Case law

Republican Party of Texas v. Dietz

39 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 804 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1996

See generally O’Brien v. Brown, 409 U.S. 1, 5 , 92 S.Ct. 2718, 2720-21 , 34 L.Ed.2d 1 (1972) (per curiam).

Ann Berta Lodge, No. 42 v. Leverton

42 Tex. 18 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1874

(Wills v. Stradling, 3 Ves., 378, note a; Frame v. Dawson, 14 Ves., 386; 2 St. Eq., § 764; Browne St. Fraud, 488.) … (Browne on St. Fr. sec. 467.)

Love v. Wilcox

119 Tex. 256 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1930

In Judge Brown’s carefully considered opinion in the case of the City of Oak Cliff v. The State, 97 Texas, 391 , it is said: “In his treatise on Courts, Mr. … S., 73 ; Brewster v. Sherman, 195 Mass., 222 , 11 Ann. Cas., 418; Attorney General v. R. R. Companies, 35 Wis., 520 ; Elliott v. City of Detroit, 121 Mich., 612, 615 ; State v. Board of Presidents and Directors, St.

in Re Verna Francis Coley Thetford

574 S.W.3d 362 · Texas Supreme Court · May 24, 2019

See Henderson v. … Co. v. Syntek Fin.

Doubleday & Co., Inc. v. Rogers

27 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 494 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1984

Although Nate Rogers, the respondent herein, has served on the Optometry Board, he has never been indicted for practicing without a license. Dr. … In addition to his service on the Optometry Board, Dr. Rogers has conducted other public activities.

McCalla v. City of Rockdale

112 Tex. 209 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1922

McLennan County v. Boggess, 104 Texas, 311, 315-316 ; State v. Moore, 57 Texas, 307, 320-321 ; Hallman v. Campbell, 57 Texas, 54 . … McLennan County v. Boggess, supra.

General Services Commission v. Little-Tex Insulation Co.

39 S.W.3d 591 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 5, 2001

Co. v. Texas A & M Univ., 35 S.W.3d 654 (Tex.App.— Austin 1999); Little-Tex Insulation Co. v. General Servs. Comm’n, 997 S.W.2d 358 . … After exhausting its remedies under the contract, including a TAMU Board of Regents’ review, DalMac sued TAMU for more than $3 million. The trial court granted TAMU’s plea to the jurisdiction.

Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. Thompson, Trustee

139 Tex. 116 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1942

The contract was let by the Highway Department to its contractor (Brown & Root, Inc.). … Co. v. Amer. Indem. Co. (Com. App.), 15 S. W. (2d) 544 and Brown v. Palatine Ins. Co., 89 Texas 590 , 35 S. W. 1060 .

Bahn v. Savage

132 Tex. 113 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1938

Singer, Lee Lytton, Thomas Newton, Alston Terry, Allen V. Davis, J. M. Wilson, Mrs. Margaret Brown, Ed Williams, S. P. … Davis, be elected Special Judge by acclamation, and said motion having been passed unanimously, the Chairman declared Allen V.

Walling v. North Central Texas Municipal Water Authority

162 Tex. 527 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1961

No. 1 v. Guinn, Tex. Civ. App., 40 S.W. 2d 892 , wr. ref.; Kuhn v. City of Yoakum, Com. App., 6 S.W. 2d 91 ; Bowen v. Board of School Trustees, Tex. Civ. App., 16 S.W. 2d 424 (no wr.). But as pointed out in Miller v. … No. 1 v. Guinn, supra; King’s Estate v. School Trustees of Willacy County, Tex. Civ. App., 33 S.W. 2d 783 (wr. ref.).

Grier v. Grier

30 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 416 · Texas Supreme Court · May 6, 1987

D'Arco v. … D'Arco v.

Rabb v. Coleman

14 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 440 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1971

Markham & Brown Co. and Assoc., Tex.Civ.App., 452 S.W.2d 940 (n. r. e.). … Corporation v.

Gulf Production Co. v. Quisenberry

128 Tex. 347 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1936

Chester did not testify, but the boy who was with him, Hoy Brown, denied that the father had commanded them to leave the cellar, denied that Q. … Co. v. Rodriguez, 133 S.

City of Austin v. Travis County Landfill Co.

73 S.W.3d 234 · Texas Supreme Court · May 30, 2002

Brown, 73 F.3d at 1104-05 ; see also Persyn v. United States, 34 Fed. … See Brown, 73 F.3d at 1102 .

Turner v. Pruitt

161 Tex. 532 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1961

Wortham v. Walker, 133 Texas 255 , 128 S.W. 2d 1138,1150, 1151 ; United Production Corp. v. Hughes, 137 Texas 21 , 152 S.W. 2d 327, 331 ; State Board of Insurance v. Betts, 158 Texas 83 , 308 S.W. 2d 846, 848 . … See *535 State Board of Insurance v. Betts, 158 Texas 612 , 315 S.W. 2d 279, 286 (District Judge required to expunge orders from docket) ; Crane v.

Patton v. Nicholas

154 Tex. 385 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1955

Co. v. Milan, 17 S.W. 2d 844, 846-7 ; Prairie Lea Production Co. v. Tiller, 286 S.W. 638 , and Berkshire Petroleum Corp. v. Moore, 268 S.W. 484 , while Falfurrias Immigration Co. v. Spielhagen, 61 Texas Civ. … Co. v. Crawford, 45 S.W. 738 ; Williams v. Watt, 171 S.W. 266, 268 ; Toomey v. First Mortgage Trust Co., 177 S.W. 539, 541 ; Burnett v. Smith, 240 S.W. 1007, 1009 ; Yount v. Fagin, 244 S.W. 1036, 1039 ; and State v.

Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. Grace

144 Tex. 71 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1945

W. (2d) 112 ; Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Brown, 142 Texas 385 , 181 S. W. (2d) 68 . … As recently stated *76 by this court in Texas & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Brown, 142 Texas 385 , 181 S.

City of Marshall and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality v. City of Uncertain, Caddo Lake Area Chamber of Commerce and Tourism, Greater Caddo Lake Association, Caddo Lake Institute, John T. Echols and Barry L. Bennick

Texas Supreme Court · Jun 9, 2006

200 San Antonio, TX 78212 RE: Case Number: 03-1111 Court of Appeals Number: 03-03-00154-CV Trial Court Number: GN2-01217 Style: CITY OF MARSHALL AND TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY v. … Brown |

George Alexander D/B/A Zentner's Daughter Steakhouse v. Lynda's Boutique

47 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 564 · Texas Supreme Court · May 14, 2004

Both Lynda’s Boutique and the court of appeals have cited Brown v. Brookshires Grocery Store 23 for the proposition that a failure to conduct a dismissal hearing is error that is apparent from the face of the record. … But the notice in Brown is different from the notice in this case.

Fitzpatrick v. Pope

39 Tex. 314 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1873

In Howard v. York, 20 Texas, 570 , the court applied fthis term to the young of cattle produced in the order of .•nature; but in the case of De Blane v. … Lynch, 23 Texas, 26 , the court settled this- question, and this case was again -affirmed in Forbes v. Dunham, 24 Texas, 611 .