Case law

City of Jackson v. Jeff Butler

10 S.W.3d 250 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 15, 1999

City of Chattanooga v. Meyers, 787 S.W.2d 921, 922 (Tenn. 1990) (citing Briggs v. City of Union City, 531 S.W.2d 106, 107 (Tenn. 1975)). … See also Adamson v. C.I.R., 745 F.2d 541 (1984); Vander Linden v. U.S., 502 F.Supp. 693 (1980); McDaniel v. City of Seattle, 828 P.2d 81 (1992); U.S. v. Moddes, Inc., 787 F.Supp. 1466 (1992).

In Re: JJC

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 14, 2001

Supreme Court’s decision in May v. Anderson, 345 U.S.528, 73 S. Ct. 840, 97 L. … See also Brown v. Brown, 847 S.W.2d 496, 499 n.2 (Tenn. 1993).

William E. Cherry v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of The Department of Revenue For the State of Tennessee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 15, 2014

United Canners, Inc. v. King, 696 S.W.2d 525, 527 (Tenn. 1985); Fidelity-Bankers Trust Co. v. McCanless, 181 S.W.2d 747, 750 (Tenn. 1944). … Dobson v. Huddleston, 863 S.W.2d 392, 398-99 (Tenn. 1993).

Dave Brundage v. Cumberland County

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 4, 2010

See, e.g., Hayslip v. Bondurant, 194 Tenn. 175, 250 S.W.2d 63 (1952); City of Knoxville Board of Education v. Markelonis, 62 Tenn.App. 181, 460 S.W.2d 362 (1969). … Common law writs only review whether the board acted within its jurisdiction/powers, whereas statutory writs review whether the board made errors of fact or law. See Cooper; see also Davison v.

Werne v. Sanderson

954 S.W.2d 742 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 18, 1997

Leatherwood v. United Parcel Service, 708 S.W.2d 396, 402 (Tenn.App.1985). In Woods v. … Brown v.

Far Tower Sites, LLC v. Knox County

126 S.W.3d 52 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 20, 2003

V. … In the “estoppel” part of its brief, Far Tower places great emphasis on the Supreme Court decision in Needham v. Beer Board of Blount County, 647 S.W.2d 226 (Tenn.1983).

Johnson v. Robinson

5 Tenn. App. 502 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 30, 1927

It was held in the case of Brown v. … Taylor, 108 Ill., 725 , and Brigham v. Brown, 44 Mich., 59 , it was held that if the deed be recorded before such instructions are given, the record is not notice.

James Jennings v. Charles Traughber

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 6, 1996

If the agency or board has reached its decision in a constitutional or lawful manner, then the decision would not be subject to judicial review. Powell v. … State v. Wade, 863 S.W.2d 406, 408 (Tenn. 1993).

Patricia Rounds v. Kathleen L. Caldwell

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 15, 2006

But, the complaint filed with the Board essentially alleged the same wrongful acts of the Defendant as alleged in this action, which concludes the issue as a matter of law. See, Hill v. Moncier, 122 S.W.3d 787 (Tenn. … App. 2003); Swett v. Binkley, 104 S.W.3d 64 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002).

Chicago Title Insurance Company v. Closed Nashville, LLC

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 18, 2026

Crouch v. Univ. of Tenn., No. E2023-00023-COA-R3-CV, 2024 WL 2319652, at *3 (Tenn. Ct. App. May 22, 2024) (quoting Smith v. Tenn. Nat’l Guard, 551 S.W.3d 702, 709 (Tenn. 2018)). … The funds held by THDA, a state agency, are held in a sovereign capacity, unlike the bank property in Univ. of Tenn. v. People’s Bank, 6 S.W.2d at 330, or the railroad company in White v.

Jackson ex rel. Bohan Group, Inc. v. Bohan

861 S.W.2d 241 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 16, 1993

Corporations § 462, p. 63, n. 58; Myhre v. Myhre, 170 Mont. 410 , 554 P.2d 276 (1976); Remillong v. Schneider, N.D. 1971, 185 N.W.2d 493 . … Kirksey v. Overton Pub., Inc., Tenn.App.1987, 739 S.W.2d 230 .

Adams v. Cooper

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 29, 2000

See Brown v. Brown, 847 S.W.2d 496, 500 (Tenn. 1993). … Brown, 847 S.W.2d at 500.

ANTWAIN SALES v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 17, 2025

See Nelson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 8 S.W.3d 625, 628 (Tenn. 1999). Jackson v. Tenn. Dep’t of Corr., 240 S.W.3d 241, 243 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006) (quoting Northland Ins. Co. v. … As we explained in Richardson: In Richmond, the petitioner inmate was convicted of a disciplinary offense by the Department of Correction disciplinary board.

Thomas ex rel. Glover v. R.W. Harmon, Inc.

760 S.W.2d 212 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 10, 1988

In Gann v. … In Kates v.

Shirley Russell, Ph.D. v. Meharry Medical College

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 13, 2005

Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn. 1997). We consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and resolve all inferences in that party's favor. Godfrey v. Ruiz, 90 S.W.3d 692, 695 (Tenn. 2002). … Omlor v. Cleveland State University, 543 N.E.2d 1238 (Ohio, 1989); Edinger v. Board of Regents of Morehead State University, 906 F.2d 1136, 1140 (6th Cir. 1990).

David Britt v. Donal Campbell

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 14, 2001

The Disciplinary Board found Mr. … See Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308 (1976).3 It is unclear from the record what inferences the Disciplinary Board may have drawn from Mr.

Memphis Bonding Company, Inc. v. Criminal Court of Tennessee 30th District

490 S.W.3d 458 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 25, 2015

Brown v. Brown, 281 S.W.2d 492, 497 (Tenn. 1955). We believe the same reasoning applies to the situation before us. … Estate of Brown, 402 S.W.3d 193, 199 (Tenn. 2013).

Freddie Armstrong v. Shelby County Juvenile Court

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 20, 2018

On appeal, we review the decision of the Shelby County Civil Service Merit Board using the same standard of review used by the chancery court. Parker v. Shelby County Gov’t Civil Serv. … Co. of Tenn. v. Oak Ridge FM, Inc., 395 S.W.3d 653, 670 (Tenn. 2013) (“Issues raised for the first time on appeal are waived.”). V.

Reid v. Lutche

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 24, 2001

prevent further review of the disciplinary board’s action. … Rhoden v.

Ray Donald Hawkins v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County Tennessee - Concurring

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 3, 1996

Hamilton V. … On March 11, 1992, one hour before a scheduled meeting of the Power Board, a Board member informed the appellant that at the meeting the Board would vote to dismiss him.