Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstennctapp

8,955 results

1.30s

  • Church v. Perales

    39 S.W.3d 149 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 22, 2000

    See Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn. 1997); Aghili v. Saadatnejadi, 958 S.W.2d 784, 787 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). Summary judgments do not enjoy a presumption of correctness on appeal. See Nelson v. … Cunningham, 493 So. 2d 999, 1001 (Fla. 1986); Cardio TVP Surgical Assocs. v. Gillis, 528 S.E.2d 785, 787 (Ga. 2000); Shahinaw v. Brown, 963 P.2d 1184, 1188 (Idaho 1998); Earl v. Ratliff, 998 S.W.2d 882, 891 (Tex. 1999).

    Cited 179 timesPublished
  • Scates v. Canvas Decoy Co.

    5 Tenn. App. 695 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 26, 1927

    Brown v. Sumner, 31 Vt. 671 . The editor of L.R.A. (N.S.) Vol. 33, p. 431, in the case of Clark v. Tennison has collated many valuable notes on the liability of a married woman for necessaries purchased by her. … Sup., 484; Feiner v. Boynton, 73 N.J.L. 136 , 62 Atl., 420 ; Miller v. Brown, 47 Mo. 504 , 4 Am. Rep., 345 ; Bear's Estate, 60 Pa. 430 ; Gerger v. Clark, 79 Pa. 340 ; Robinson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Southwind Residential Properties Association, Inc. v. Kelvin Ford

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 14, 2017

    Under a 1995 amendment to the CCRs (“1995 Amendment” or “Amended CCRs”), the properties in the subdivision are subject to the “Assessment of Annual Charge,” which is to be determined by the Board of Directors (“the Board” … In turn, Article III, Section 3.2 of the 1995 Amendment to the CCRs provides: For the purpose of providing funds for use as specified in Article V hereof, the Board shall, in each calendar year commencing with

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Estate of Floyd Edward Faulkner

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 31, 2025

    In re Est. of West, 729 S.W.2d at 678; Haven v. Wrinkle, 195 S.W.2d 787, 794 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1945); see also In re Est. of Brown, No. 01A01-9809-PB-00471, 1999 WL 802718, at *7 (Tenn. Ct. App. … See, e.g., Jennings v. Bridgeford, 403 S.W.2d 289, 290 (Tenn. 1966); Keasler v. Est. of Keasler, 973 S.W.2d 213, 221 (Tenn. Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sammye M. Brock v. Benjamin Garrison Brock

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 10, 2022

    Young v. Barrow, 130 S.W.3d 59, 63 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003); see also Franks v. Sykes, 600 S.W.3d 908, 911 (Tenn. 2020). … HMF Trust v. Bankers Trust Co., 827 S.W.2d 296, 299 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991); Brown v. Brown, 45 Tenn. App. 78, 95, 320 S.W.2d 721, 728 (1959). In re: Estate of Marks, 187 S.W.3d 21, 28 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Estate of John Acuff, Sr. v. Brenda O'Linger

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 10, 2000

    La. 2000); Brown v. Ames, 201 F.3d 654 (5th Cir. 2000). Having concluded that the “clear, cogent and convincing evidence” rule applies in this case, we now turn to the standard of review applicable on appeal. … Brown was not present at the execution of the deeds in issue. Mrs. Brown had settled before trial her own law suit against the Acuff estate relative to their business partnership for $1,500,000.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shofner v. Shofner

    232 S.W.3d 36 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 30, 2007

    King v. Pope, 91 S.W.3d 314, 318 (Tenn.2002); Johnson v. Johnson, 37 S.W.3d 892, 894 (Tenn.2001). … Orr v. Thomas, 585 S.W.2d 606, 607 (Tenn.1979); State v. Shelby County Bd. of Comm’rs, 656 S.W.2d 9 (Tenn.App.1983)); see also State v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 18 S.W.3d 186, 194 (Tenn.2000).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Stegall v. City of Chattanooga

    16 Tenn. App. 124 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 14, 1932

    We think it was the purpose of this Act to meet the holding in the case of Gill v. … Coyne v. Memphis, 10 Cates, 661 , 205 S. W., 343 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Tindell's Inc. v. Mary Ava Partin

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 28, 2000

    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Submitted on Briefs November 28, 2000 TINDELL'S, INCORPORATED v. … Wells v. Tennessee Board of Regents, 9 S.W.3d 779 (Tenn. 1999).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chambliss v. Stohler

    124 S.W.3d 116 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 30, 2003

    See Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn.1997); Cowden v. Sovran Bank/Central South, 816 S.W.2d 741, 744 (Tenn.1991). … In Harris v.

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • Hiller v. Hailey

    915 S.W.2d 800 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 14, 1995

    In Williams v. … A succinct statement of this rule appears in Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v.

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • Boyd v. Prime Focus, Inc.

    83 S.W.3d 761 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 5, 2001

    Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 18 S.W.3d 186, 191 (Tenn.2000). … Andrews v. Bible, 812 S.W.2d 284, 287 (Tenn.1991).

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Lile v. Glenn

    23 Tenn. App. 299 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 22, 1938

    In Mitchell v. … In Hobbs v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Keown v. Fiddler's Inn, d/b/a: Fiddler's Inn North

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 14, 1998

    Bradshaw v. … See McCall v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Knoxville v. Carlos Geovanny Ponce-Carpio

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 25, 2015

    The permit on its face states that “[t]his document must be displayed in a conspicuous place as proof that appropriate Beer Board action was taken granting a permit and a valid permit exists.” … V. CONCLUSION The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Insurance Ass'n v. Simpson

    155 S.W.3d 134 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 7, 2004

    When the terms of an insurance policy are clear, the courts must avoid favoring one party or the other, Brown v. Tenn. Auto. Ins. Co., 192 Tenn. 60, 63 , 237 S.W.2d 553, 554 (1951); Victoria Ins. Co. v. … Co. v. Rossman, 518 N.W.2d 333, 335 (Iowa 1994); Hartman v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 106 Mich.App. 731 , 308 N.W.2d 625, 630 (1981); Amco Ins. Co. v. Norton, 243 Neb. 444 , 500 N.W.2d 542, 547 (1993); Gredig v. Tenn.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Miller

    6 Tenn. App. 668 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 12, 1927

    It is admitted that before this time Norris had boarded at the Miller house; that this arrangement was brougjht about by Miller himself who says he did' not suspect improper relations between Norris and defendant until after … The case of Loving v. Loving, decided by the Court of Civil Appeals in 1924 is cited and relied on.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Zebedee Johnson v. Metro Gov't for Nashville Davidson County

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 26, 1999

    See Watts v. Civil Serv. Bd. for Columbia, 606 S.W.2d 274 (Tenn. 1980); Wheeler v. City of Memphis, 685 S.W.2d 4 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1984). … See Thandiwe v. Traughber, 909 S.W.2d 802, 804 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kelly D. Bush v. Commerce Union Bank D/B/A Reliant Bank

    523 S.W.3d 56 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 18, 2017

    Bush and Byron V. … Brown v. Tennessee Title Loans, Inc., 328 S.W.3d 850, 854 (Tenn. 2010); Highwoods Props., Inc. v. City of Memphis, 297 S.W.3d at 700.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Ledford v. Moskowitz

    742 S.W.2d 645 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 15, 1987

    In Searle v. … Accord, Searle v. Bryant, 713 S.W.2d. at 64-65 . In Sutphin v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.