Case law

Sanborn v. Murphy

86 Tex. 437 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1894

Brown on Stat. of Frauds, sec. 59; Reed on Stat. of Frauds, sec. 782; Dial v. Crain, 10 Texas, 444 ; Galbreath v. Templeton, 20 Texas, 45 ; Van Hook v. Simmons, 25 Texas Supp., 323. … Brown on Stat. of Frauds, sec. 60; Reed on Stat. of Frauds, sec. 783; Faulk v. Burns, 1 Green Ch., 252; Bank v. Eastman, 44 N. H., 438. In the case of Galbreath v.

Van Independent School District v. Scott A. McCarty

Texas Supreme Court · May 27, 2005

In Schroeder v. … The deadline was rather a local administrative requirement that the Board could waive. See, e.g. , Grigsby v. Moses , 31 S.W.3d 747, 750 (Tex. App. B Austin 2000, no pet.)

Wells v. Davis

77 Tex. 636 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1890

In the case of Ann Berta Lodge v. … Eason v. Eason, 61 Texas, 227 ; Wooldridge v. Hancock, 70 Texas, 18 ; Bradley v. Owsley, 74 Texas, 69 .

Dallas General Drivers, Warehouse & Helpers, Local Union No. 745 v. Houston & North Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc.

151 Tex. 24 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1952

The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court because the order of *29 the National Labor Relations Board had not been affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. … , in Cause No. 13457, National Labor Relations Board v.

Memorial Hospital-The Woodlands v. McCown

39 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1021 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1996

See Shelton v. … In Jordan v.

Ex Parte Mitchell

109 Tex. 11 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1915

We largely rest our decision as to the first question upon State v. … That decision has never been overturned, and is the law upon the question; The second question is.equally well settled, according to our view, by Brown Cracker & Candy Co. v. The City of Dallas, 104 Texas, 290 , 137 S.

Price v. Houston Direct Navigation Co.

46 Tex. 535 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1877

(Hutchinson v. Railway Co., 5 Exch., 343; Priestley v. Fowler, 3 Mees. & Wel., 1; Barton’s Hill Coal Co. v. Reed, 3 Macy T. & S., 266; Brown v. Cotton Co., 3 H. & N., 511; Walker v. Bolling, 22 Ala., 294 ; Cook v. … St., 384; Frazier v. Penn. R. R. Co., 38 Penn., St., 104; Caldwell v. Brown, 53 Penn. St., 453; Weger v. Penn. R. R. Co., 55 Penn. St., 460; 59 Penn. St., 239; 61 Penn. St., 58; Ardes County Coal Oil Co. v.

Rudder v. Ponder

156 Tex. 185 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1956

The case of Hosner v. … As said in the case of Barney v.

Burk v. County of Galveston

76 Tex. 267 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1890

Simons v. County of Jackson, 63 Texas, 428 ; Kempner v. Galveston County, 73 Texas, 216 . … This objection is not tenable, as was decided by this court in the case of Kempner v.

Texas Turnpike Authority v. City of Fort Worth

20 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 492 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1977

Auth. v. City of San Marcos, 523 S.W.2d 641 (Tex.1975). … It is true that the Board of Directors as late as May 2, 1975, resolved to make no more capital improvements and to transfer the Turnpike when the existing bonded indebtedness was paid.

Southern Crushed Concrete, Llc v. City of Houston

56 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 295 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 15, 2013

River Auth. v. City of San Marcos, 523 S.W.2d 641, 643 (Tex. 1975) (citing Forwood v. City of Taylor, 214 S.W.2d 282 (Tex. 1948)). … not actually that.” __ S.W.3d __ (Brown, J., dissenting).

Lacholia v. Texas Employers Insurance

140 Tex. 231 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1942

The only exception provided is that, in case of partial incapacity or temporary total incapacity it is not necessary that the minor be represented before the board by a guardian or next friend, but the board itself may perform … For good cause the board may, in meritorious cases, waive the strict compliance with the foregoing limitations as to notice, and the filing the claim before the board. Acts 1917, p. 269.” (Italics ours.)

International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Welch

86 Tex. 203 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1893

BROWN, Associate Justice. Appellee sued appellant in the District Court to recover damages for an injury alleged to have been received while riding upon appellant’s passenger train as a passenger. … Reigle, 11 Gratt., 709 ; Hall v. Steamboat Co., 13 Conn., 326 ; Derwort v. Loomer, 21 Conn., 253 ; Fuller v. Tolbert, 23 Ill., 361 ; O’Connel v. Railway, 106 Mo., 482 ; Treadwell v. Wittier, 80 Cal., 574 ; Tenn. Co. v.

Lambeth v. McClinton

65 Tex. 108 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1885

Black v. Sweeney, 63 Tex., 425 . The three special charges requested by appellant were properly refused. The case of Seeligson v. Brown 61 Tex., 182 , does not support the radical doctrine contained in these charges.

Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. Reyna

865 S.W.2d 925 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1994

See Robey v. Sun Record Co., 242 F.2d 684 (5th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 816 , 78 S.Ct. 20 , 2 L.Ed.2d 33 ; J.S. Brown Hardware Co. v. Indiana Stoveworks, 96 Tex. 453 , 73 S.W. 800 (1903); Raymond v. … Kindred v.

Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Wisenor

66 Tex. 674 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1886

In attempting to board the caboose after adjusting the switch, his foot slipped on the step and he fell. The wheel passed over his foot and crushed it. The night was dark. … The case of Railway Company v. Gilmore, 62 Tex., 391 , is precisely in point. See also Railway Company v. Faber, 63 Tex., 344 ; Cook v. Dennis, 61 Tex., 246 ; Andrews v. Smithwick, 20 Tex., 111 ; Austin v.

Crosby v. Lum

35 Tex. 41 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1872

Such a citation is not a sufficient compliance with Article 1431, Paschal’s Digest, as decided in the cases of Burleson v. Henderson, 4 Texas, 51 ; Anderson v. Brown, 16 Texas, 554 ; Battle v. … Eddy, 31 Texas, 369 , and Rogers v. Green, decided at the last term of this court, to support a judgment by default. The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Fleming v. Houston Lighting & Power Co.

135 Tex. 463 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1940

Another case, the opinion in which was written by Justice Brown is the case of City of Brownwood et al v. Brown Telegraph Telephone Co., 106 Tex. 114 , 157 S.W. 1163 . … Tel Co. v. City of Dallas, 174 S.W. 636 .

Watkins v. Huff

94 Tex. 631 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1901

Lacoste v. Duffy, 49 Texas, 767 ; Gordon v. State, 47 Texas, 208 ; Corporation v. Paulding, 4 Martin, N. S., 189; Ex Parte Mackey, 15 S. C., 322; Cristman v. Peck, 90 Ill., 150 ; Colvard v. Board of Commissioners, 95 N. … C., 515 ; State v. Archibald, 43 Minn., 328 ; State v. Board of Commissioners, 27 Fla., 438 ; Cutcomp v. Utt, 60 Iowa, 156 ; Williams v. Commissioners, 35 Me., 345.

Pruitt v. Glen Rose Independent School District Number One

126 Tex. 45 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1935

In Odem v. Sinton Ind. School District, 234 S. W., 1090 , one G. L. Cellum, city assessor and collector of the City of Sinton, was selected by the school board to assess and collect taxes for the school district. … In State v. Valentine, 198 S.