Case law

Adams v. State

643 S.W.2d 423 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 20, 1982

United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1 , 97 S.Ct. 2476 , 53 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977) and Arkansas v. … Cady v.

Ogburn v. Ward County Irr. Dist. No. 1

267 S.W. 316 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 18, 1924

W. 71 ; Power v. Andrews (Tex. Civ. App.) 253 S. W. 870 ; Brown v. Bank (Tex. Civ. App.) 175 S. W. 1122 ; City of Sweetwater v. Baird, 102 Tex. 545 , 120 S. W. 854 . … Duck v. Peeler, 74 Tex. 269 , 11 S. W. 1111 ; Swenson v. McLaren, 2 Tex. Civ. App. 331 , 21 S. W. 300 ; Clawson Lumber Co. v. Jones, 20 Tex. Civ. App. 208 , 49 S.

Beacon National Insurance Co. v. Fenwick

557 S.W.2d 379 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 20, 1977

RALEIGH BROWN, Justice. This is a venue case. … Employers Casualty Company v. Clark, 491 S.W.2d 661 (Tex.1973); Mobile County Mutual Insurance Company v. Maldonado, 506 S.W.2d 639 (Tex.Civ.App.—San Antonio 1973, no writ).

Adams v. Texhoma Oil & Refining Co.

262 S.W. 139 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 14, 1924

Norwood v. Francis, 25 App. D. C. 463, 472, 4 Ann. Cas. 865. The active management and conduct of the affairs and business of the association was vested exclusively in the board of directors. … Such a provision, however, as it affects the rights of a stockholder in a corporation, was fully discussed by our Supreme Court in Seeligson v. Brown, 61 Tex. 114 , and cited in the notes in 57 Am. St.

City of Dallas v. Urbish

252 S.W. 258 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 28, 1923

Brown v. Levee Com., 50 Miss. 469 . … City of Austin v. Cemetery Ass’n, 87 Tex. 331 , 28 S. W. 528 , 47 Am. St. Rep. 114 ; Lossing v. Hughes (Tex. Civ. App.) 244 S. W. 560 ; Houston v. Richter (Tex. Civ. App.) 157 S. W. 189 .

Simpson v. Williams Rural High School Dist.

153 S.W.2d 852 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 30, 1941

In Cotulla v. … This text is supported by the holdings in Chrestman v. Tompkins, Tex.Civ.App., 5 S.W.2d 257 ; Brown et al. v. Reese, 69 Tex. 589 , 7 S.W. 489 ; Harkness v.

Sanger v. Slayden

7 Tex. Civ. App. 605 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 6, 1894

McCarren v. McNulty, 7 Gray, 139 ; Brown v. Foster, 113 Mass., 136 .” In Tyler v. … Citing McCarren v. McNulty, 7 Gray, 139 ; Brown v. Foster, 113 Mass., 136 ; Id., 18 Am. Rep., 463 ; Zaleski v. Clark, 44 Conn., 218 ; Id., 26 Am. Rep., 446 .

Republic Supply Co. v. Waggoner

283 S.W. 537 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 24, 1926

Morgan made a motion that the board of directors accept the proposition of Messrs. … “No other business coming before the board the meeting was declared adjourned. “Approved: [Signed] “S. A. L. Morgan, Vice President. “[Seal] V. D. Tennyson, Secretary.”

Jones v. State Board of Trustees of the Employees Retirement System of Texas

505 S.W.2d 361 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 31, 1974

State, 110 Tex.Cr.R. 337 , 8 S.W.2d 174 (1928); City of Fort Worth v. Morrison, 164 S.W.2d 771 (Tex.Civ.App. — Fort Worth 1942, writ ref’d); Anderson v. State, 149 Tex.Cr.R. 423 , 195 S.W.2d 368 (1946); and Uhr v. … Brown, 191 S.W. 379 (Tex.Civ.App. — San Antonio 1916, no writ). We have examined these cases and find that they are clearly distinguishable from the factual situation here presented.

American Surety Co. of New York v. Hill County

254 S.W. 241 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 2, 1923

It constitutes the executive board for administering the affairs, of the county. State Constitution, art. 5, § 18; Elec. Light Co. v. Keenan, 88 Tex. 201 , 30 S. W. S68. … The. decision in Eant v.

City of Houston v. Baker

178 S.W. 820 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 25, 1915

Browne, assessor and collector of taxes for said city, and the said Pastoriza, Halverton, Pitzgerald, and Browne, who constitute the board of appraisement of said city, prasdng for a writ of injunction and mandamus against … Railway v. Kone, 122 S. W. 424 . In Langley v. Smith, 126 S.

Dancy v. Wells

8 S.W.2d 198 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 6, 1928

Brown, and J. R. … Brown, and J. R.

In re G. T. H.

541 S.W.2d 527 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 16, 1976

RALEIGH BROWN, Justice. This is an appeal by minor, G.T.H., from the denial of his application for Writ of Habeas Corpus for release from a facility that has not been certified as suitable for the detention of children. … Section 51.12, Texas Family Code, provides in part: “(c) In each county, the juvenile board, or if there is none, the judge of the juvenile court, shall personally inspect the detention facilities at least annually and shall

Gonzales v. State

666 S.W.2d 496 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 19, 1983

New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971); Brown v. State, 617 S.W.2d 196 (Tex.Cr.App.1981); Howard v. State, 599 S.W.2d 597, 603 (Tex.Cr.App.1979). … Brown v. State, supra. Officer Franks saw two plastic bottles half-filled with an orange substance which he believed was methadone. He based his belief on prior narcotics experience.

Presidio County v. Walker

29 Tex. Civ. App. 609 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 4, 1902

Waller County v. Rankin, 35 S. W. Rep., 876 ; Beard v. City of Decatur, 64 Texas, 7 ; Bastrop County v. Hearne, 70 Texas, 563 ; Wall v. McConnell, 65 Texas, 397 ; Trinity County v. … His salary, which is an incident to and runs with his office for its entire term (Brown v. Galveston Wharf Company, 92 Texas, 524 ), is derived solely from such commissions.

San Antonio Independent School Dist. v. Board of Trustees of San Antonio Electric & Gas System

204 S.W.2d 22 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 3, 1947

San Antonio Independent District v. Water Works Board of Trustees, Tex.Civ.App., 120 S.W.2d 861 (W.Ref.); A&M Consolidated Independent School Dist. v. City of Bryan, 148 Tex. 348 , 184 S.W.2d 914 . … In the case of City of El Paso v. Carroll, supra, the municipally owned waterworks were operated by a board of trustees. It is deemed useless to labor the matter further. That case governs here.

Lo-Vaca Gathering Co. v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad

476 S.W.2d 732 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 9, 1972

Brown characterized Noah Webster’s “multifarious grammars” as “despised” and gave Samuel Worcester less than honorable mention. The three grammarians Dr. Brown accepted were Dr. Brown himself and two others. … Brown himself commits the now condemned “comma blunder.”

Bray v. Compton

376 S.W.2d 436 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 12, 1964

V. M. Brown, and from taking custody of the minor. The decree also overruled the pleas of privilege filed by each of the defendants to be sued in Hansford County, Texas. … Citing Atlantic Oil Producing Co. v. Jackson, 116 Tex. 570 , 296 S.W. 283 . See also First Nat. Bank in Dallas v. Hannay, 123 Tex. 203 , 67 S.W.2d 215 , Sup.Ct., Per Curiam opinion. Our Supreme Court, in Renfroe v.

Huxford v. Kingsbury

240 S.W. 1028 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 6, 1922

When he and Brown met, they both stopped, and appellant went across to deliver Brown a wrench which the latter needed for some purpose about his car. … Appellant was corroborated by the testimony of his employer, Brown.

Wilk v. Standard Fire Insurance Co.

765 S.W.2d 515 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 18, 1989

Co. of America v. Goad, 677 S.W.2d 795 (Tex.App.—Port Worth 1984, writ ref’d n.r.e.); American States Ins. Co. v. Cadell, 644 S.W.2d 884 (Tex.App.—Tyler 1982, no writ); and Texas Employers’ Ins. Ass’n v. … See Smith v. City of Austin, 670 S.W.2d 743 (Tex.App.—Tyler 1984, no writ); United General Ins. Exchange v. Brown, 628 S.W.2d 505 (Tex.App.—Amarillo 1982, no writ).