Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstennctapp

8,955 results

0.90s

  • Brenda Griffith, next of kin of Decedent, Bob Griffith v. Dr. Stephen Goryl and Upper Cumberland Urology Associates, P.C.

    403 S.W.3d 198 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 31, 2012

    Sutphin v. Platt, 720 S.W.2d 455, 457 (Tenn. 1986) (quoting Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-26-115(a)(1)). In Shipley v. … I believe some or all are Board qualified or Board certified, and in general, the standard of care in most metropolitan areas across the United States would be relatively similar if Board Qualified or

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Chicago Title Insurance Company v. Closed Nashville, LLC

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 18, 2026

    Crouch v. Univ. of Tenn., No. E2023-00023-COA-R3-CV, 2024 WL 2319652, at *3 (Tenn. Ct. App. May 22, 2024) (quoting Smith v. Tenn. Nat’l Guard, 551 S.W.3d 702, 709 (Tenn. 2018)). … The funds held by THDA, a state agency, are held in a sovereign capacity, unlike the bank property in Univ. of Tenn. v. People’s Bank, 6 S.W.2d at 330, or the railroad company in White v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee Ex Rel. Mark B. Garrett v. City of Norris, Tennessee

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 28, 2014

    Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn. 1997); Cowden v. Sovran Bank/Cent. S., 816 S.W.2d 741, 744 (Tenn. 1991). … Earhart v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Adventist Health Care System/Sunbelt Health Care Corp. v. Nashville Memorial Hospital, Inc.

    914 S.W.2d 903 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 9, 1995

    Perry v. Banks, 521 S.W.2d 549, 550 (Tenn.1975); LaRouche v. Crowell, 709 S.W.2d 585, 587 (Tenn.A.po.1985). This is especially true when the relief sought is in-junctive. … The Attorney General emphasized that the board of the hospital had not acted improperly.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Thomas Stubblefield v. Monique Stubblefield

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 10, 2001

    Also see Bookout v. Bookout, 954 S.W.2d 730 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997); Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 168 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994); Fisher v. Fisher, 648 S.W.2d 244, 246 (Tenn. 1983). … Kendrick v. Kendrick, 902 S.W.2d 918, 926 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). Also see Cohen v. Cohen, 937 S.W.2d 823 (Tenn. 1996).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shelby County v. Armour

    495 S.W.2d 816 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 15, 1971

    The Shelby County Conservation Board was created under the authority of T.C.A. Section 11-1101 et seq. The purposes of such boards are set out in Section 11-1101 which we copy as follows: “11-1101. … Harper v. Trenton Housing Authority, 197 Tenn. 257 , 271 S.W.2d 185 ; Stapleton v. State, 195 Tenn. 144 , 258 S.W.2d 736 . T.C.A.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gregory Charles Hoppe v. Susan Lynn Hoppe

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 2, 2021

    Brown, terminated her services after Mother berated Ms. Brown for not finding any evidence of sexual abuse during therapy. … Brown discontinued her services: [OH] shall continue his therapy with Paris Brown . . . with such frequency and duration of therapy as determined in collaboration with Ms. Brown. . . .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Johnson City

    41 Tenn. App. 148 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 11, 1956

    Notes to Gilson v. Delaware, etc. Canal Co., 36 Am. St. Rep. 811 ; Barr v. Railroad, supra; Rosenbaum v. Shoffner, 98 Tenn. [624] 630, 40 S. W. 1086 , and cases cited; 13 Am. & Eng. … In Gray v. Brown, 188 Tenn. 152 , 217 S. W. (2d) 769, 772 , it was held that the act of the plaintiff, Mrs.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Mary Helen Pearson Johnson v. Luther William Johnson

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 7, 1997

    E.g., Underwood v. Zurich Ins. Co., 854 S.W.2d 94, 97 (Tenn. 1993); Tyler v. Tyler, 671 S.W.2d 492, 495 (Tenn. App. 1984). … In reversing the trial court’s decision, this Court first examined the workers’ compensation case of Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Byron Avenue 3501, LLC v. Metropolitan Historic Zoning Commission of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, TN

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 24, 2011

    Thomas V. White, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Byron Avenue 3501, LLC. J. … Watts v. Civil Serv. Bd., 606 S.W.2d 274, 276 (Tenn. 1980); Leonard Plating Co. v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville & Davidson County, 213 S.W.3d 898, 903 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fairhaven Corp. v. Tennessee Health Facilities Commission

    566 S.W.2d 885 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 7, 1976

    . § 27-901 to 914; Fentress County Beer Board v. Cravens, 209 Tenn. 679 , 356 S.W.2d 260 (1962); Hoover Motor Exp. Co. v. Railroad & Pub. Util. … Wilson v.

    Cited 50 timesPublished
  • Robert Martin v. Union Planters

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 12, 1998

    Winfree v. Educators Credit Union, 900 S.W.2d 285, 289 (Tenn. App. 1995); Rainey v. Stansell, 836 S.W.2d 117 (Tenn. App. 1992). … Co. v. Exide, 709 S.W.2d 604, 607 (Tenn. App. 1986).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lazenby v. Lazenby

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 24, 1998

    Brown v. Brown, Tenn. App. 1994, -3- 913 S.W.2d 163. … Evans v. Evans, Tenn. App. 1977, 558 S.W.2d 851. In the division of martial property, the court has jurisdiction to do what may be just and reasonable under the circumstances. Langford v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Donald D'Amico v. James Davenport

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 31, 1997

    Wallace v. Stewart, 559 S.W.2d 647, 648 (Tenn. 1977); Armstrong v. Neel, 725 S.W.2d 953, 955 (Tenn. App. 1986). In Armstrong v. … Cherry v. Suburban Mfg. Co., 745 S.W.2d 273, 275 (Tenn. 1988).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Seibers v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 21, 2000

    Starks v. Browning, 20 S.W.3d 645, 650 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999); Restatement (Third) of the Law Governing Lawyers §§ 16, 17 (2000). … Crawford v. Logan, 656 S.W.2d at 364; Starks v. Browning, 20 S.W.3d at 650.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ronnie Gordon v. Tractor Supply Company

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 8, 2016

    Id.; Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn. 1997). In so doing, we consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and draw all reasonable inferences in that party‟s favor. Godfrey v. … According to the plaintiff, the drug manufacturer “falsely and maliciously” filed a complaint against her with the Tennessee Board of Pharmacy. Id.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Peter Kuderewski v. Estate of Hoover Hoobs

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 30, 2001

    Wyatt v. Brown, 281 S.W.2d 64, 68 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1955); Messer Griesheim Indus., Inc. v. Cryotech of Kingsport, Inc., 45 S.W. 3d 588, 605 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). … Id.; see also Wheeler v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mitchell Lloyd MaGill v. Mary R. MaGill

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 31, 2004

    Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 168 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994) (citation omitted). Such a division is to be effected upon consideration of the statutory factors found in Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-121(c) (Supp. 2003). … Brown, 913 S.W.2d at 168. The record in this case is devoid of any evidence as to the value of MaGill Electric and C & M Lounge.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jabari Issa Mandela a/k/a John H. Wooden v. Tennessee Department of Correction

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 29, 2011

    Howell v. State, 569 S.W.2d 428, 430 n.1 (Tenn. 1978). … Mathews Partners, LLC v. Lemme, No. M2008- 01036-COA-R3-CV, 2009 WL 3172134, at *3 (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2009) (citing Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn. 1977)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dwight Mitchell v. State of Tennessee, Department of Health

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 11, 2018

    12/11/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 5, 2018 DWIGHT MITCHELL v. … Bishop v. Tenn. Dep’t. of Corrections, 896 S.W.2d 557, 558 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.