Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
8,955 results
1.57s
Savings, Building & Loan Ass'n v. McLain
18 Tenn. App. 292 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 25, 1934
Reports, 378, 379; Brown v. Brown, 107 Tenn., 349 , 65 S. W., 413 ; Lane v. Logue, 12 Lea, 681 , 685; Gregg v. Jones, 5 Heisk., 444 ; Bank of Tennessee v. Erwin, 2 Shan. Cas., 442 . … Robinson v. Owens, supra.
Cited 8 timesPublished61 Tenn. App. 666 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 17, 1969
A board of appraisers was named by the Board of Mayor and Aldermen to determine the value of the various parcels of land to be taken and the incidental damages, if any, resulting to the. property owners as a result of such … The writer of this opinion recalls that in the case of Rich Printing Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished40 Tenn. App. 416 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 15, 1954
In the case of Plantt v. Plantt, 28 Tenn. App. 79, 80 , 186 S. … Jackson v. Jackson, 25 Tenn. App. 198 , 154 S. W. (2d) 797 ; Perry v. Carter, 188 Tenn. 409 , 219 S. W. (2d) 905 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedS.L.C., b/n/f E.C. and M.C. and A.J.C. , b/n/f L.A.S. v. Alden Joe Daniel, Jr.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 20, 2008
V-01-267/V-01-301 Hon. Lawrence Puckett, Circuit Judge Filed March 20, 2008 No. … Brown v. Birman Managed Care, Inc., 42 S.W.3d 62, 66-67 (Tenn. 2001). There is nothing in this record to indicate that any type of fraud was perpetrated upon the defendant.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 20, 2000
In Jones v. … See Herrera v. Herrera, 944 S.W.2d 379, 390 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996); Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 170 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). Ms.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDarrell Smith v. Chattanooga Medical Investors, Inc. d/b/a Life Care Center Chattanooga
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 30, 2001
Frank Brown, III, Chancellor FILED JUNE 27, 2001 No. … The defendants argue that the decision in Fuzie v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCatina Hope Kestner Lusk v. Brandon Burl Lusk
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 22, 2024
App. 1991) (there was no evidence of bias based on the defendant’s filing a complaint with the board of judicial conduct); see also Moncier v. … See Sneed v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSylvester Young v. Leah Barrow
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 22, 2002
Brown v. City of Manchester, 722 S.W.2d 394, 397 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986); Usrey v. Lewis, 553 S.W.2d 612, 614 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1977). III. MR . … Richardson v. Tennessee Bd. of Dentistry, 913 S.W.2d 446, 459 (Tenn.1995); Brown v. Brown, 29 S.W.3d 491, 495 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000); Collins v. Greene County Bank, 916 S.W.2d 941, 945 (Tenn. Ct. App.1995).
Cited 0 timesPublishedChildress Ex Rel. Childress v. Madison County
777 S.W.2d 1 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 24, 1989
The trial court’s judgment in this case indicates that he found no negligence on the part of Madison County or the Madison County Board of Education. … Co. v. Saulsbury, 90 S.W. at 626.
Cited 24 timesPublished73 S.W.3d 95 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 10, 2001
In Byrd v. … He is board certified in obstetrics and gynecology. Dr.
Cited 22 timesPublished8 Tenn. App. 613 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 3, 1928
State ex rel. v. Bolt, 130 Tenn., 212, 218 , 169 S. W., 761 ; Oppenheimer v. Bank, 97 Tenn., 19, 23 , 36 S. W. 705 ; Wilson v. Scruggs, 7 Lea, 635 , 641; Parsons v. Kinzer, 3 Lea, 342 , 352; Grubb v. … V and XII; Wood v. Green, 131 Tenn., 583, 586 , 175 S. W., 1139 ; Gorrell v. Mayor etc., of Newport, 1 Tenn. Chy. App. R., 120, 133; Thompson v. Evans, 2 Tenn. Chy. App. R., 61, 66; Haire v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedRiver Links at Deer Creek, LLC v. Melz
108 S.W.3d 855 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 31, 2002
V. … He also demands to be reinstated to the board of the company.
Cited 9 timesPublished769 S.W.2d 497 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 25, 1989
Twin City Brief Printing Co. v. Review Publishing Co., 139 Minn. 358 , 166 N.W. 413, 415 (1918) (emphasis added). … In re Brown 150 N.E. at 583 . We find this distinction applicable to the instant case.
Cited 6 timesPublishedYona Boyd v. Donald Bruce, M.D.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 2, 2001
Brown v. Brown, 29 S.W.3d 491, 495 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). … Brown, 29 S.W.3d at 496 (quoting Hayes v. Civil Serv. Comm’n. of Metro. Gov’t, 907 S.W.2d 826, 828 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedHafeman v. PROTEIN DISCOVERY, INC.
344 S.W.3d 889 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 28, 2011
The CEO, joined by the Chairman of the Board, called the Employee at his home in California immediately after the board meeting to inform him of his termination. … Honeycutt v. Honeycutt, 152 S.W.3d 556, 561-62 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). As the Supreme Court explained in Ellis v. Pauline S.
Cited 3 timesPublishedChristy Keller Elrod Church v. Darrell Gene Elrod
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 25, 2019
See State v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 18 S.W.3d 186, 194 (Tenn. 2000). An award of appellate attorney fees is a matter that is within this Court’s sound discretion. Archer v. Archer, 907 S.W.2d 412, 419 (Tenn. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublished34 Tenn. App. 568 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 13, 1951
In Clark v. Clark, 152 Tenn. 431 , 278 S. … In Sullivan v. Sullivan, 23 Tenn. App. 644 , 137 S.
Cited 4 timesPublished907 S.W.2d 812 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 10, 1995
Home v. Cox, Tenn.1977, 551 S.W.2d 690 ; Ingraham v. Wright, 430 U.S. 651 , 97 S.Ct. 1401 , 51 L.Ed.2d 711 (1977); Parate v. … The defendants have sought dismissal because the plaintiff has a claim pending before the State Board of Claims.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMountain City Mill Co. v. Lindsey
8 Tenn. App. 337 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 15, 1928
Yancey v. Brown, 3 Sneed, 89 , 96; Bright v. McKnight, 1 Sneed, 158, 166 . (b) It is claimed on behalf of appellants that the guaranty was without consideration and therefore nonenforceable. We do not think so. … “In Paley v. Field, 12 Ves.
Cited 4 timesPublishedJohanna L. Gonsewski v. Craig W. Gonsewski
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 17, 2010
Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 168 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). … Brown, 913 S.W.2d at 169. Our legislature has stated a public policy preference for temporary, rehabilitative spousal support over long-term support. Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-121(d)(2); Herrera v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna