 241 U. S. 462 , 36 S. Ct. 620 , 60 L. Ed. 1102 ; G., H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. … Brown, the railroad’s doctor, says in effect that plaintiff’s condition is permanent, and no further improvement may be expected.

Denton v. State

896 S.W.2d 580 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 30, 1995

Moreno v. … In Curtis v.