Case law

Joske v. Irvine

91 Tex. 574 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1898

The Supreme Court of the United States have approved the rule announced in Ryder v. Wombwell, supra. Improvement Co. v. Munson, 14 Wall., 442 ; Board of County Com. v. Clark, 4 Otto, 278 ; Griggs v. … Mullen v. Brown, 138 Mass., 114 . Would the mere fact that Shely made the arrest immediately after leaving Joske, warrant the conclusion that the latter “requested or directed” him to make it? We think not.

Mercer v. Hardy

12 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 542 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1969

See City of Beaumont v. Graham, 441 S.W.2d 829 (Tex.Sup.1969); Ohio Oil Co. v. Smith, 365 S.W.2d 621 (Tex.Sup.1963); Brown & Root, Inc. v. … See City of Beaumont v. Graham, 441 S.W.2d 829 (Tex.Sup.1969); Ohio Oil Co. v. Smith, 365 S.W.2d 621 (Tex.Sup.1963); Brown & Root, Inc. v.

Jennings, Gary Don

Texas Supreme Court · Dec 16, 2015

Due Process cont: The case citing of;:Brown v. Estell at 712 F.Zd 1003; which is quite analogous with the previous case in Bonitto v. Bureu of Inn)g; however, reminiscent of the Petitioner' s herein challenge: . . . … S. v.

Thomas R. Wright v. PlainsCapital Bank

Texas Supreme Court · Nov 17, 2015

WRIGHT, Appellant V. … PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Brown. 2

Ashley v. Usher

384 S.W.2d 696 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 11, 1964

Brackenridge v. Roberts, 114 Tex. 418 , 267 S.W. 244 , 270 S.W. 1001 (1925); May v. Brown, 144 Tex. 350 , 190 S.W.2d 715 (5), 165 A.L.R. 1180 (1945); McElroy v. … Cited as sustaining this proposition are cases from North Carolina, Utah, Virginia and the English case of Phipps v. Anglesey, 7 Brown’s Cas. in Par. 443. This last case is the first recorded authority on this point.

Hurt v. Cooper

130 Tex. 433 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1937

Hoefling v. City of San Antonio, 85 Texas 228 , 20 S. W. 85 , 16 L. R. A. 608; Brown v. City of Galveston, 97 Texas 1 , 75 S. W. 488 ; City of Fort Worth v. Gulf Refining Co., 125 Texas 512 , 83 S. … W. (2d) 610 ; Royal v. Virginia, 116 U. S. 577 , 6 Sup. Ct. 510, 29 L. Ed. 735 ; Dayton-Goose Creek Ry. Co. v. United States, 287 Fed. 728 ; Texas Co. v. Brown, 266 Fed. 577 , 37 C. J., p. 169, Sec. 6.

Plumb v. Stuessy

617 S.W.2d 667 · Texas Supreme Court · May 27, 1981

Poth v. Roosth, 146 Tex. 7 , 202 S.W.2d 442 (1947); Rocha v. Campos, 574 S.W.2d 233 (Tex.Civ.App.—Corpus Christi 1978, no writ); Brown v. Eubank, 378 S.W.2d 707 (Tex.Civ.App.—Tyler 1964, writ ref’d n. r. e.). … Greenlee v. Taylor, 79 Tex. 149 , 14 S.W. 1056 (1890); Stringfellow v. Brown, 326 S.W.2d 1 (Tex.Civ. App.—Fort Worth 1959, no writ).

Robert W. Van Boven M.D., D.D.S. v. Scott Freshour, Margaret McNeese, Chris Palazola, Amy Swanholm, Timothy Webb, and Sherif Zaafran, M.D., in Their Official Capacities as Officers of the Texas Medical Board

Texas Supreme Court · Jun 3, 2022

Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co., 84 S.W.3d 198, 204 (Tex. 2002) (citing Walling v. Metcalfe, 863 S.W.2d 56, 57 (Tex. 1993); Sun Oil Co. v. Whitaker, 424 S.W.2d 216, 218 (Tex. 1968)). … v.

in Re Dallas County, Texas

Texas Supreme Court · Jul 24, 2009

All trial court proceedings in Cause No. 236-231665-08, styled Dee Brown, Inc. v. Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. v.

Lion Fire Insurance Co. of London v. Wicker

93 Tex. 397 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1900

BROWN, Associate Justice. … All other questions are determined against plaintiff in error in our opinion filed this day in the case of Insurance Company of Forth America v. W. D. Wicker. The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is affirmed.

Willis v. Potts

377 S.W.2d 622 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1964

v. … He cites the Wyoming case of Baker v. Board of Commissioners of Crook County (1900) 9 Wyo. 51 , 59 P. 797 , and the case of State ex rel. Platt v. Kirk, 44 Ind. 401 , as so holding. The case of Baker v.

Steven Wayne Simmons v. State

Texas Supreme Court · Mar 27, 2018

gayle.humpa@5th.txcourts.gov LANA MYERS Court of Appeals DAVID EVANS FACSIMILE ADA BROWN … Mulberry Kaufman, TX 75142 STATUS INQUIRY RE: Court of Appeals Number: 05-17-00786-CR Trial Court Case Number: 16-90142-422-F Style: Steven Wayne Simmons v.

City of El Paso v. Ruckman

92 Tex. 86 · Texas Supreme Court · May 30, 1898

Fuller, 96 Mo., 165 ; Worley v. Harris, 82 Ind., 493 ; State v. Carr, 5 N. H., 367; State v. Wainwright, 50 N. J. Law, 555; Mendenhall v. Burton, 42 Kan., 570 ; Austrian v. Guy, 21 Fed. Rep., 500. … In the case of Graham v.

Winters v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co.

33 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 689 · Texas Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1990

Palmer v. Brown, 242 Kan. 893 , 752 P.2d 685, 686 (1988). The same cause of action was approved in Sheets v. … . §§ 378-61-378-69 (1988); Palmateer v. International Harvester Co., 85 Ill.2d 124 , 52 Ill.Dec. 13 , 421 N.E.2d 876 (1981); Palmer v. Brown, 242 Kan. 893 , 752 P.2d 685 (1988); Brown v. Physicians Mut. Ins.

Warnell v. Finch

15 Tex. 163 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1855

There can be no doubt that the certificate, granted by the Board of Land Commissioners, to the heirs of Henry Warnell, was valid; it had been granted by the Board authorized to act upon claims of headrights for land ; it … (See Styles v. Gray, 10 Tex. R. 506.) The patent to the heirs is conclusive in their favor, in the absence of proof of fraud; and the only question is the heirship of the plaintiff.

Secrest v. Jones

21 Tex. 121 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1858

(Browning v. Estis, 11 Tex. R. 237, and cases cited.) The Court therefore erred in the charge to the jury, that the effect of the instrument of the 24th of April, 1834, was that of an absolute deed or conveyance. … the proper county before another trial. *133 The instrument of the 24th of April, 1834, from Wright to Fitchett must be held to have been properly admitted to record under the decision of this Court in the case of Paschal v.

Delta Air Lines, Inc. and Al Perez v. Robert C. Black

Texas Supreme Court · Sep 11, 2003

See, e.g. , Smith v. Comair, Inc ., 134 F.3d 254, 257 (4th Cir. 1998); Boon Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Am. Airlines, Inc ., 17 S.W.3d 52, 58-59 (Tex. App.—Austin 2000, pet. denied); Howell v. … See, e.g. , Buckman Co. v. Plaintiff’s Legal Comm. , 531 U.S. 341, 351 (2001); San Diego Bldg. Trades Council v.

James v. Vernon Calhoun Packing Company

16 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 440 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1973

If so, the supervision of the Accident Board, at least, does no harm. To those who do need it, the supervision is exceedingly valuable. … See Marmon v. Mustang Aviation, Inc., Tex.Sup., 430 S.W.2d 182 ; Moss v. Gibbs, Tex.Sup., 370 S.W.2d 452 ; Rowe v.

San Antonio Union Junior College District v. Daniel

146 Tex. 241 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1947

It shall be the duty of such board to order such election, and the same shall be conducted and the returns made to such board. … When Art. 752, V. A. C.

Southern Underwriters v. Tulos

136 Tex. 408 · Texas Supreme Court · May 28, 1941

by verified pleadings: “(1) Notice of injury; “(2) Claim for compensation; “(3) Award of the board; “(4) Notice of intention not to abide by the award of the board; “ (5) Filing of suit to set aside the ward. … Southern Underwriters v. Jordan, 122 S. W. (2d) 260, 261 ; Traders & General Insurance Co. v. Porter, 124 S. W. (2d) 900, 902 (writ refused); Texas Indemnity Co. v. Briggs, 128 S. W. (2d) 861 (writ dismissed).