Case law

Ex Parte Jones

163 Tex. 513 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1962

See Plumly v. Plumly, Texas Civ. App., 210 S.W. 2d 177 , no wr. hist.; Turman v. Turman, 123 Texas 1 , 64 S.W. 2d 137 ; Tyner v. City of Port Arthur, 115 Texas 310 , 280 S.W. 523 ; Edwards v. … We do not have a situation such as was presented in the case of Mobley v. Mobley, supra.

Consolidated Casualty Insurance Co. v. Perkins

154 Tex. 424 · Texas Supreme Court · May 4, 1955

For good cause the board may, in meritorious cases, waive the strict compliance with the foregoing limitations as to notice, and the filing the claim before the board.” … See *429 Young v. Safety Casualty Co., Texas Civ. App., 168 S.W. 2d 884 , writ refused; Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. Williams, 129 Texas 51 , 99 S.W. 2d 905, 906 ; Texas Fire & Casualty Underwriters v.

Adoue v. Wettermark

94 Tex. 81 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1900

to take the case out of the general rule and to show jurisdiction in this court to grant the writ, claims that the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals overrules the decision of this court in the following cases: Neese v. … Radford, 83 Texas, 585 ; Trawick v. Martin-Brown Co., 79 Texas, 460 ; and Kirbs *82 v. Provine, 78 Texas, 353 .

Davis v. Jefferies

32 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 221 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1989

Woods Exploration & Producing Co. v. Arkla Equip. Co., 528 S.W.2d 568 (Tex.1975); Owen v. Brown, 447 S.W.2d 883 (Tex.1969). In this case the default judgment rendered by the trial court was erroneous. … See e.g., Kinnard v. Herlock, 20 Tex. 49 (1857); Santex Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. v. Venture Steel, Inc., 737 S.W.2d 55 (Tex.App.— San Antonio 1987, no writ).

Johnson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.

131 Tex. 357 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1938

It happened in December, 1932, and no claim was filed with the Industrial Accident- Board until about August 15, 1933, which *360 was beyond the six months period required by law. … Assn. v. Eaton, (Tex. Civ. App.) 69 S. W. (2d) 569 ; Morgan v. Petroleum Casualty Co., (Tex. Civ. App.) 40 S. W. (2d) 205 ; Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Bailey, (Tex. Civ. App.) 297 S.

Kinney-Shotts Investment Co. v. D. v. Brooks Co.

127 Tex. 307 · Texas Supreme Court · May 13, 1936

Brown et al. v. C. C. Peters (ante, p. 300), a companion case. The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is affirmed. Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court May 13, 1936.

Garvey v. Vawter

33 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 750 · Texas Supreme Court · Sep 19, 1990

Murray v. O & A Express Inc., 630 S.W.2d 633, 636 (Tex.1982). A proper pleading gives fair and adequate notice of the facts relied upon, enabling the opposing party to prepare a defense. Id,.; Roark v. … Brown v. Edwards Transfer Co., Inc., 764 S.W.2d 220, 223 (Tex.1988). Thus, in light of the petition’s explicit allegation of proximate cause, Vawter had ample notice that foreseeability was at issue.

Trevino v. Ortega

969 S.W.2d 950 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1998

App. 136 , 445 N.W.2d 795, 797 (1989) (no cause of action under facts of case); Brown v. … Rep. 258 (K.B.1617) (applying the spoliation inference); The Pizarra, 15 U.S. (2 Wheat.) 227 , 4 L.Ed. 226 (1817) (declining to apply the spoliation inference); Brown, 856 S.W.2d at 56 (noting that Missouri has recognized

San Antonio Traction Co. v. Settle

104 Tex. 142 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1911

In the case of Wilkinson v. … Co. of Texas v. Bolton, 36 Texas Civ. App., 87, 81 S.

State ex rel. Shook v. All Texas Racing Ass'n

128 Tex. 384 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1936

Article 4664, which defines a common nuisance, is as follows : “Any hotel, rooming house or boarding house, country club, garage, rent car stand or other place to which the public commonly resort for board or lodging or commonly … It is only any “hotel, rooming house or boarding house, country club, garage, rent car stand or other place to which the public commonly resort for board or lodging or commonly congregate for business or pleasure” which becomes

T. & P. R'y Co. v. Chapman

57 Tex. 75 · Texas Supreme Court · May 2, 1882

R’y Co. v. Ogier, 35 Pa. St., 71. 3d. … Co., 113 Mass., 370 ; Pollock v. East. R. Co., 124 Mass., 158 ; R. R. Co. v. Ogier, 35 Pa. St., 71. Our examination of the charge satisfies us that it is a fair presentation of the law applicable to the case.

Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. Jones

109 Tex. 89 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1917

Smith v. Jones, 103 Texas, 632 , 132 S. W., 469 , 31 L. R. A. (N. S.), 153; Craig v. Cartwright, 65 Texas, 413 , and Word v. Drouthett are among the decisions so holding. It was not the purpose of Stevens v. … Pedregon to overrule this established holding of the court, though there is an expression in Chief Justice Brown’s opinion that is to some extent confusing.

Matter of Thacker

881 S.W.2d 307 · Texas Supreme Court · Sep 8, 1994

State Bar of Texas v. Heard, 603 S.W.2d 829, 835 (Tex.1980). … Disciplinary P. 1.06(U); see State Bar v. Heard, 603 S.W.2d 829, 835 (Tex.1980); Muniz v. State, 575 S.W.2d 408, 411 (Tex.Civ.App.—Corpus Christi 1978), writ ref'd n.r.e.); Turton v. State Bar , 775, 712, 717 (Tex.App.

Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Minaz Chamadia, and Vijay Lakshmi Yogi v. Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation

Texas Supreme Court · Jun 26, 2015

See, e.g., United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875); Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896) overruled by Brown v. Bd. of Ed., 347 U.S. 483 (1954). … Ever since Parker v. Brown 80-plus years ago,105 such boards were deemed outside the Act’s ban on cartels because, unlike traditional cartels, they were sanctioned by the state.106 No more.

Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.

108 Tex. 96 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1916

It vests no judicial power in the Industrial Accident Board which it creates. That board is but an administrative agency provided for the proper execution of the Act. … Co. v. Board of Directors, 103 Ark., 127, 145 S. W., 892 ; Beach v. Leahy, 11 Kan., 23 . The Act, in our opinion, is in its several provisions a constitutional law. The respective certified questions are so answered.

Shults v. State

28 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 175 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1984

Owen v. Brown, 447 S.W.2d 883 (Tex.1969); United Ass’n of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Indus, v. Borden, 160 Tex. 203 , 328 S.W.2d 739 (1959); Grogan Mfg. Co. v. … Co. v. Arkla Equip.

Vera v. D. v. Brooks Co.

127 Tex. 306 · Texas Supreme Court · May 13, 1936

Brown et al. v. C. C. Peters, a companion *307 case (ante, p. 300). The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is affirmed. Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court May 13, 1936.

Knight v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.

93 Tex. 417 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1900

BROWN, Associate Justice. The Court of Civil Appeals for the First Supreme Judicial District has certified to this court the following statement and questions: “John T. … Miller v. Rusk, 17 Texas, 170 ; Thompson v. Locke, 66 Texas, 383 .

Fairfield Insurance Co. v. Stephens Martin Paving, LP

51 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 491 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 15, 2008

Reinsurance Co. v. Jungling, 654 N.W.2d 530, 535-37 (Iowa 2002); Fluke Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indent. Co., 145 Wash.2d 137 , 34 P.3d 809, 814 (Wash.2001); Brown v. … Brown, 61 S.W.3d 368, 371 (Tex.2001); Lawrence, 44 S.W.3d at 553 (citations omitted); Wood Motor Co. v. Nebel, 150 Tex. 86 , 238 S.W.2d 181, 185 (1951).

Specialty Retailers, Inc. v. DeMoranville

933 S.W.2d 490 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1996

In Ricks , the Board of Trustees of a university denied tenure to a professor. 449 U.S. at 252 , 101 S.Ct. at 501 . … See Satterfield v. Satterfield, 448 S.W.2d 456, 460 (Tex.1969).