Case law

Ex Parte Abell

24 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 290 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1981

. *256 Brown, Maroney, Rose, Baker & Barber, Wayne Prescott and Walter H. Mizell, Austin, for relator. Kidd, Whitehurst & Harkness, William O. Whitehurst, Jr., Polly Durham, Suzanne Wood Brown, Austin, for respondent. … Richardelle, supra ; change of statutory standard of review, Butler v. State Board of Education, supra ; Cooper v. Texas Board of Medical Examiners, supra ; change in municipal annexation law, Deacon v.

Omaha Healthcare Center, LLC v. Johnson Ex Rel. Estate of Reed

54 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1314 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 2011

Johnson alleged that while Reed was being cared for by Omaha she was bitten by a brown recluse spider and died. … Partner, Inc. v. Rubio, 185 S.W.3d 842, 847 (Tex.2005) (describing health care as “broadly defined”).

Oriental Hotel Company v. Griffiths

30 L.R.A. 765 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1895

BROWN, Associate Justice. … Nelson v. Railway, 44 Iowa, 73 ; Brooks v. Railway, 101 U. S., 443 . In Brooks v.

Angela Horton and Kevin Houser v. the Kansas City Southern Railway Company

Texas Supreme Court · Jun 28, 2024

This 1 We received amicus briefs on rehearing from (1) the Texas Association of Defense Counsel and American Trucking Associations, (2) Harvey Brown and W. Daryl Moore, and (3) David M. Gunn and Russell S. … A person who sustains such damages as a result of a violation may assert a claim for those damages before the Surface Transportation Board and through a civil action to enforce the Board’s order.

in Re Deutsche Bank Ag, Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. D/B/A Deutsche Bank Alex. Brown, Inc., and David Parse

Texas Supreme Court · May 31, 2006

BROWN, INC., AND DAVID PARSE On Petition for Writ of Mandamus ORDERED: 1. … The proceedings in Cause No. 017-212033-05, styled Henry Camferdam, et al. v.

Dallas County v. Dallas National Bank

142 Tex. 439 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1944

J. 856; Johnson *442 v. Holland, 17 Texas. Civ. App. 210, 43 S. W. 71 (writ refused); Simkins v. City of Corsicana, Texas Civ. App., 86 S. W. (2d) 792 . … Schoonover v. Stewart et al, State Board of Equalization, 89 Mont. 257 , 297 Pac. 476 , par. 14; People ex rel. Two Lakes Corporation et al v. Mathews et al (N. Y.), 272 N. Y. S. 649, par. 2.

Pich v. Lankford

157 Tex. 335 · Texas Supreme Court · May 15, 1957

Brown * * *. Though it was not shown that *341 the lot had in fact been conveyed to William H. … Gibson v.

McLarty v. Bolton

144 Tex. 490 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1946

McLarty, Jr., has filed in this Court a motion for leave to file an original petition for mandamus against the Dean and the Board of Directors of the Texas Agricultural and Mechanical College, compelling them to permit relator … See also Betts v. Johnson, 96 Texas 360 , 73 S. W. 4 ; McFall v. State Board of Education, 101 Tex. 572 , 110 S. W. 739 . The motion for leave to file the petition is therefore overruled.

Combes v. Stringer

106 Tex. 427 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1914

and husband, Edmund Brown, to H. … Whitehead v. Foley, 28 Texas, 268 ; Evitts v. Roth, 61 Texas, 81 , and authorities therein cited; Parker v. Baines, 65 Texas, 605 .

Annette S. Muecke v. Sue M. Hall

Texas Supreme Court · Mar 25, 2004

Thornton Summers Biechlin Dunham & Brown, L.C. 10100 Reunion Place, Suite 300 San Antonio, TX 78216-4186 RE: Case Number: 03-1137 Court of Appeals Number: 04-03-00348-CV Trial Court Number: 1998-CI-12338 … MUECKE v. SUE M. HALL Dear Counsel: Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued the enclosed order in the above referenced-cause.

Robinson v. Stuart

73 Tex. 267 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1889

Johnson v. Brown, 51 Texas, 80 ; Kennedy v. Upshaw, 66 Texas, 450 . The latter was the principal beneficiary under the will. … Danzey v. Swinney, 7 Texas, 617 ; Moore v. Hardison, 10 Texas, 467 ; Francis v. Williams, 14 Texas, 158 . But on the other hand it is held in Brown v.

AM. GEN. FIRE & CAS., CO. v. Vandewater

907 S.W.2d 491 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1995

Eady, Brown McCarroll & Oaks Hartline, Austin, for petitioner. Mark L. Kincaid, Law Office of Mark Kincaid, Austin, J. … Browning v. Placke, 698 S.W.2d 362, 363 (Tex.1985). The court of appeals correctly observes that Texas courts have been solicitous about reviewing service upon minors. See e.g. Wright v.

Ammex Warehouse Company v. Archer

7 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 589 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1964

Texas Liquor Control Board v. Jones, District Judge, supra. In so doing the Court relied primarily upon its prior decision rendered in Railroad Commission of Texas v. … In Texas Liquor Control Board v. Jones, Tex.Civ.App., 378 S.W.2d 898 , supra, the Court stated that the holding in City of Athens v.

in Re Deb Shafto, Herb Gonzales, Jr., Edward Lindsay, Art Browning, Christine Morshedi and the Green Party of Texas

Texas Supreme Court · Jul 2, 2010

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS No. 10-0487 IN RE DEB SHAFTO, HERB GONZALES, JR., EDWARD LINDSAY, ART BROWNING, CHRISTINE MORSHEDI AND THE GREEN PARTY OF TEXAS … Richie, in his capacity as Chairman of the Texas Democratic Party; and John Warren, in his capacity as Democratic Nominee for Dallas County Clerk v.

Markham v. Houston Direct Navigation Co.

73 Tex. 247 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1889

In the case of Cuddy v. … Beasley, Chief Justice, says: “The doctrine of the English case (Thorngood v.

McArthur v. Henry

35 Tex. 801 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1869

(Brown v. Caldwell, 10 Serg. and R., 114). As observed by Judge Wheeler in George v. Thomas, 16 Texas, 89 , “It is beneficial to all concerned, as well married women, minors, and others.” … (George v. Thomas, 16 Texas, 84 ; Houston v. Sneed, 15 Texas, 309 ; Singleton v. Whitesides, 5 Yerger, 34; Ross v. Turner, 5 Yerger, 338; Goodrich v. Dustin, 5 Metcalf, 363; Adams v.

Upham v. White

25 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 237 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1982

The United States District Court adopted for its temporary emergency plan the Legislative Redistricting Board’s Plan. … See Wise v. Lipscomb, 437 U.S. 535 , 98 S.Ct. 2493 , 57 L.Ed.2d 411 (1978).

Weaver v. Shaw

5 Tex. 286 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1849

. — Martel v. Hernslieim, 9 T., 294; Armstrong v. Nixon, 16 T., 610; Brown v. Torrey, 22 T., 54; Moke & Bro. v. Brackett, 28 T., 443; Hollingsworth v. Bagley,35 T.,345; Pullen v. Baker, 41 T., 419. … Alexander, 21 T.,154; Thouvenin v. Rodrigues, 24 T., 468.) Judgment affirmed.

Dulin v. Moore

96 Tex. 135 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1902

A similar question was presented in the case of McMurry v. Stanley, 69 Texas, 227 . … In the case of Potter v. Couch, 141 U.

Royal Globe Insurance Co. v. Bar Consultants, Inc.

22 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 219 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1979

Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Walker, supra; State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Matlock, supra; International Security Life Ins. Co. v. Finck, supra; Great American Casualty Co. v. … Co. v. Finck, supra.