Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstex

8,088 results

5.17s

  • Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc. v. Anderson

    524 S.W.2d 681 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1975

    Likewise, in Vann v. … Whittington, acting director of Field Operations Division of the Texas Water Quality Board testified that the maximum amount of suspended solids as set by the Board was 30 parts per million, that in August 1966, tests showed

    Overruled on other grounds by Burk Royalty Co. v. Walls, 24 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 429 (1981)Cited 91 timesPublished
  • Austin Independent School District v. City of Sunset Valley

    17 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 72 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1973

    City of Bloomfield v. Davis County Com. Sch. Dist., 254 Iowa 900 , 119 N.W.2d 909 (1963); Lauderdale County Board of Education v. Alexander, 269 Ala. 79 , 110 So.2d 911 (1959). … City of Bloomfield v. Davis County Com. Sch. Dist., supra; Lauderdale County Board of Education v. Alexander, supra.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Laird v. Thomas

    22 Tex. 276 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1858

    As to the sufficiency of the petition to charge the wife’s separate property, see the case of Brown and another v. John Ector and wife, 19 Tex. Rep. 346 . … In the case of Hutchinson v. Owen, 20 Tex.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Texas General Indemnity Co. v. Scott

    152 Tex. 1 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1952

    Ass’n. v. Godwin, supra; Wright v. Traders & General Ins. Co., Com. App., 132 Texas 172 , 123 S.W. 2d 314 ; Fox v. Dallas Hotel Co., 111 Texas 461 , 240 S.W. 517 ; Consolidated Underwriters v. … He was employed to make an examination and file a report thereof with the Industrial Accident Board.

    Cited 83 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Thomas

    141 Tex. 591 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1943

    R. 398; Allen-Bradley Local No. 1111 v. Wisconsin Employment Relation Board, 237 Wis. 164 , 295 N. W. 791 ; Fansteel Metallurgical Corp. v. Lodges 66, 295 111. App. 323, 14 N. E. (2d) 991; Davega City Radio, Inc. v. … Wisconsin Labor Relation Board v. Fred Rueping Leather Co., 228 Wis. 473 , 279 N. W. 673 , 117 A. L. R. 398.

    Reversed by Thomas v. Collins, 323 U.S. 516 (1945)Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Robstown Independent School District v. Anderson

    29 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 256 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1986

    Pursuant to section 41.41 a property owner is entitled to protest before the appraisal review board a determination that he is the owner of property. … Any assessment after the effective date of the code must be protested before the appraisal review board or the defense of non-ownership is waived. See Brooks v. Backus, 661 S.W.2d 288 (Tex.App.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Salmon v. Salmon

    9 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 34 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1965

    In this respect the case is quite different from Bryant v. Browning, Tex.Civ.App., 48 S.W.2d 798 (wr. dis.), and the decisions there cited. … Franke v. Cheatham, 157 Tex. 397 , 303 S.W.2d 355 ; Brown v. Burke, Tex.Civ.App., 26 S.W.2d 415 (no writ); Stringfellow v. Early, 15 Tex.Civ.App. 597 , 40 S.W. 871 (no writ). See also Wade v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Walters v. Jewett

    28 Tex. 192 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1866

    Jewett, on a certificate issued to him on the 27th day of March, 1838, by the board of land commissioners of Bed Biver county, as assignee of said Hezekiah Walters. … But if there be a distinction between this and the ease of Webb v. Webb, there is a more palpable and manifest one between it and that of Wilkinson v. Wilkinson.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Consolidated Independent School District v. Texas Political Subdivisions Property/Casualty Joint Self-Insurance Fund

    50 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 344 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 29, 2006

    See Harris County Flood Control Dist. v. … As the Fund has acknowledged, its members elect a governing board, and a board subcommittee resolves claims disputes. To that extent, at least, the Fund’s members provide services to the Fund.

    Cited 313 timesPublished
  • Thomson v. Baker

    90 Tex. 163 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1896

    Beers v. Arkansas, 20 How. (U. S.), 537; In re Ayers, 123 U. S., 443 ; State v. Hill, 54 Ala. 67 ; Ex parte Alabama, 53 Ala. 231 ; Board of Pub. Works v. Gannt, 76 a., 455; Baltzer v. State, 104 N. C., 365 ; State v. … See also Hosner v. De Young, 1 Texas, 764 ; Peck v. Moody, 23 Texas, 93 ; Durrett v. Crosby, 28 Texas, 687 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Pryor v. Jolly

    91 Tex. 86 · Texas Supreme Court · May 31, 1897

    Trawick v. Martin-Brown Co., 74 Texas, 522 . In the case just cited the identical question was presented. A plea, in abatement had been filed and at the same time exceptions had also been filed. … De Cordova v. Bahn, 74 Texas, 643 ; O’Brien v. Gilleland, 79 Texas, 602 .

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Stockwell v. State

    110 Tex. 550 · Texas Supreme Court · May 12, 1920

    Other authorities are People v. Board of Health, 140 N. Y., 1 , 37 Am. St. Rep., 522 , 23 L. R. A., 481, 35 N. E., 320 ; Hutton v. City of Camden, 10 Vroom, 122 (39 N. J. Law), 23 Am. Rep., 203 ; First Natl. Bank of Mt. … Vernon v. Sarlls, 129 Ind., 201 , 13 L. R. A., 421, 28 Am. St. Rep., 185 , 28 N. E., 434 ; Tiedeman’s Limitations of Police Power, sec. 122a.

    Cited 61 timesPublished
  • Laas v. Seidel

    95 Tex. 442 · Texas Supreme Court · May 1, 1902

    BROWN, Associate Justice. … Canales v. Perez, 65 Texas, 293 ; Warner v. Bailey, 7 Texas, 517 .

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Neal v. Bartleson

    65 Tex. 478 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1886

    Logan v. Farlie, 1 Jacob 193; Stephens v. James, 1 Mylne & Keen 627; Hoyt v. Sprague, 103 U. S. 631 ; Rice’s Case, 42 Mich. 530 ; Leonard v Putnam, 51 N. H. 249; Farrington, v. Wilson, 29 Wis. 400 ; Bari v. … Brown v.Christie, 27Tex. 73; Guilford v. Levi, 49 Tex. 717 ; Murchison v. White, 54 Tex. 78 ; Fitz v. Fitz, 21 Tex. 511 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • W.O. Bankston Nissan, Inc. v. Walters

    31 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 406 · Texas Supreme Court · May 11, 1988

    Farrell v. Hunt, 714 S.W.2d 298, 300 (Tex.1986); Brown v. American Transfer & Storage Co., 601 S.W.2d 931, 939 (Tex.1980). … Leyendecker & Associates, Inc. v. Wechter, 683 S.W.2d 369, 373 (Tex.1984); Sobel v. Jenkins, 477 S.W.2d 863 (Tex.1972); Chrysler Corp. v. Schuenemann, 618 S.W.2d 799, 805 (Tex.Civ.App.

    Cited 93 timesPublished
  • Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Day

    104 Tex. 237 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1911

    So in Hilts v. Chicago & G. T. R. … See also, Gilman v. Eastern R. Co., 90 Am. Dec., 210 , 13 Allen, 433 ; Wright v. New York Cent. R. Co., 25 N. Y., 566 ; Chicago & A. R. Co. v. Sullivan, 63 Ill., 293 ; Chapman v. Erie R. Co., 55 N. Y., 579 .

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Robert Allan Jorgensen v. State

    Texas Supreme Court · Jun 14, 2017

    Respectfully submitted, /s/ Stan Brown STAN BROWN P.O. … /S/ Stan Brown STAN BROWN 16

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Houston v. Lurie

    148 Tex. 391 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1949

    or agency, see: Bielecki v. … J. 812, Sec. 469; see also Board of Water Engineers v. McKnight, 111 Texas 82 , 229 S. W. 301 .

    Cited 58 timesPublished
  • In Re Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.

    49 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 329 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 3, 2006

    (citation omitted)); Tyus v. … V. Timing Considerations A.

    Cited 120 timesPublished
  • U.S. Shale Energy II, LLC, Raymond B. Roush, Ruthie Roush Dodge, and David E. Roush v. Laborde Properties, L.P., and Laborde Management, Llc

    Texas Supreme Court · Jun 29, 2018

    Hysaw, 483 S.W.3d at 11. 5 See generally Alford v. Krum, 671 S.W.2d 870 (Tex. 1984); Brown v. Havard, 593 S.W.2d 939 (Tex. 1980); Garrett v. Dils Co., 299 S.W.2d 904 (Tex. 1957); Tipps v. … We therefore hold that the Bryan deed reserved a floating 1/2 royalty interest. 9 In Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.