Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstennctapp

8,955 results

1.28s

  • Carolyn Payne v. Maxine Bradley

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 26, 2021

    On appeal, the plaintiffs maintain that [the party] has standing to challenge the Board’s gun show ban. In their brief, they quote two sentences from Hayes [v. City of Memphis, No. … Gurley v. King, 183 S.W.3d 30, 41–42 (Tenn. Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wheeler v. Wheeler

    63 Tenn. App. 442 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 8, 1971

    Tibbals Flooring Co. v. Stanfill, 219 Tenn. 498 , 410 S.W.2d 892 (1967); Donaho v. Large, 25 Tenn.App. 433 , 158 S.W.2d 447 (1941); Todd v. Rhoane-Anderson Company, 35 Tenn.App. 687 , 251 S.W.2d 132 (1952). … Clardy v. Clardy, 23 Tenn.App. 608 , 136 S.W.2d 526 ; Hepburn v. Milwaukee Mechanics Ins. Co., 27 Tenn.App. 612 , 183 S.W.2d 772 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Minton v. Gobble

    42 Tenn. App. 475 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 29, 1957

    Maxwell v. Kirkpatrick, 22 Tenn. App. 21, 28 , 116 S. W. (2d) 340 ; Southern Coach Lines v. Haddock, 29 Tenn. App. 132, 136 , 194 S. W. (2d) 347 . … City of Nashville v. Brown, 25 Tenn. App. 340, 350 , 157 S. W. (2d) 612, 619 ; Ezell v. Post Sign Co., Inc., 30 Tenn. App. 256, 260 , 205 S. W. (2d) 13 ; Smith v. Sloan, 189 Tenn. 368, 377 , 225 S. W. (2d) 539 , 227 S.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In Re: David L. R.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 6, 2013

    Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 651 (1972); Hawk v. Hawk, 855 S.W.2d 573, 577 (Tenn. 1993). This right is superior to the claims of other persons and the government, yet it is not absolute. … State Dep’t. of Children’s Servs. v. S.M.D., 200 S.W.3d 184, 198 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jerry Rogers v. David Stanley Davis and Vanetta Davis

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 26, 2004

    The Rule in equity applicable here was set forth in Ridley and Wife v. … Accord: Hugaty v. Bennett, 568 S.W.2d 46, 264 Ark. 64 (1978).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • S.H. Robinson Co., Inc. v. Larue

    25 Tenn. App. 284 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 9, 1941

    The case of Schrieber v. Kane Service (U. S. District Court, N. O. … The ease of Brown v. Bailey, 177 Tenn., 185 , 147 S.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Centimark Corporation v. Maszera Company, LLC.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 18, 2014

    Co. v. Winters, 354 S.W.3d 287, 291 (Tenn. 2011) (citing ARC LifeMed, Inc. v. AMC-Tenn., Inc., 183 S.W.3d 1, 26 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005)). In Bowling v. Jones, 300 S.W.3d 288 (Tenn. Ct. … Holder v. Westgate Resorts, Ltd., 356 S.W.3d 373, 379 (Tenn. 2011) (quoting Tenn. R. Evid. 703). See State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Beaudreau v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.

    118 S.W.3d 700 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 29, 2003

    See Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn.1997); Cowden v. Sovran Bank/Central South, 816 S.W.2d 741, 744 (Tenn.1991). … See Robinson v. Omer, 952 S.W.2d at 426 ; Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d at 210-11 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Daniel B. Taylor v. Donal Campbell

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 11, 2001

    Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50 (Tenn. 1997). We must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, and we must resolve all reasonable inferences in the non-moving party’s favor. … Code Ann. § 41- 21-236(c)(3) (1997); Davis v. Campbell, 48 S.W.3d at 746; Brown v. Tenn. Dep’t of Corr., No. M1999-02519-COA-R3-CV, 2001 WL 177059, at *2 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 23, 2001), perm. app. denied (Tenn.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Estate of Velma Russell v. Knox County

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 28, 2001

    Brown, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the Appellant, The Estate of Velma Monroe Russell Wendell K. … Union Carbide Corp. v. Huddleston, 854 S.W.2d 87 (Tenn. 1993). The trial court’s conclusions of law, however, are not accorded the same deference. Campbell v. Florida Steel Corp., 919 S.W.2d 26 (Tenn. 1996).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • U.S. Life Title Insurance Co. of New York v. Department of Commerce & Insurance of Tennessee

    770 S.W.2d 537 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 23, 1988

    Board of Zoning Appeals, 3 Mass.App.Ct. 441 , 333 N.E.2d 210, 212 (1975); State ex rel. Peake v. Board of Educ. of S. Point Local School Dist., 44 Ohio St.2d 119 , 339 N.E.2d 249, 251 (1975). … Co. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • International Minerals & Chemical Corp. v. Crown Cattle Co.

    537 S.W.2d 926 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 27, 1974

    Section 27-119 and Murphy Truck Lines v. Brown, 203 Tenn. 414 , 313 S.W.2d 440 (1958); and Fitzsimmons v. Brock, 46 Tenn.App. 526 , 330 S.W. 563 (1958); Methodist Hospital v. Ball, 50 Tenn.App. 460 , 362 S.W.2d 475 . … Assignments of error IV and V are respectfully overruled. Assignment of error No. VI insists that His Honor the Trial Judge was in error in refusing to admit in evidence the memorandum from Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McWhorter v. Barre

    132 S.W.3d 354 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 29, 2003

    When Defendant returned to the country, he did nothing to appeal the Florida Board of Medicine findings. … See also Memphis Telephone Company v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Denise Kissick v. Edward Kallaher

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 18, 2006

    Brown, Judge No. W2004-02983-COA-R3-CV - Filed May 18, 2006 The juvenile court dismissed Mother’s dependency and neglect petition. … In Kelly v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carl Nelson v. Harold Eugene Martin & Jack W. Gammon - Concurring

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 1, 1996

    W & W Equipment Co., Inc. v. Mink, 568 N.E.2d at 570; Crosby v. Beam, 548 N.E.2d at 221. … However, both Gammon and Martin ratified the decision to discharge Nelson at the March 25, 1989, board meeting.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dana Looper v. City of Algood

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 16, 2018

    correctness as to the board’s finding. … App. 1972) (“[I]f upon an examination of the evidence before the board or commission, the court finds any material evidence to sustain the finding there made, the court must affirm the board or commission.”).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Linkscorp Tennessee Six, L.L.C.

    212 S.W.3d 293 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 28, 2006

    Blair v. West Town Mall, 130 S.W.3d 761, 764 (Tenn.2004). It is alleged in the Plaintiffs’ complaint that Mr. … Alga is described as "any of a group (Algae) of chiefly aquatic nonvascular plants (as seaweeds, pond scums, and stoneworts) with chlorophyll often masked by a brown or red pigment.”

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Robertson v. Johnson County Bank

    18 Tenn. App. 232 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 26, 1934

    The board of directors of the Johnson County Bank met at 7 o’clock next morning, May 19th, and passed a resolution declaring the bank insolvent. … Klepper v. Cox, 97 Tenn., 538 , 37 S. W., 284 , 34 L. R. A., 536, 56 Am. St. Rep., 823 ; Bruner v. First Nat. Bank, 97 Tenn., 540 , 37 S. W., 286 , 34 L. R. A., 532. It was held in Bruner v. First Nat.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ronald Whitford v. Village Groomer & Animal Inn, Inc.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 17, 2021

    Crabtree Masonry Co., Inc. v. C & R Constr., 575 S.W.2d 4, 5 (Tenn. 1978); see also Barnes v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 48 S.W.3d 698, 704-05 (Tenn. 2000), abrogated on other grounds by Gossett v. … Pate v. City of Martin, 614 S.W.2d 46, 48 (Tenn. 1981); see also Clabo v. Great Am. Resorts, Inc., 121 S.W.3d 668, 671 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Coker v. State Claims Comm

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 23, 1998

    Cardillo v. Doubleday, 2nd Cir. 1975; 518 F.2d 638; Ray v. Time, Inc., (W.D. Tenn. 1976), 452 F.Supp. 618. … In Little Stores v. Isenberg, the plaintiff obtained a jury verdict for damages from a false allegation of shoplifting.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.