Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstennctapp

8,955 results

1.43s

  • Edward Harper v. Shelby County Schools

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 1, 2019

    The teacher does not have the ability to present new evidence on the merits of the charges; the chancery court’s de novo review is limited to the record of the school board proceedings. Emory v. … In Ketchersid v. Rhea County Board of Education, this Court affirmed the school board’s decision to dismiss a tenured teacher on the basis of insubordination, incompetence, and inefficiency. Ketchersid v. Rhea Cty.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Akins v. Akins

    61 Tenn. App. 506 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 5, 1969

    However, as said by the Supreme Court in Brown v. … Brown (1929), 159 Tenn. 551 , 20 S.W.2d 1037 : “It must be borne in mind that reasonable certainty only is exacted, not ‘mathematical certainty,’ as expressed by Judge Cooper in Dismukes v. Dismukes, 1 Tenn. Ch. 266.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Austin v. Shelby County Government

    3 S.W.3d 474 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 25, 1999

    See, e.g., Oswalt v. … Although the Chancery Court later reversed the Board’s decision, this court ultimately reinstated the Board’s ruling. Id. at 300.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Karen Mundy v. James Mundy

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 28, 2000

    See Kinard v. Kinard, 986 S.W.2d 220, 230 (Tenn.Ct.App. 1998); Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 168 (Tenn.Ct.App. 1994). … Kinard, 986 S.W.2d at 231; Brown, 913 S.W.2d at 168.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • IN THE MATTER OF GEORGE W. WALLS, JR.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 13, 2026

    Davis v. Price, 189 Tenn. 555, 226 S.W.2d 290, 292 (1949); see also McDonald v. … In Killingsworth v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jamie Randolph, on behalf of her mother, Carolyn Randolph v. Gianfranco Meduri, M.D.

    416 S.W.3d 378 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 2, 2011

    Biscan v. Brown, 160 S.W.3d 462, 468 (Tenn. 2005) (citing Mercer v. Vanderbilt Univ., Inc., 134 S.W.3d 121, 131 (Tenn. 2004)). … Judgments awarded beyond the scope of the pleadings are void.5 Brown v. Brown, 281 S.W.2d 492, 497 (Tenn. 1955) (citations omitted).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Kimberly Lewis v. Timothy Lewis

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 22, 2002

    Fisher, 648 S.W.2d 244, 246 (Tenn.1983); Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d at 168, and appellate courts accord great weight to a trial judge's division of marital property. … See Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d at 168; Mahaffey v. Mahaffey, 775 S.W.2d 618, 622 (Tenn.Ct.App.1989); Hardin v. Hardin, 689 S.W.2d 152, 154 (Tenn.Ct.App.1983).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gozenbach v. Gozenbach

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 13, 1997

    NCNB v. Thrailkill, 856 S.W.2d 250, 153 (Tenn. App. 1993). … In Brown v. Brown, 863 S.W.2d 432 (Tenn. App. 1993), the trial court had entered on January 29, 1991 a decree approving and incorporating a marital dissolution agreement between the parties.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wood v. Myers Paper Company

    3 Tenn. App. 128 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 25, 1926

    Complainant has cited in support of the contention made by him, the case of Nashville Packet Co. v. Neville, 144 Tenn., 698 . In that case it appeared that the stock -was owned in equal shares by Ryman and Neville. … Vol. '1, page 720: “Dissensions among the stockholders or the members of the Board of Directors may lead to the appointment of a receiver.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Southern Advertising Co. v. Sherman

    43 Tenn. App. 323 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 6, 1957

    that will obstruct visibility of said sign board.” … In footnote 20, the author cites Davis v. Town Properties Invest. Corp. [1903] 1 Ch. (Eng) 797, 6 BRO-CA.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Denson v. Benjamin

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 12, 1999

    Kindred v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools, 946 S.W.2d 47 (Tenn. App 1996); Roberts v. Robertson County Board of Education, 692 S.W.2d 863 (Tenn. App. 1985); Benton v. … School Board, 386 So.2d 831 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Shante D. by Ada D. v. City of New York Bd. Of Educ., 598 N.Y.S.2d 474 (A.D. 1 Dept. 1993).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • J.C. Bradford v. Southern Realty

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 10, 1998

    While oral stipulations are binding upon the parties and may be the basis of a ruling by the court, Department of Highways v. Urban Estates, Inc., 465 S.W.2d 357, 360 (Tenn. … Brown will echo this: In my dealing with Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of Memphis, Tennessee

    160 S.W.3d 901 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 12, 2004

    In February 1962, the Board of Commissioners enacted Ordinance No. 954. … City of Nashville v. Brown, 25 Tenn.App. 340 , 157 S.W.2d 612, 615 (1941) (citing Fleming v. Memphis, 126 Tenn. 331, 337 , 148 S.W. 1057 , 42 L.R.A.N.S., 493 , Ann. Cas.1913D, 1306; Shepherd v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • John M. Cannon, Grayson Smith Cannon, and Cannon, Cannon, & Cooper v. Susan Garner Abby, Davidson Circuit Rubenfeld, individually and D/B/A Rubenfeld & Associates

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 1, 1995

    In Brown v. … See Brown v. Superior Court, 670 P.2d 725 (Ariz. 1983). III.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Check Printers, Inc. v. David Gerregano

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 28, 2019

    Rye, 477 S.W.3d at 250 (citing Estate of Brown, 402 S.W.3d 193, 198 (Tenn. 2013); Hughes v. New Life Dev. Corp., 387 S.W.3d 453, 471 (Tenn. 2012)). … In Board of Publication of Methodist Church v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • LEIGHTON H. LIPPERT v. B & D REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES, LLC

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 30, 2026

    V. … Brown v. Erachem Comilog, Inc., 231 S.W.3d 918, 921 (Tenn. 2007). A temporary nuisance is one that “can be corrected by the expenditure of labor or money.” Clabo v. Great Am.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Phares v. Myatt

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 12, 1998

    Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tenn. 1992). … v. Washington, 744 S.W 2d, 574 (Tenn. App. 1987); Gray v. Amos, 869 S.W.2d 834 (Tenn. App.1993).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brandt v. McCord

    281 S.W.3d 394 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 26, 2008

    Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn. 1997). We consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and resolve all inferences in that party’s favor. Stovall v. … Your x-rays were placed on the board when I reviewed the situation including my concerns with both you and Mrs. Brandt.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Turner v. Aldor Co. of Nashville, Inc.

    827 S.W.2d 318 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 20, 1991

    Brown, 88 Tenn. 578, 584 , 13 S.W. 286 , 287 (1890). There must be an identity of the parties in order for the new and original complaints to be substantially the same. Goss v. … Hutchins, 751 S.W.2d 821, 825 (Tenn.1988); Moran v. Weinberger, 149 Tenn. at 546 , 260 S.W. at 968; Hughes v. Brown, 88 Tenn. at 584 , 13 S.W. at 287. Mr.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Frame v. Davidson Transit Organization

    194 S.W.3d 429 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 6, 2005

    See Moore v. Nashville Electrical Power Board, 72 S.W.3d 643, 651 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). One is by direct evidence of discrimination. Id. The other is by indirect proof of discrimination. Id. … Wilson, 104 S.W.3d at 50-51 (citing Dews v. A.B. Dick Co., 231 F.3d 1016, 1021 (6th Cir.2000); Cliff v. Board of School Commissioners, 42 F.3d 403, 412 (7th Cir. 1994); McNabola v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.