Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
8,955 results
1.33s
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 15, 2009
(citing Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn. 1997)). … Planters Gin Co. v. Fed. Compress & Warehouse Co., Inc., 78 S.W.3d 885, 889-90 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002) (quoting Guiliano v. Cleo, Inc., 995 S.W.2d 88, 95 (Tenn. 1999)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedWalker v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.
568 S.W.2d 103 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 19, 1977
Brown, Chattanooga, for plaintiff-appellee. OPINION GODDARD, Judge. … Co. v.
Cited 27 timesPublishedFriedman v. Georgia Showcase Co.
27 Tenn. App. 574 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 15, 1944
Milan Milling, etc., Co. v. Gorten, 93 Tenn. 590 , 27 S.W. 971 , 26 L.R.A. 135 ; McCaskey Registering Co. v. Johnson, 8 Tenn. Civ. App. 311 and see Browning v. … Lawson v. Producers Refiners Corp., 157 Tenn. 455 , 459, 9 S.W.2d 1026 ; Tennessee Central Ry. Co. v. Zearing, 2 Tenn. App. 451 ; Ballow v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co., 12 Tenn. App. 348 ; Guardian Life Ins. Co. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedWilliam L. Downing v. Sherrie J. Downing
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 13, 2011
DOWNING v. SHERRIE J. DOWNING Appeal from the General Sessions Court for Sumner County No. 83GS2-2009-GS-2 Barry R. Brown, Judge No. … Wife worked during the entirety of the marriage at Lifeway Christian Resources (formerly the Baptist Sunday School Board) in Nashville.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDennis David Schuelke v. Brad Gudgeon
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 23, 2014
See Reid v. Reid, 388 S.W.3d 292, 295 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). … Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50 (Tenn. 1997). Mr. Schuelke filed a Motion for Summary Judgment1 on May 21, 2013, and he noticed the motion to be heard on June 24, 2013.
Cited 0 timesPublished599 S.W.2d 548 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 22, 1979
In Jones v. … In Branch v.
Cited 155 timesPublishedChristopher James Terrazzano v. Alecia Ann Terrazzano
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 26, 2019
Mercer v. Vanderbilt Univ., Inc., 134 S.W.3d 121, 131 (Tenn. 2004). Decisions pertaining to discovery are also subject to an abuse of discretion standard of review. … State v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 18 S.W.3d 186, 194 (Tenn. 2000); accord Taylor v. Fezell, 158 S.W.3d 352, 359 (Tenn. 2005).
Cited 0 timesPublishedHaren Construction Company, Inc. v. Olen Ford
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 19, 2024
Plaintiff explained that it had served as the prime contractor for Knoxville Utility Board’s (“KUB”) Fourth Creek WWTP Sodium Hypochlorite Conversion Project (“the project”). … Estate of Brown, 402 S.W.3d 193, 198 (Tenn. 2013) (citing Hughes v. New Life Dev.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 18, 2001
Raines v. Mercer, 165 Tenn. 415, 55 S.W.2d 263 (1932): Goodman v. Wilson, 129 Tenn. 464, 166 S.W. 752 (1914); Loveman & Co. v. Bayless, 128 Tenn. 307, 160 S.W. 841 (1913). … Rule 26, Strickland v. Strickland, Tenn. App. 1981, 618 S.W.2d 496. The issuance of a protective order limiting discovery lies within the sound discretion of the trial judge. Brown v. Brown, Tenn.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRodger Broadway v. Tennessee Department of Correction
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 7, 2025
The Trial Court upheld the Board’s decision. … Parks v. Mid-Atlantic Finance Co., Inc., 343 S.W.3d 792, 799 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 11, 1994
) -3- property classification issues are questions of fact, Mitts v. Mitts, 39 S.W.3d 142, 144-45 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000); Brown v. … Code A nn. § 36 -4-12 1(b)(1)(B ); Cohen v. Cohen, 937 S.W .2d 823, 832 -33 (Tenn. 199 6). -4- v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d at 168; Mahaffey v.
Cited 0 timesPublished132 S.W.3d 354 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 29, 2003
When Defendant returned to the country, he did nothing to appeal the Florida Board of Medicine findings. … See also Memphis Telephone Company v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 28, 2000
Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d 208 (Tenn. 1993). Summary judgment is only proper where there are no genuine issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Shadrick v. … McFadden v. State, 532 S.W.2d 944 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1975); Howell v. State, 569 S.W.2d 428 (Tenn. 1978).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 23, 1998
Cardillo v. Doubleday, 2nd Cir. 1975; 518 F.2d 638; Ray v. Time, Inc., (W.D. Tenn. 1976), 452 F.Supp. 618. … In Little Stores v. Isenberg, the plaintiff obtained a jury verdict for damages from a false allegation of shoplifting.
Cited 0 timesPublished9 Tenn. App. 151 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 3, 1927
In the case of Sears v. Board of Aldermen, (Mass.) 53 N. E. 138 , 43 L. R. A. 36, referred to approvingly in the case of Arnold v. … for same, the countersigned orders and his sworn delinquent tax list shall be his vouchers for same, and for which he shall have credit on his quarterly and annual settlements with the Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Robertson v. Johnson County Bank
18 Tenn. App. 232 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 26, 1934
The board of directors of the Johnson County Bank met at 7 o’clock next morning, May 19th, and passed a resolution declaring the bank insolvent. … Klepper v. Cox, 97 Tenn., 538 , 37 S. W., 284 , 34 L. R. A., 536, 56 Am. St. Rep., 823 ; Bruner v. First Nat. Bank, 97 Tenn., 540 , 37 S. W., 286 , 34 L. R. A., 532. It was held in Bruner v. First Nat.
Cited 1 timesPublishedLackey v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
26 Tenn. App. 564 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 13, 1943
McCampbell v. Thornburgh, 40 Tenn. (3 Head), 109; Shirley v. Keathy, 44 Tenn. (4 Cold.), 29; Hackett v. Brown, 49 Tenn. (2 Heisk.), 264; Bank v. Bowdre Bros., 92 Tenn. 723 , 23 S. W. 131 . … Wright v. Clements, 1820, 3 B. & Ald. 503, 5 E. C. L. 358, 106 Eng. Reprint 746; Wood v. Brown, 1815, 6 Taunt. 169, 1 Marsh. 522 , 1 E. C. L. 347, 128 Eng. Reprint 998; Cook v. Cox, 1814, 3 Maule & S. 110, 105 Eng.
Cited 10 timesPublishedDawn Noles Martin (Gorham) v. Matthew Kendall Martin
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 20, 2015
See Brown v. Heggie, 876 S.W.2d 98, 101 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1993); Buettner v. Buettner, 183 S.W.3d 354, 358 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005); State ex rel. Whitley v. Lewis, 244 S.W.3d 824, 829–30 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007); State ex rel. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMain Street Market, LLC v. Emily v. Weinberg
432 S.W.3d 329 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 31, 2013
Satterfield v. Breeding Insulation Co., 266 S.W.3d 347, 366 (Tenn. 2008). 33. The Court determines whether a duty exists by evaluating the risk involved. Biscan v. Brown, 160 S.W.3d 347, 366 (Tenn. 2008). … Biscan v. Brown, 160 S.W.3d 462, 479 (Tenn. 2005) (citing Burroughs, 118 S.W.3d at 329; Bain v. Wells, 936 S.W.2d 618, 625 (Tenn. 1997); Bradshaw, 854 S.W.2d at 870).
Cited 12 timesPublishedKentucky-Tennessee Clay Company v. Joe Huddleston, Commissioner of Revenue, State of Tennessee
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 18, 2001
The second case cited by Plaintiff is Williamson v. McClain, 147 Tenn. 491, 249 S.W. 811 (1923). In Williamson, the private act under attack delegated authority to the board of commissioners to levy a tax. Id. at 812. … Board of Education of Memphis City Schools v. Shelby County, 339 S.W. 2d 569, 575 (Tenn. 1960). The legislature was presumed to know that the general law and the private act at bar addressed the same subject matter.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna