Case law

Langley v. Smith

59 Tex. Civ. App. 584 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 12, 1910

In the ease of Engelke v. Schlenker, 75 Texas, 559 , Judge Henry, delivering the opinion of the court, adopted the view contended for by appellees, but in the case of Lively v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. … The same question arose in the case of Taylor v. Louisville & N. R. R. Co., 88 Fed., 364 , 31 C. C. A., 537 .

Webre v. Sneed

358 S.W.3d 322 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 28, 2011

O’Neil, 550 A.2d 1105 , 1107 n. 1 (Del.1988); see also Brown v. … Brown, 126 Ill.Dec. 545 , 532 N.E.2d at 233 ; see also Pessin v.

State v. Houston & T. C. Ry. Co.

209 S.W. 820 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 19, 1918

Woud v. City of Galveston, 76 Tex. 126 , 13 S.W. 227 ; Carlile v. Eldridge, 1 White W. Civ.Cas.Ct.App. § 989; Fort Worth v. Davis, 57 Tex. 225 ; Baker v. Panola County, 30 Tex. 87 ; Brown v. Graham, 58 Tex. 255 . … In Brown v. Graham, 58 Tex. 254 , the court said: "The county commissioners' court can levy no taxes unless the power to do so be plainly and unmistakably conferred."

Dealers National Insurance Company v. Simmons

421 S.W.2d 669 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 8, 1967

From an adverse ruling of the Industrial Accident Board he duly perfected his appeal to the trial court. … Co. v.

Carr v. Grand Lodge, United Bros. of Friendship of Texas

189 S.W. 510 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 9, 1916

Co. v. DeWalt, 96 Tex. 121 , 70 S. W. 531 , 97 Am. St. … W., v.

Leal v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co.

605 S.W.2d 328 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 16, 1980

CURTISS BROWN, Chief Justice. This is a workers’ compensation case. Appellant, Andres C. … Leal brought this suit against Appellee, Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin to appeal the award of the Industrial Accident Board.

Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co. v. Baker

260 S.W. 223 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 1, 1924

Co. of Am. v. Stewart, 237 Fed. 70 , 150 C. C. A. 272 , 6 A. L. R. 766; McMasters v. N. Y. Life Ins. Co., 183 U. S. 25 , 22 Sup. Ct. 10, 46 L. Ed. 64 . The Supreme Court in the case of U. S. v. … Co. of America v.

Allen v. Franks

166 S.W. 384 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 14, 1914

Appellant has cited many authorities, such as Brown v. Roland, 92 Tex. 54 , 45 S.W. 795 , Hutchins v. Masterson, 46 Tex. 551 , 26 Am.Rep. 286 , and Jones v. … the board and extending beyond the terms of office of all the members of the board was against public policy and void, and in that case the following language is used: "In Craft v.

Henry v. American Airlines, Inc.

413 S.W.2d 123 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 3, 1967

Brown & Root v. Haddad, 142 Tex. 624 , 180 S.W.2d 339, 342 ; Hammon v. Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company, Tex.Civ.App., 382 S.W.2d 155, 160 (ref. n. r. e.) ; Blanton v. E. & L. … Transport, 146 Tex. 377 , 207 S.W.2d 368, 369 ; Quintero v. Sinclair Refining Company, 5 Cir., 311 F.2d 217 ; Brown v. Dallas Gas Company, Tex.Civ.App., 42 S.W.2d 869 (writ ref.); Webb v.

August A. Busch Co. v. Caufield

135 S.W. 244 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 1, 1911

In Brown v. Ruse, 69 Tex. 589 , 7 S. … Leake County, 42 Miss. 237 ; Attala County v. Grant, 9 Smedes & M. (Miss.) 77, 47 Am. Dec. 102 . On the want of the right of the board to reconsider and rescind its action at a subsequent term, see Graham v.

Bridges v. Texas a & M University System

790 S.W.2d 831 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 24, 1990

CURTISS BROWN, Chief Justice. This is a Workers’ Compensation case in which the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of appellee, Texas A & M University System (the University). … In Traders & General Insurance Co. v.

White v. Bolner

223 S.W.2d 686 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 28, 1949

Reagan v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co., [ 154 U.S. 362 , 14 S.Ct. 1047 , 38 L.Ed. 1014 ], supra; Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co. [ 126 Tex. 296 , 83 S.W.2d 935 , 99 A.L.R. 1107 ], supra. … Letwin v. Gulf Oil Corp., Tex.Civ.App., 164 S.W.2d 234 , error refused; Texas Liquor Control Board v. Floyd, Tex.Civ.App., 117 S.W.2d 530 ; Miller v.

Courtney v. University of Texas System

806 S.W.2d 277 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 21, 1991

Haden v. … Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972) and its companion case, Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

McFadden v. American United Life Insurance Co.

643 S.W.2d 232 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 24, 1982

BROWN, Justice. … Kelley v. Texas State Board of Medical Examiners, 467 S.W.2d 539, 542 (Tex.Civ.App.

William Marsh Rice University v. Birdwell

624 S.W.2d 661 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 15, 1981

Brown or Garnett Birdwell”; First City National Bank, Account No. 01-3397-3, styled “J. C. Brown or Margaret S. Brown”; Texas Commerce Bank, Account No. 8328320, styled “J. C. … Krueger v. Williams, 163 Tex. 545 , 359 S.W.2d 48, 51-52 (1962); Brown v. Lane, 383 S.W.2d 649, 650 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas 1964, writ ref’d).

Murphy v. McDermott Inc.

807 S.W.2d 606 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 14, 1991

Executives representing appellee authorized up to $8.8 million for the purchase of the equipment subject to the approval of the chairman of the board. … Brown Oil Tools, Inc. v. Broughton, 353 S.W.2d 505, 506 (Tex.Civ.App. — Houston 1962, writ ref’d); Keener v. Cleveland, 250 S.W. 151 (Tex.Comm’n App.1923, judgm’t adopted).

Buchanan v. Wren

10 Tex. Civ. App. 560 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 15, 1895

See also Hereth v. Bank, 34 Ind., 380 ; Doherty v. Perry, 38 Ind., 15 ; Bank v. Barrett, 38 Ga., 126 ; Heard v. Bank, 8 Neb., 16 ; Kelley v. Whitney, 45 Wis., 110 ; Stevenson v. O’Neal, 71 Ill., 314 ; Siegel v. … As to constructive notice, it is settled by the decided cases (Board v. Railway, 46 Texas, 316 ; Gannon v. Bank, 83 Texas, 274 ), that if the note sued on is a negotiable instrument, the suit by J.

Brazos Valley Harvestore Systems, Inc. v. Beavers

535 S.W.2d 797 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 8, 1976

Brown v. Gulf Television Co., 157 Tex. 607 , 306 S.W.2d 706 (1957). This well-established rule is used to determine which, if any, venue exception applies to the circumstances of the case. See Shelton v. … While there is no direct evidence that appellant’s employees installed the 2 X 4-inch board, the venue facts of subdivision 9a may be established by circumstantial evidence. Bearden v.

Kingsville Independent School Dist. v. Crenshaw

164 S.W.2d 49 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 8, 1942

In Sabine & East Texas Railway Company v. … McCammon & Lang Lumber Co. v. Trinity & B. V. R. Co., 104 Tex. 8 , 133 S.W. 247 , 36 L.R.A.,N.S., 662, Ann. Cas.1913E, 870; Shelton v. City of Abilene, Tex.Civ.App., 80 S.W.2d 351 ; Duvall v.

Texas-New Mexico Power Co. v. Texas Industrial Energy Consumers

786 S.W.2d 795 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 2, 1990

See Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. … Ass’n v. Texas Air Control Board, 586 S.W.2d 634 (Tex.Civ.App.1979, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Railroad Com’n v. Ennis Transp. Co., 695 S.W.2d 706 (Tex.App.1985, writ ref'd n.r.e.).