Case law

In re Sassin

511 S.W.3d 121 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 11, 2014

Haas v. George, 71 S.W.3d 904, 915 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 2002, no pet.). … Angelina Cnty. v. McFarland, 374 S.W.2d 417, 422-23 (Tex.1964). The challenged attorney must appear before the trial court to show his authority to act on behalf of his client. Tex.R.Civ.P. 12; R.H. v.

Garrett v. Reno Oil Company

271 S.W.2d 764 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 24, 1954

But in the opinion of the single appellate court we have been able to find which affirms the principle declared by the District of Columbia Circuit Court in the Hitaffer case, to-wit, Brown v. … . * * * ” ■ We are in accord with the broad principle of justice motivating the Georgia court in the quoted statement in the case of Brown v.

Burton Lingo Co. v. First Baptist Church

198 S.W. 1013 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 15, 1917

In Trammell v. Rosen, 106 Tex. 132 , 157 S. … See Finnigan-Brown Co. v. Escobar, 179 S. W. 1127 . Dismissed. WALTHALL, J., did not sit, being absent on committee of judges assisting the Supreme Court,

Davis v. Parks

157 S.W. 449 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 10, 1913

In Gillespie v. … El Paso v. Ruckman, 92 Tex. 86 , 46 S. W. 25 ; White v. Quanah, 27 S. W. 839 ; Coffman v. Goree Independent School District, 141 S. W. 132 ; Wilson v. Brown, 145 S. W. 639 .

Levy v. Rivaux

84 S.W.2d 847 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 10, 1935

Citing Perrett v. Wegner (Tex. Civ. App.) 139 S. W. 984 ; Brown v. Uhr (Tex. Civ. App.) 187 S. W. 381 ; Uhr v. Lambert (Tex. Civ. App.) 188 S. W. 946 ; and Uhr v. Brown (Tex. Civ. App.) 191 S. W. 379 . … That he has no such right is established by the decision of this court upon the precise question in Perrett v, Wegner, 139 S. W. 984, 988 .

Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. Sanders

265 S.W.2d 219 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 11, 1954

Packard-Dallas, Inc. v. Carle, Tex.Civ.App., 163 S.W.2d 735 , wr. den., w. o. m.; to the same effect is Southwestern Hotel Co. v. Rogers, Tex.Civ.App., 183 S.W.2d 751 . See also Laird v. … Brown, Tex.Civ.App., 210 S.W.2d 276 ; Senegar v. La Vaughan, Tex.Civ.App., 230 S.W.2d 311 . It is held in the case of Butcher v.

Protz v. State

681 S.W.2d 296 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 15, 1984

Warren v. State, 514 S.W.2d 458, 463 (Tex.Crim.App.1974); Hall v. State, 373 S.W.2d 252, 253 (Tex.Crim.App.1963). Here the offense alleged is unauthorized use of a vehicle. … Jackson v. State, 645 S.W.2d 303 (Tex.Crim.App.1983); Anthony v. State, 628 S.W.2d 151 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1982, no pet.).

Harris County Appraisal District v. Virginia Indonesia Co.

871 S.W.2d 864 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 10, 1994

VICO protested to the Harris County Appraisal Review Board (the “Board”), and the Board upheld the tax. … Dallas County Appraisal Dist. v.

George v. Texas and New Orleans Railroad Company

290 S.W.2d 264 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 26, 1956

Co. of Texas v. Davis, Tex.Civ.App., 110 S.W. 939 (error refused); Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Moss, Tex.Civ.App., 180 S.W. 1128 (error refused); Smith v. … Galveston-Houston Electric Railway Co., Tex.Civ.App., 176 S.W. 737 ; Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone & Co., 153 Cal. 571 , 96 P. 84 , 19 L.R.A.,N.S., 1094; Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Brown, 11 Tex.Civ.

Vickers v. Carnahan

4 Tex. Civ. App. 305 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 4, 1893

Reed v. Spikes, 15 S. W. Rep., 122 . … Wilson v. Leslie, 20 Ohio, 166. This view, adopted by the Supreme Court of Kansas (McVeigh v. English, 30 Kansas, 368), and evidently approved by the Supreme Court of the United States (Gibson v.

Moorman v. Hunnicutt

325 S.W.2d 941 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 27, 1959

In Jordan v. … Cubley v.

Cannel Coal Co. v. Luna

144 S.W. 721 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 17, 1912

Speaking on this subject, it was said by the Supreme Court of Minnesota in Browning v. … *Page 725 Latham v. Pledger, 11 Tex. 439 ; Wright v. Doherty, 50 Tex. 34 ; Coleman v. Colgate, 69 Tex. 88 , 6 S.W. 553 ; Noel v. Denman, 76 Tex. 306 , 13 S.W. 318 ; Tompkins v.

Arrechea v. Plantowsky

705 S.W.2d 186 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 21, 1985

CURTISS BROWN, Chief Justice. ■ This is an appeal from an order signed May 14, 1985 modifying a temporary injunction granted on July 1, 1982. … Id., See Board of Equalization of the City of Plano v. Wells, 473 S.W.2d 88, 91 (Tex.Civ. App.—Dallas 1971, no writ). It was Appel-lees’ choice to seek injunctive relief.

Girardeau v. Perkins

59 Tex. Civ. App. 552 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 11, 1910

(Gaylord v. Loughbridge, 50 Texas, 573 ; Campbell v. McCampbell, 34 S. W., 970 ; Building & Loan Assn. v. Logan, 33 S. W., 1089 ; Ellerman v. Wurz (Coms. of App.), 14 S. W., 333 .) … (Robertson v. Paul, 16 Texas, 472 ; McLane v. Paschal, 47 Texas, 365 ; Black v. Rockmore, 50 Texas, 94 ; Abney v. Pope, 52 Texas, 288 .) It was held in Rogers v.

Browne Grain Co. v. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank of Abilene

173 S.W. 942 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 9, 1915

Stat. 1911, arts. 2157-2163; Lovett v. Zeiss, 133 S. W. 497 ; Ross v. McGowen, 58 Tex. 603 ; Railway v. Peery, 27 S. … Browne, while' service was had on C. Y. Browne (the correct middle initial) and the, judgment was rendered against C. V. Browne. Williams et al. v. Abilene Independent Telegraph & Telephone Co., 168 S.

American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. of London v. Pace

23 Tex. Civ. App. 222 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 28, 1900

Buford v. Brown, 6 B. Mon. (Ky.), 554. … App., 241; Rohrbough v. Leopold, 68 Texas, 260 ; Wylie v. Posey, 71 Texas, 39 ; Baines v. Ullmann, 71 Texas, 536 ; Bluntzer v. Dewees, 79 Texas, 275 ; Schmick v. Noel, 72 Texas, 4 ; Burch v.

Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. City of Leon Valley

590 S.W.2d 729 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 17, 1979

Browning-Ferris, Inc., is a corporation in the business of collection, removal and disposal of commercial, industrial and residential solid waste. … In Gardner v.

McGee v. State

124 S.W.3d 253 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 6, 2003

Vidaurri v. State, 49 S.W.3d 880 (Tex.Crim.App.2001); Manuel v. State, 994 S.W.2d 658 (Tex.Crim.App.1999); Feagin v. State, 967 S.W.2d 417 (Tex.Crim.App.1998); Phynes v. State, 828 S.W.2d 1 (Tex.Crim.App.1992). … There are no objections, pleadings, or any evidence challenging Brown’s representation of appellant. See Tex.R.App. P. 33.1; Mosley v.

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Caswell

295 S.W. 653 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 2, 1927

Amerman v. Railway Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 182 S. W. 56 ; Thompson v. Maloney, 199 Ill. 276 , 65 N. E. 236 , 93 Am. St. Rep. 136 , 137; Dill v. Board of Education, 47 N. J. Eq. 421, 20 A. 739 , 10 L. R. A. 279; McKenzie v. … Calcasieu Lumber Co. v. Harris, 77 Tex. 18 , 13 S. W. 453 .

Couch v. Hale

404 S.W.2d 920 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 16, 1966

Lynch v. Ricketts, supra; English v. Miller, Tex.Civ.App., 43 S.W.2d 642 , wr. ref. … Lynch v. Ricketts, 158 Tex. 487 , 314 S.W.2d 273 ; De Winne v. Allen, 154 Tex. 316 , 277 S.W.2d 95 ; Intges v. Dunn, Tex.Civ.App., 311 S.W.2d 877 ; Lofland v. Jackson, Tex.Civ.App., 237 S.W.2d 785 ; Norris Bros. v.