Case law

Carey v. Looney

113 Tex. 93 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1923

The action of the Supreme Court in granting the writ in Brown v. Fleming and refusing the writ in Thallman v. … That case and Brown v. Fleming and Matthews v. Eyers are directly in conflict with McCargo v. Smith, Kinsey v. Spurlin, and Long v.

Neagle v. Nelson

28 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 215 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1985

Phillip Brown, Amarillo, for petitioner. Paul M. Green, San Antonio, James H. Robichaux and Ben A. Donnell, Corpus Christi, for respondents. WALLACE, Justice. … Board of Ins. Comm'rs v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 142 Tex. 630 , 180 S.W.2d 906, 909 (1944). For this reason, I view the "discovery rule" issue as an open question, and remain amenable to persuasion.

in Re Kuraray America, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court · Dec 9, 2022

Id. at 223-24 (quoting Texaco, Inc. v. Sanderson, 898 S.W.2d 813, 815 (Tex. 1995)). … Lozano v.

Miner v. Paris Exchange Bank

53 Tex. 559 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1880

Mills v. Johnson, 23 Tex., 329 . 2. Compound interest is not of itself usurious. Mills v. Johnson, 23 Tex., 329 ; Lewis v. Paschal, 37 Tex., 318 ; Mills v. Bales, 11 Conn., 495 ; Turner v. Miller, 1 Eng. … (Ark.), 468; Wilcox v. Howland, 3 Pick., 169 ; Brown v. Brent, 1 Hen. & M. (Va.), 4. It is the usual practice with us to render judgment for the principal and interest then due, and this new principal to bear interest.

Fleming v. Giboney

81 Tex. 422 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1891

Chandler v. Tarbox, 27 Texas, 144 . That, however, does not determine the issue under the circumstances, but* the question of identity still remains to be solved by the other facts pertinent to the inquiry. … Burkett v. Scarborough, 59 Texas, 498 , and authorities cited; McPhail v. Burris, 42 Texas, 142 . The date of the proof as made before the board of commissioners by the applicant for the .certificate is not given.

Alpha Petroleum Co. v. Terrell

122 Tex. 257 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1933

In Galpin v. … In Morse v.

McLendon v. City of Houston

153 Tex. 318 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1954

In Jones v. City of Fort Worth, Texas Com. App., 267 S.W. 681 , the City Charter required that notice in writing be served upon the Board of Commissioners. … Cunningham v. Cunningham, 120 Texas 491 , 40 S.W. 2d 46 , 75 A.L.R. 1305 ; Cruzan v. Walker, 119 Texas 189 , 26 S.W. 2d 908 ,; Arrowood v.

Love v. City of Dallas

120 Tex. 351 · Texas Supreme Court · May 16, 1931

Board of Commrs., 44 Ind., 524 ; Skinkle v. Essex Road Board, 47 N. J. L., 93; Town of Milwaukee v. City of Milwaukee, 12 Wis., 93 ; Essex Public Road Board v. Skinkle, 140 U. S., 334 , 11 S. Ct., 790 , 35 L. … Rep., 103 ; Board of Park Commrs. v. Common Council, 28 Mich., 228 , 15 Am. Rep., 202 ; Spauling v. Andover, 54 N. H., 38; Trustees of Aberdeen Female Academy v.

Second Injury Fund v. Keaton

162 Tex. 250 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1961

While it is true, as was held in the case of Miears v. … Johnson v. Darr, 114 Tex. 516 , 272 S.W. 1098 . *255 We have found no Texas case involving the exact question presented here.

Dynegy Inc. v. Terry W. Yates, Individually, and Terry W. Yates, P.C.

Texas Supreme Court · Aug 30, 2013

As we explained in Bank of Garvin v. … (emphasis added). 3 Cooper Petroleum Co. v.

Lewis v. Alexander

51 Tex. 578 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1879

(De Leon v. Trevino, 49 Tex., 88 ; Boggess v. Lilly, 18 Tex., 200 ; Mills v. Johnston, 23 Tex., 308 ; Brooks v. Martin, 2 Wall., 70 ; Planters’ Bank v. Union Bank, 16 Wall., 483 ; Sharp v. Taylor, 2 Phil. Ch., 801.) … (Mathews v. Rucker, 41 Tex., 636 ; Short v. Abernathy, 42 Tex., 94 ; Sau Patricio Co. v. McClane, 44 Tex., 392 ; Roller v. Wooldridge, 46 Tex., 485 ; Rodgers v. Bass, 46 Tex., 505 ; Edmonds v.

State v. Giles

368 S.W.2d 943 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1963

Pearson v. State (1958), 159 Tex. 66 , 315 S.W.2d 935 ; Lower Nueces River Water Supply Dist. v. Cartwright (1959), 160 Tex. 239 , 328 S.W.2d 752, 753, 754 ; McInnis v. Brown County Water Improvement Dist. … Co. v. Ft. Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. (1894), 86 Tex. 537 , 26 S.W. 54 , Ft. Worth Railway filed a petition with the County Judge of Brown County to condemn land enabling Ft.

General Electric Credit Corporation v. Midland Central Appraisal District

826 S.W.2d 124 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1992

See, e.g., Webb County Appraisal Dist. v. New Laredo Hotel, 792 S.W.2d 952, 954 (Tex.1990); Dallas County Appraisal Dist. v. Lal, 701 S.W.2d 44, 46 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1985, writ ref’d n.r.e.). … Review Board of Freestone County, Midland County and Freestone County. 2 .

Gunter & Munson v. Meade & Bomar

78 Tex. 634 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1890

County, but that a colonial grant for one league of laud was made to Donato Leona by the government in 1835, which was situated in Angelina County; but that that board did issue to the assignees of Leona a certificate for … Winsor v. O’Connor, 69 Texas, 571 , and cases cited; Adams v. Railway, 70 Texas, 252 . *638 The court below, however, seems to have held that the land was equitably owned by Mrs. Purinton or those claiming through her.

In Re Allison

52 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 984 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 26, 2009

The evidentiary panel’s judgment may be appealed to the Board of Disciplinary Appeals, and the Board of Disciplinary Appeals’ judgment is appealable to this Court. Id. at 2.24, 2.28. … Both parties rely on the Board of Disciplinary Appeals’ decision in Cafiero v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Bd. of Disciplinary Appeals Case No. 37811 (Mar. 23, 2007).

Texas Employers Insurance v. Guidry

128 Tex. 433 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1937

He gave timely notice of the injury and on February 27, 1926, filed claim for compensation with the Industrial Accident Board. … In the case of Holloway v. Texas Indemnity Insurance Company, (Com. App.), 40 S.

Hines v. Baker

112 Tex. 484 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1923

Co. v. Rowland, 70 Texas, 298 , 7 S. … Railway v. Chenault, 92 Texas, 501 .”

Castleman v. Pouton

51 Tex. 84 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1879

(Booth v. Upshur, 26 Tex., 71 ; Booth v. Strippleman, 26 Tex., 441 ; Burnett v. Burriss, 39 Tex., 502 ; Browning v. Atkinson, 37 Tex., 659 ; Jones v. Burgett, 46 Tex., 292 .)

National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. Dominguez

873 S.W.2d 373 · Texas Supreme Court · May 11, 1994

Garza v. Alviar, 395 S.W.2d 821, 823 (Tex.1965). … Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc., 650 S.W.2d 61, 62-63 (Tex.1983).

Durrill v. Robison

138 S.W. 107 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1911

BROWN, C. J. It appears from the judgment of the district court of Travis county, purporting to remove the disabilities' of relator, that she was not a resident of the county of Travis within the meaning of the statute. … Cunningham v. Robison, 136 S. W. 441 . Being a minor, the relator is not qualified to purchase the land. It is therefore ordered that the motion be overruled, at the cost of the relator.