Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstennctapp

8,955 results

1.40s

  • Judith Silvey v. Darrel Silvey

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 12, 2002

    Frank Brown, III., Chancellor FILED MARCH 22, 2002 No. … See Thompson v. Thompson, 797 S.W.2d 599, 604 (Tenn. Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wade v. Baybarz

    660 S.W.2d 493 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 4, 1983

    In reaching the foregoing conclusion we have considered Maddox v. Druid City Hospital Board, 357 So.2d 974 (Ala.1978), wherein the Supreme Court of Alabama, in applying the common law rule which counsel for Mr. … For the foregoing reasons the case of Wade v. Lay is affirmed and that of Wade v. Baybarz reversed. Both cases are re manded — Lay for collection of costs below and Baybarz for trial on the merits.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • City of Jackson v. Hoyel

    62 Tenn. App. 536 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 16, 1970

    Balsinger v. Town of Madisonville, 222 Tenn. 272 , 435 S.W.2d 803 ; State ex rel. Senff v. Columbia, 208 Tenn. 59 , 343 S.W.2d 888 . … Wilson v. Moudy, 22 Tenn.App. 356 , 123 S.W.2d 828 ; Rutherford v. Swink, 90 Tenn. 152 , 16 S.W. 76 . Assignment of error No. V is, therefore, respectfully overruled. Assignment of error No.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Claudia Henneberry and husband, Scott Henneberry v. John (Randy) Simoneaux and wife, Mrs. John (Randy) Simoneaux

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 22, 2006

    App. 2001); Newton v. Tinsley, 970 S.W.2d 490, 492 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997); see also Biscan v. Brown, 160 S.W.3d 462, 479 (Tenn. 2005) (citing § 315); Bradshaw, 854 S.W.2d at 871 (citing § 315); Nichols v. … West v. E. Tenn. Pioneer Oil Co., 172 S.W.3d 545, 554 (Tenn. 2005) (quoting Woodson v. Porter Brown Limestone Co., 916 S.W.2d 896, 907 (Tenn. 1996)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. a Quality, Inc.

    250 S.W.3d 860 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 9, 2007

    NSA DBA Benefit Plan v. Connecticut Gen. Life Ins. Co., 968 S.W.2d 791, 795 (Tenn.Ct.App.1997). In Gray v. … Paragraph 1) of the Lease, we know that the property being leased is the “sign boards on the Premises described in Exhibit A....” In Paragraph eleven (11), Mr.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jeanne L. Schuett v. Egon Horst Schuett, Jr.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 4, 2006

    v. … Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 169 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Linda K. Guthrie v. Rutherford County, Tennessee

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 15, 2016

    Brown v. Hamilton Cty., 126 S.W.3d 43, 46 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). … Well, the school board policy about teachers being in the hallway. *** Q. You are not blaming or faulting any of your faculty members for doing something wrong, are you?

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cardinal Health 108, Inc. v. East Tennessee Hematology-Oncology Associates, P.C.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 14, 2016

    Id. at 5; see Robinson v. Omer, 952 S.W.2d 423, 426 (Tenn. 1997); Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d 208, 215 (Tenn. 1993). … Luther v. Compton, 5 S.W.3d 635, 639 (Tenn. 1999); Muhlheim v. Knox. Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 2 S.W.3d 927, 929 (Tenn. 1999).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thomas M. Gautreaux v. Internal Medicine Education Foundation, Inc.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 30, 2009

    -8- In determining that the Board of Directors of Health Partners, Inc. … Toledo Blade Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Janet Wynn Snyder v. First Tennessee Bank, N.A.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 3, 2016

    Snyder‟s original complaint, her counsel, Menefee & Brown, Inc. … Brown, as counsel for Ms. Snyder and President of the Surety.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Philadelphia Life Ins. Co. v. Daugherty

    23 Tenn. App. 311 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 17, 1939

    Canton Cotton Mills v. Overall Co., 149 Tenn., 18 , 257 S. W., 398 ; Board of Ed. v. Board of Ed., 160 Tenn., 351 , 24 S. W. (2d), 889 . "We think this rule conclusive of the question under discussion. … In arriving at the conclusions we have reached in this case we have given careful consideration to authorities cited on behalf of plaintiff-in-error, especially the case of Cox v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc., 22 Tenn.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Teal Properties, Inc. v. Dog House Investments, LLC

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 15, 2018

    (quoting Brown v. Tenn. Title Loans, Inc., 328 S.W.3d 850, 854 (Tenn. 2010)). … (citing Brown, 328 S.W.3d at 855).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Roy Baines v. Wilson County

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 29, 1996

    In Anderson v. … In Williams v. Williamson County Bd. of Educ., this court held that individual members of a board of education could not be liable for retaliatory discharge. Williams, 890 S.W.2d at 790.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Charles A. Harmon v. James J.J. Jones

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 14, 2012

    McWhorter v. … In State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tim Burrus v. Jimmy Wiseman

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 26, 2009

    State v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 18 S.W.3d 186, 191 (Tenn. 2000). The denial of permissive intervention is reviewed only for abuse of discretion. Id. Tenn. R. Civ. … In Boarman v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jill St. John-Parker v. Virgil Duane Parker

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 17, 2016

    Our Supreme Court, in Mabry v. Board of Professional Responsibility of 5 Wife “vehemently denied” the allegations made by Husband in his Rule 60 motion. … State v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 18 S.W.3d 186, 194 (Tenn. 2000). In cases involving child support or custody, Tenn.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Clifford Taylor v. State

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 28, 2000

    Taylor sought to have his parole eligibility dates recalculated by the Parole Eligibility Review Board after passage of the Criminal Sentencing Reform Act of 1989. … The Board denied Mr. Taylor an amended release eligibility date, and this court affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of Mr. Taylor’s attempt to gain judicial review of that denial. Jeffries, et al. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Inman v. Jones Creek Drainage Dist. No. 10

    5 Tenn. App. 211 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 3, 1927

    It seems to.be conceded that the hearing of this ease upon the appeal will be governed by the rule announced in Beatty v. Schneck, 127 Tenn,, 663, 152 S. W., 103 , and Choate v. Sewell, 142 Tenn., 487 , 221 S. W., 190 . … of said District : “On this day we in company with the board of directors, have been over and carefully inspected Jones Creek canal, constructed by J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Frederick Todd Smith v. Jim Crossman

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 2, 2004

    State v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 18 S.W.3d 186, 194 (Tenn. 2000) (citing John Kohl & Co. v. Dearborn & Ewing, 977 S.W.2d 528, 534 (Tenn. 1998)). … Co. v. Gatlinburg, L.L.C., 9 S.W.3d 79, 85 (Tenn. 1999).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Oliver v. Williams

    19 Tenn. App. 54 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 30, 1935

    Brown v. Kencheloe, 3 Cold., 192 , 200; Smith v. Amusement Co., 128 Tenn., 112, 116 , 157 S. W., 900 ; Nashville Interurban Railway v. Gregory, 137 Tenn., 422 , 193 S. W., 1053 ; Byrd v. Crowder, 166 Tenn., 215 , 60 S. … Nashville Interurban Railway v. Gregory, supra, 137 Tenn., 422 , page 436, 193 S. W., 1053 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.