Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstennctapp

8,955 results

1.30s

  • Daniel Lowe v. Faytella Lowe

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 26, 2001

    See Cohen v. Cohen, 937 S.W.2d 823, 830 (Tenn. 1996); Kendrick v. Kendrick, 902 S.W.2d 918, 926 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). … Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 168 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harakas Construction, Inc. v. Metropolitan Government Of Nashville and Davidson County

    561 S.W.3d 910 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 29, 2018

    Estate of Brown, 402 S.W.3d 193, 198 (Tenn. 2013) (citing Hughes v. New Life Dev. … In the context of sovereign immunity, “ ‘[t]he State’ includes ‘the departments, commissions, boards, institutions and municipalities of the State.’ ” Davidson v. Lewis Bros.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Chandler Investment Co. v. Whitehaven Utility District

    44 Tenn. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 1, 1957

    Cline v. Redbank Utility District, 194 Tenn. 255 , 250 S. W. (2d) 362 . … Horton v. Nashville, 72 Tenn. 39 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • David Swett, Sr. v. Grace Z. Aleman Swett

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 15, 1999

    King v. King, 986 S.W.2d 216, 219 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998); Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 168 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). … Brown v. Brown, 913 -10- S.W.2d at 168; Mahaffey v. Mahaffey, 775 S.W.2d 618, 622 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1989); Hardin v. Hardin, 689 S.W.2d 152, 154 (Tenn. Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • T. Verner Smith v. Jerry F. Gardner

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 27, 2011

    Watson v. Watson, 196 S.W.3d 695, 701 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005) (citing Walker v. Sidney Gilreath & Assocs., 40 S.W.3d 66, 71 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000); The Realty Shop, Inc. v. … Evidence of Proceedings before the Board of Professional Responsibility Next, Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ogburn v. Tennessee Department of Correction

    983 S.W.2d 677 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 14, 1998

    Green v. Department of Correction, No. 01-A-01-9110-CH-00352, 1992 WL 14123 (Tenn.Ct.App. filed Nashville Jan. 31, 1992); Hitson v. Bradley, No. 01-A-01-9403-CH-00129, 1994 WL 420912 (Tenn. Ct. … In Rowland v. Bradley, 899 S.W.2d 614 (Tenn.App.1994), and Blankenship v. Campbell, No. 01-A-01-9603-CH-00099, 1996 WL 346682 (Tenn. Ct.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • ISI Holdings Of TN, LLC v. Mount Pleasant Regional Planning Commission

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 12, 2017

    Knott v. Stewart County, 185 Tenn. at 626, 207 S.W.2d at 338–39; Bell v. Todd, 206 S.W.3d 86, 96 (Tenn.Ct.App.2005); Massengill v. … (citing Dalton v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Elgain Ricky Wilson v. Shane Adcock

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 26, 2018

    It is limited to determining whether an inferior tribunal, board, or officer exceeded its jurisdiction or acted illegally, arbitrarily, or fraudulently. Tenn. Code Ann. § 27–8–101; Stewart v. … Powell v. Parole Eligibility Review Board, 879 S.W.2d 871, 873 (Tenn. App. 1994); Stewart, 368 S.W.3d at 463.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Crowe v. Crowe

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 12, 2000

    See Houghland v. Houghland, 844 S.W.2d 619, 623 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992); Hall v. Hall, 772 S.W.2d 432, 438 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1989). … See Lindsey v. Lindsey, 976 S.W.2d 175, 179 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997); Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 169 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994); and Lancaster v. Lancaster, 671 S.W.2d 501, 503 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1984).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mathis v. American Family Life Assurance Co. of Columbus

    614 S.W.2d 800 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 21, 1981

    The pathologist establishing the diagnosis shall base his judgment solely on the criteria of malignancy as accepted by the American Board of Pathology or the Osteopathic Board of Pathology after a study of the histocytologic … Whereupon, by a cytologic diagnosis, Class V malignant cells were determined to be present; but, a biopsy was recommended before any radical procedure was followed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Donald King v. Betty King

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 23, 2002

    Lindsey v. Lindsey, 976 S.W.2d 175, 180 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). … Because Husband failed to address this issue with the trial court, he is precluded from raising the issue on appeal.2 Brown v. Brown, No. M1999-01085-COA-R3- CV, 2000 Tenn. App. LEXIS 287, at *5-6 (Tenn. Ct. App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harper Enterprises v. City of Bean Station

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 15, 2002

    Needham v. Beer Bd. of Blount County, 647 S.W.2d 226, 231 (Tenn. 1983). … In Neece v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Clark Earls v. Shirley Earls

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 31, 2000

    Code Ann. § 36-4-101(11) (Supp. 1999); Gardner v. Gardner, 104 Tenn. 410, 412, 58 S.W. 342, 343 (1900); Garvey v. Garvey, 29 Tenn. App. 291, 299-300, 203 S.W.2d 912, 916 (1946); White v. White, Carrol Eq. … P. 11 application filed); Brown v. Brown, No. 02A01-9108-CV-00168, 1992 WL 5243 at *3 (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 16, 1992) (no Tenn. R. App. P. 11 application filed).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Holder, etc. v. Celsor

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 27, 1997

    Holder v. Celsor, 914 S.W.2d 496, 501 (Tenn. App.), perm. app. denied, (Tenn. 1995). … See Smith v. Rodgers, 677 S.W.2d 1, 4 (Tenn. App. 1984); James v. Williams, 20 Tenn. App. 420, 99 S.W.2d 831 (1936).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Deena Brell v. Deniece Thomas, Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 13, 2025

    Therefore, the board ruled that Ms. Kelley was entitled to benefits beginning on September 21, 2013,7 and the employer appealed. Id. at 897. … Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 430 A.2d 1214 (Pa. Commw.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Flautt And Mann, a Partnership v. The Council of The City Of Memphis

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 22, 2005

    The common law writ of certiorari provides the proper procedural vehicle for reviewing the decisions of a municipal zoning board. McCallen v. City of Memphis, 786 S.W.2d 633, 639 (Tenn. 1990); Fallin v. … A court reviewing the decision of a local zoning board is not permitted to re-weigh the evidence, Watts v. Civil Serv.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Karen Mundy v. James Mundy

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 28, 2000

    See Kinard v. Kinard, 986 S.W.2d 220, 230 (Tenn.Ct.App. 1998); Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 168 (Tenn.Ct.App. 1994). … Kinard, 986 S.W.2d at 231; Brown, 913 S.W.2d at 168.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Austin v. Shelby County Government

    3 S.W.3d 474 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 25, 1999

    See, e.g., Oswalt v. … Although the Chancery Court later reversed the Board’s decision, this court ultimately reinstated the Board’s ruling. Id. at 300.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Historic Sylvan Park, Inc. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville, Davidson County, Tennessee

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 29, 2015

    A decision or action by a board or commission that is not final is “not subject to judicial review under the common law writ of certiorari.” Walker v. Metro. Bd. of Parks and Recreation, No. … Meighan v. U.S. Sprint Commc’ns Co., 924 S.W.2d 632, 639 (Tenn. 1996) (citing Landers v. Jones, 872 S.W.2d 674 (Tenn. 1994)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Savannah Leigh Jackson v. The State of Tennessee

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 19, 2021

    Stevens v. … El-Amin v. Dempsey, 329 Ill. App. 3d 800, 768 N.E.2d 344 (1st Dist. 2002); See R. Brown, Balancing Privacy and Proof: Discovery of NonParty Medical Records, 21 J. Health Care Law & Policy 189 (2018).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.