Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstexapp

10,000+ results

0.86s

  • Kerby v. Collin County

    212 S.W.2d 494 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 28, 1948

    Co. v. … In Colonial Trust Co. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Lloyds America v. Lloyds Southwest Insurers

    56 S.W.2d 477 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 11, 1933

    Co. v. School Board (Tex. Civ. App.) 51 S.W.(2d) 642 ; Brown v. Cox (Tex. Civ. App.) 53 S.W.(2d) 848 . … Weatherly v. White House Lumber Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 49 S.W.(2d) 522 ; American Fruit Growers v. Sutherland, supra ; Eckert-Burton Const. Co. v. School Board, supra. See, also, Johnson v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Florey Common School Dist. No. 5 v. County Board of School Trustees

    126 S.W.2d 536 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 2, 1939

    However, the Supreme Court has held that since such approval was unnecessary under Article 2922c, the approval of the board of each school district affected was not necessary. In Countz v. … Cox et al. v. Beard et al., Tex. Civ.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Swearingen v. Reed

    2 Tex. Civ. App. 364 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 16, 1893

    Lewis v. Simon, 72 Texas, 475 ; Callahan v. Houston, 78 Texas, 494 . Only creditors or subsequent purchasers without notice can question the validity of such a deed. De Garca v. Galvan, 55 Texas, 53 ;. Brown v. … Hall v. Hall, 52 Texas, 294 ; Martin Brown Co. v. Perrill, 77 Texas, 204 . 4.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Reagan v. Board of Firemen, Policemen & Fire Alarm Operators' Pension Fund Trustees

    307 S.W.2d 958 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 20, 1957

    The *959 trial court granted a summary judgment for the Board of Pension Fund Trustees and denied the refund. The Board admitted every allegation of Reagan. Willoughby v. Jones, 151 Tex. 435 , 251 S.W.2d 508 . … Pennie v. Reis, 132 U.S. 464, 470, 471 , 10 S.Ct. 149, 151 , 33 L.Ed. 426 ; Clarke v. Reis, 87 Cal. 543 , 25 P. 759 ; Jolly v. City of Bremerton, 31 Wash.2d 873 , 199 N.E.2d 587 ; Fraser v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. Patten

    238 S.W. 240 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 8, 1922

    W. 1089 ; Avery v. Llano Cotton Seed Oil Mill Association (Tex. Civ. App.) 196 S. W. 353 (2); Kuykendall v. Schell (Tex. Civ. App.) 224 S. W. 303 (1); Fink v. Brown (Tex. Com. App.) 215 S. W. 843 ; Roberts v. … Parish v. Wheeler, 22 N. Y. 494 ; Thomas v. Railroad Company [ 101 U. S. 82 ].” In the case of Fink v. Brown (Tex. Civ. App.) 183 S.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Hamlett v. Coates

    182 S.W. 1144 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 18, 1915

    Trawick v. Martin-Brown Co., 79 Tex. 460 , 14 S. W. 564 ; Ainsa et al. v. Moses et al., 100 S. W. 791 ; Evans Co. v. Kingsbury, 25 S. W. 729 ; Landes v. Eichelberger, 2 Willson Civ. Cas. Ct. App. §§ 133, 134. … In Trawick v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • INTERSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Arrington

    307 S.W.2d 146 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 12, 1957

    In one case, Baughn v. … See Traweek v. Martin-Brown Co., 79 Tex. 460 , 14 S.W. 564 ; Executions, Tex.Jur. 725. However, be that as it may, it is thought that this case is controlled by other well-recognized rules. In such cases as House v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Europa Cruises Corp. v. AFEC International

    809 S.W.2d 783 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 13, 1991

    Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, supra; Spears v. Brown, 567 S.W.2d 544 (Tex.Civ.App. — Texarkana 1978, writ ref’d n.r.e.). … Spears v. Brown, supra; Ivey v. Carrell, supra; Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, supra. Europa has "set up” a meritorious defense in its Motion to Vacate Default Judgment and for New Trial.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Farwell v. Babcock, Administratrix

    27 Tex. Civ. App. 162 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 18, 1901

    In Electric Belt Line v. … In Alexander v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • City of Lake Dallas v. Lake Cities Municipal Utility Authority

    555 S.W.2d 163 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Aug 4, 1977

    The City cites three cases for its proposition that art. 8280-293 is not a local law: County of Cameron v, Wilson, 160 Tex. 25 , 326 S.W.2d 162 (1959); Brown v. … Jefferson County v. Board of County and Dist. R. Indebt., 143 Tex. 99 , 182 S.W.2d 908 (1944).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Gossett v. TIDEWATER ASSOCIATED OIL COMPANY

    436 S.W.2d 416 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 19, 1968

    Jones v. Siler, 129 Tex. 18 , 100 S.W.2d 352, 353 ; Republic Production Co. v. Lee, 132 Tex. 254 , 121 S.W.2d 973 ; Parr v. Ratisseau (Tex.Civ.App.), 236 S.W.2d 503 , n. r. e.; Page v. … Page v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation, supra; First State Bank of Wichita Falls v. Oak Cliff Savings & Loan Association, Tex., 387 S.W.2d 369 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Walker v. Pittman

    18 Tex. Civ. App. 519 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 5, 1898

    Brown with his papers in his trunk. He was a single man, and boarded with his friend and partner in business, Willet Holmes. … McDow v. Rabb, 56 Texas, 168 ; Wells v. Burt, 22 S. W. Rep., 419 ; Johnson v. Lyford, 9 Texas Civ. App., 85; Hickman v. Gillman, 66 Texas, 314 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Houston Oil Co. v. Gallup

    50 Tex. Civ. App. 369 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 23, 1908

    Lewis by surveyor David Brown. … And see Pendleton v. Shaw, 18 Texas Civ. App., 439; Soye v. Maverick, 18 Texas, 101 ; Lyne v. Sanford, 82 Texas, 61 ; Marks v. Hill, 46 Texas, 349 ; Hill v. Kerr, 78 Texas, 218 ; State v. Zanco’s Heirs, 18 Texas Civ.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Holland

    168 S.W. 11 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 30, 1914

    Brown Candy & Cracker Co. v. City of Dallas, 104 Tex., 290 , 137 S. … Campbell v. Cook, 86 Tex. 630 , 26 S. W. 486 , 40 Am. St. Rep. 878 ; Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Chowning, 86 Tex. 654 , 26 S. W. 982 , 24 L. R. A. 504; St. Louis, S. F. & T. Ry. Co. v. Taylor, 134 S. W. 819 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Byrnes v. University of Houston

    507 S.W.2d 815 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 13, 1974

    CURTISS BROWN, Justice. This is a suit for a declaratory judgment and for the recovery of money paid. … The Supreme Court in Texas Liquor Control Bd. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. Booth

    113 S.W.2d 231 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 18, 1937

    Brown, at Sherman, Texas.” The said claim for compensation was filed by the plaintiff, Gus Booth, witnessed by Ruth Bolton, and received by said board on March 18, 1935. … Brown. I kept working. The place (protrusion) was getting larger all the time.”

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Oliver Lane Chambers, Donna Kay Chambers-Jones, Rhonda Thompson, Clinton L. Chambers and Wife, Brandi N. Chambers v. San Augustine County Appraisal District

    514 S.W.3d 420 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 8, 2017

    Freeway L.P. v. Harris Cty. Appraisal Dist., 370 S.W.3d 373, 376 (Tex. 2012) (per curiam). SCAD did not move to correct the error and is bound by the judgment. See Charles Brown, L.L.P. v. … Browning Oil Co. v. Luecke, 38 S.W.3d 625, 634 (Tex. App.−Austin 2000, pet. denied) (op. on reh’g).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Great American Indemnity Company v. Gravell

    297 S.W.2d 371 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 12, 1956

    Guerra v. State, 155 Tex.Cr.R. 306 , 234 S.W.2d 866, 868, 869 . They are not necessarily the equivalent of “instantaneous.” Layton v. Hammond-Brown-Jennings Co., 190 S.C. 425 , 3 S.E.2d 492 ; Etter v. … Co. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • James v. Board of Trustees of the Eagle Pass Independent School District

    376 S.W.2d 956 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 25, 1964

    Mission Independent School Dist. v. Diserens, 144 Tex. 107 , 188 S.W.2d 568 , 161 A.L.R. 877 ; Daniel v. Dallas Ind. School Dist., Tex.Civ.App., 351 S.W.2d 356 ; Murray v. … San Augustine County Board of School Trustees, Tex.Civ.App., 307 S.W.2d 622 ; Hinojosa v. San Isidro Ind. School Dist., Tex.Civ.App., 273 S.W.2d 656 ; Bear v. Donna Ind. School Dist., Tex.Civ.App., 74 S.W.2d 179 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.