Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstennctapp

8,955 results

1.76s

  • Stacey Fair v. Clarksville Montgomery County School System

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 23, 2017

    The trial court thereafter remanded the matter for the Clarksville Montgomery County Board of Education (the “Board of Education”) for a hearing. … Knott v. Stewart County, 185 Tenn. at 626, 207 S.W.2d at 338–39; Bell v. Todd, 206 S.W.3d 86, 96 (Tenn.Ct.App.2005); Massengill v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mattie Bedford v. Margaret Culpepper

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 20, 1997

    However, in Southern Railway Co. v. … Weaver v. Wallace, 565 S.W.2d 867, 870 (Tenn. 1978). In addition, the employee must be at fault. McClellan v. Bible, 699 S.W.2d 555, 556 (Tenn. 1985). In Armstrong v. Neel, 725 S.W.2d 953 (Tenn.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mark T. Cross v. River Sound Homeowners Association, Incorporated

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 4, 2020

    Ingram, 379 S.W.3d at 238; Brown v. John Roebuck & Assocs., Inc., No. M2008–02619–COA–R3–CV, 2009 WL 4878621, at *5 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 16, 2009). … Carr v. Valinezhad, M2009–00634–COA–R3–CV, 2010 WL 1633467, at *3 (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 22, 2010) (quoting Brown, 2009 WL 4878621, at *6).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chattanooga Regional Transportation Authority v. Gerald D. Autry

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 23, 2002

    We copy from the Chancellor’s opinion the pertinent facts and the standard of review of the Board of Review’s decision which is the same standard we employ in reviewing the Trial Court’s determination. Ford v. … Frogge v. Davenport, 902 S.W.2d 920, 922 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995); Perryman v. Bible, 653 S.W.2d 424, 429 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983); Irvin v. Binkley, 577 S.W.2d 677, 678 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1978).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cary Melton v. City of Lakeland, Tennessee

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 5, 2019

    Campbell v. Florida Steel Corp., 919 S.W.2d 26, 35 (Tenn. 1996); Alliance for Native Am. Indian Rights in Tenn., Inc. v. Nicely, 182 S.W.3d 333, 338-39 (Tenn. Ct. … (quoting Dockery v. Dockery, 559 S.W.2d 952, 955 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1977)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. The Metropolitan Government Of Nashville And Davidson County, TN v. State of Tennessee

    534 S.W.3d 928 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 3, 2017

    In that case, Tennessee Small School Systems v. … Biggs, in turn, quoted Scopes v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Neva Jane Marcrum v. Thomas T. Marcrum, Sr.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 4, 2007

    Robertson v. Robertson, 76 S.W.3d 337, 341 (Tenn. 2002); Cohen v. Cohen, 937 S.W.2d 823, 832 (Tenn. 1996); Kinard v. Kinard, 986 S.W.2d 220, 230 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998); Word v. Word, 937 S.W.2d 931, 933 (Tenn. Ct. … King v. King, 986 S.W.2d 216, 219 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998); Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 168 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jerome Degans v. Tennessee Department of Corrections

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 8, 2012

    M2011-00176-COA-R3-CV - Filed February 8, 2012 Inmate filed petition seeking review of decision of prison disciplinary board. … The common law writ of certiorari is “the proper procedural vehicle through which prisoners may seek review of decision by prison disciplinary boards. . . .” Willis v. Tenn.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jamie Randolph, on behalf of her mother, Carolyn Randolph v. Gianfranco Meduri, M.D.

    416 S.W.3d 378 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 2, 2011

    Biscan v. Brown, 160 S.W.3d 462, 468 (Tenn. 2005) (citing Mercer v. Vanderbilt Univ., Inc., 134 S.W.3d 121, 131 (Tenn. 2004)). … Judgments awarded beyond the scope of the pleadings are void.5 Brown v. Brown, 281 S.W.2d 492, 497 (Tenn. 1955) (citations omitted).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Smith v. St. Louis Mutual Life Insurance

    2 Tenn. Ch. R. 656 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 15, 1876

    In Gardner v. Brown, 21 Wall. 36 , the application for removal was under this statute. … This language of the chief justice, in Gardner v. Brown, is equally applicable here.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Armstrong v. Tennessee Department of Veterans Affairs

    959 S.W.2d 595 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 2, 1997

    Rowe v. Board of Educ. of Chattanooga, 938 S.W.2d 351, 354 (Tenn. 1996), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 1271 (1997) (citing Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569-70, 92 S. Ct. 2701, 2705, 33 L. … Lee v. Ladd, 834 S.W.2d 323, 325 (Tenn. App. 1992) (quoting Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. 327, 331, 106 S. Ct. 662, 665, 88 L. Ed. 2d 662, 668 (1986)).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Johnston v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County

    320 S.W.3d 299 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 10, 2009

    Upon returning to Tennessee, the board members discussed the clustering issue at the regularly scheduled meeting of the school board. Id. … Citing Fallin v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Cooper v. Queen

    586 S.W.2d 830 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 30, 1979

    In Brown Shoe Co. v. … Clement v. Nichols, 186 Tenn. 235 , 209 S.W.2d 23 (1948). Only in rare cases will an amendment be allowed in the appellate court. Tennessee Cent. R. Co. v. Brown, 125 Tenn. 351 , 143 S.W. 1129 (1911).

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Joseph Lee v. Anderson County Election Commission

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 31, 2007

    Browning v. Gray, 137 Tenn. 70, 191 S.W. 525, 526 (Tenn. 1916) (citing Barry v. Lauck, supra, 45 Tenn. at 593). Toward that end, the Browning court quoted Barry v. Lauck, as follows: "... … Browning, 137 Tenn. at 73, 191 S.W. 525.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Muirhead v. Muirhead

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 22, 2001

    See Bah v. Bah, 668 S.W.2d 663, 665-666 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983). … See Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 169 (Tenn.Ct.App. 1994); See also Ingram v. Ingram., 721 S.W.2d 262, 264 (Tenn.Ct.App. 1986). In the present case, the trial court’s award is not supported by the evidence.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wheeler v. Tennessee Department of Correction

    36 S.W.3d 824 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 29, 2000

    The board shall have the authority to penalize or punish prisoners who escape from any of the above programs in accordance with board policy. … See Wells v. Board of Paroles, 909 S.W.2d 826 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Turner v. Aldor Co. of Nashville, Inc.

    827 S.W.2d 318 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 20, 1991

    Brown, 88 Tenn. 578, 584 , 13 S.W. 286 , 287 (1890). There must be an identity of the parties in order for the new and original complaints to be substantially the same. Goss v. … Hutchins, 751 S.W.2d 821, 825 (Tenn.1988); Moran v. Weinberger, 149 Tenn. at 546 , 260 S.W. at 968; Hughes v. Brown, 88 Tenn. at 584 , 13 S.W. at 287. Mr.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Joy Roy/Sam Dawkins v. W.T. Diamond

    16 S.W.3d 783 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 30, 1999

    Forrester v. … See Woodson v. Porter Brown Limestone Co., Inc., 916 S.W.2d 896, 907 (Tenn. 1996) (noting that extremely persuasive evidence tends to be prejudicial).

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Jennifer Anne Kraus v. Barry Martin Thomas

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 7, 2013

    Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 168 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). … Gonsewski v. Gonsewski, 350 S.W.3d 99, 105 (Tenn. 2011) (citing Bratton v. Bratton, 136 S.W.3d 595, 605 (Tenn. 2004); Burlew v. Burlew, 40 S.W.3d 465, 470 (Tenn. 2001); Crabtree v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carol Mooney v. Genuine Parts Company d/b/a National Automotive Association, Inc. ("NAPA")

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 11, 2016

    Estate of Brown, 402 S.W.3d 193, 198 (Tenn. 2013). … V. CONCLUSION For the aforementioned reasons, the decision of the circuit court is hereby affirmed 3 During oral argument in this case, Plaintiff‟s counsel argued that this case was comparable to Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.